

captainhardcore wrote: Call me crazy, but I don't consider people convulsing, twitching or lying stiff as a board on the field "part of the game". I can do just fine without it.
reverendmike wrote:
I think I speak for the board when I say we'd all like to see you convulsing, twitching, or lying stiff as a board on the field.












eagle216 wrote:Remember when we had the best culmulative record in our division since we joined the ACC (a 5 year sample). We may still do.
Yet the EA douches, and sadly some on here, want to throw the team a god damn pizza party for beating f'in Clemson, almost beating f'in FSU, and beating Cake Forest. I love how actual facts be damned, these idiots still think we should be just happy to be on the same field as these teams.
This is what pisses me the most. We have owned this division since we have been in the ACC, yet these assclowns want to relinquish it faster than OJ relinguished his virginity to Elton John. We are now supposed to be happy with modest wins vs. the ACC's two dormats (likely Wake and Dook), whoever else sucks at the time (for now, UVa), plus one "upset" of an ACC Bigum. Then we are supposed to be overjoyed to make, and maybe win, the Depends Bowl.
Think about this: Spaz is praying for a 4-4 season with this schedule - Home (VPI, MD, Clem, UVa), Away (NCSU, FSU, Wake, Dook). If he gets it, the EA crowd will friggin crown him.


eagle216 wrote:Think about this: Spaz is praying for a 4-4 season with this schedule - Home (VPI, MD, Clem, UVa), Away (NCSU, FSU, Wake, Dook). If he gets it, the EA crowd will friggin crown him.


campion wrote:HJS wrote:eagle216 wrote:Think about this: Spaz is praying for a 4-4 season with this schedule - Home (VPI, MD, Clem, UVa), Away (NCSU, FSU, Wake, Dook). If he gets it, the EA crowd will friggin crown him.
The EA crowd hates BC being anything more than slightly better than Holy Cross. This is their IDEAL season. This is EXACTLY where they believe BC should be every year... fighting for their lives to win 6 games in a 12 game schedule. They effing HATED 2007. Effing HATED it. Oh... they loved Matty Ice... they just hated the brash way we went about trying to win every game we played. The audacity of what-should-still-be a commuter school!!!!
It is why the Wah-Wah/Rah-Rah monikers never really fit.
How do you know this when you are the one who started this thread by asking people to copy and paste from that website to this one? What evidence do you have to support these assertions other than that they fit your pre-existing worldview or your memory of what EA was like in 2005? This very thread exists because you have no access over there. But you know everything about the people who post there.
Just like you guaranteed that Jim Grobe was going to Virginia... 2 years ago. You bring this on yourself by your refusal ever to make any statement or assertion sound speculative or tentative. Everything you write rings with the authority of Revelation.










Reverend Mike wrote:campion wrote:HJS wrote:eagle216 wrote:Think about this: Spaz is praying for a 4-4 season with this schedule - Home (VPI, MD, Clem, UVa), Away (NCSU, FSU, Wake, Dook). If he gets it, the EA crowd will friggin crown him.
The EA crowd hates BC being anything more than slightly better than Holy Cross. This is their IDEAL season. This is EXACTLY where they believe BC should be every year... fighting for their lives to win 6 games in a 12 game schedule. They effing HATED 2007. Effing HATED it. Oh... they loved Matty Ice... they just hated the brash way we went about trying to win every game we played. The audacity of what-should-still-be a commuter school!!!!
It is why the Wah-Wah/Rah-Rah monikers never really fit.
How do you know this when you are the one who started this thread by asking people to copy and paste from that website to this one? What evidence do you have to support these assertions other than that they fit your pre-existing worldview or your memory of what EA was like in 2005? This very thread exists because you have no access over there. But you know everything about the people who post there.
Just like you guaranteed that Jim Grobe was going to Virginia... 2 years ago. You bring this on yourself by your refusal ever to make any statement or assertion sound speculative or tentative. Everything you write rings with the authority of Revelation.
Shit just got real.










Reverend Mike wrote:campion wrote:HJS wrote:eagle216 wrote:Think about this: Spaz is praying for a 4-4 season with this schedule - Home (VPI, MD, Clem, UVa), Away (NCSU, FSU, Wake, Dook). If he gets it, the EA crowd will friggin crown him.
The EA crowd hates BC being anything more than slightly better than Holy Cross. This is their IDEAL season. This is EXACTLY where they believe BC should be every year... fighting for their lives to win 6 games in a 12 game schedule. They effing HATED 2007. Effing HATED it. Oh... they loved Matty Ice... they just hated the brash way we went about trying to win every game we played. The audacity of what-should-still-be a commuter school!!!!
It is why the Wah-Wah/Rah-Rah monikers never really fit.
How do you know this when you are the one who started this thread by asking people to copy and paste from that website to this one? What evidence do you have to support these assertions other than that they fit your pre-existing worldview or your memory of what EA was like in 2005? This very thread exists because you have no access over there. But you know everything about the people who post there.
Just like you guaranteed that Jim Grobe was going to Virginia... 2 years ago. You bring this on yourself by your refusal ever to make any statement or assertion sound speculative or tentative. Everything you write rings with the authority of Revelation.
Shit just got real.
NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!










HJS wrote:DomingoOrtiz wrote:Eagledom wrote:Losing Larmond was fucking huge. The WRs are TERRIBLE...having just one legit threat in there would help the O a lot.
Very true
Not true. All CLJ would have done was given OJ's boy more weeks at QB. We would've rolled with Shinskie (with Marsco subbing in after the concussion) through Clemson before taking the redshirt off of Rettig for last week's game against Wake to see if he could stop the then-6-game losing streak.
This is so effing stupid. They didn't start the right players in the right positions all Summer long and through the first half of the season. End of story. No strategy, injury, recruiting deficiency changes that very simple fact.
The team is performing better and better each week as the right QB and right OLinemen playing the correct positions begin to gel. We are right now exactly where we should've been heading into the second game of the season. Discussion about anything else other than squandering talent or potential new coaches just acts camouflage for the real problem.




Eagledom wrote:HJS wrote:DomingoOrtiz wrote:Eagledom wrote:Losing Larmond was fucking huge. The WRs are TERRIBLE...having just one legit threat in there would help the O a lot.
Very true
Not true. All CLJ would have done was given OJ's boy more weeks at QB. We would've rolled with Shinskie (with Marsco subbing in after the concussion) through Clemson before taking the redshirt off of Rettig for last week's game against Wake to see if he could stop the then-6-game losing streak.
This is so effing stupid. They didn't start the right players in the right positions all Summer long and through the first half of the season. End of story. No strategy, injury, recruiting deficiency changes that very simple fact.
The team is performing better and better each week as the right QB and right OLinemen playing the correct positions begin to gel. We are right now exactly where we should've been heading into the second game of the season. Discussion about anything else other than squandering talent or potential new coaches just acts camouflage for the real problem.
This is why no one takes you seriously. For any valid point you make, it is hidden in 10 layers of hyperbole and exaggeration. To say that getting rid of tranq (and unfortunately having to deal with still having Spaz as head coach) would not be a step in the right direction is fucking stupid. Your agenda is so fucking overwhelming that you have lost all perspective. Things aren't good, but the program is not dead and burried for the next 5 years as you would like to believe.












2001Eagle wrote:From Rocko this morning, bemoaning our ill-advised results in 2007-08...enjoy!
When Tranq is replaced (whenever that occurs) it is very important that the offensive philosophy remains similar. BC doesn't want to go through another transition to 'a different type of player.' Like the ill advised transition to zone blocking linemen and then back to power blocking linemen. For instance, we sure wouldn't want to go a spread attack that uses 4 and 5 wide and underutilize the very good TE's we have or have commitments from. We wouldn't want to start running the triple option with Retig and Sunstrup, etc...











bignick33 wrote:What is our offensive philosophy?










2001Eagle wrote:From Rocko this morning, bemoaning our ill-advised results in 2007-08...enjoy!
When Tranq is replaced (whenever that occurs) it is very important that the offensive philosophy remains similar. BC doesn't want to go through another transition to 'a different type of player.' Like the ill advised transition to zone blocking linemen and then back to power blocking linemen. For instance, we sure wouldn't want to go a spread attack that uses 4 and 5 wide and underutilize the very good TE's we have or have commitments from. We wouldn't want to start running the triple option with Retig and Sunstrup, etc...



2001Eagle wrote:From Rocko this morning, bemoaning our ill-advised results in 2007-08...enjoy!
When Tranq is replaced (whenever that occurs) it is very important that the offensive philosophy remains similar. BC doesn't want to go through another transition to 'a different type of player.' Like the ill advised transition to zone blocking linemen and then back to power blocking linemen. For instance, we sure wouldn't want to go a spread attack that uses 4 and 5 wide and underutilize the very good TE's we have or have commitments from. We wouldn't want to start running the triple option with Retig and Sunstrup, etc...




HJS wrote:In response to campion... I have been posting on these interwebs boards for like 12 years. My style pretty much hasn't changed. I have an opinion (sometimes a well-informed one) and I deliver it in an unflinching manner. I don't hide it in niceties... never have.
Over the years, I have found that, when my info/opinions are most insightful and most accurate, they are met with the most objections and it is also when my "posting style" becomes a prominent topic of conversation.

NorthEndEagle wrote:That donkey had character issues.










NorthEndEagle wrote:That donkey had character issues.










2001Eagle wrote:From Rocko this morning, bemoaning our ill-advised results in 2007-08...enjoy!
When Tranq is replaced (whenever that occurs) it is very important that the offensive philosophy remains similar. BC doesn't want to go through another transition to 'a different type of player.' Like the ill advised transition to zone blocking linemen and then back to power blocking linemen. For instance, we sure wouldn't want to go a spread attack that uses 4 and 5 wide and underutilize the very good TE's we have or have commitments from. We wouldn't want to start running the triple option with Retig and Sunstrup, etc...



PhillyandBCEagles wrote:2001Eagle wrote:From Rocko this morning, bemoaning our ill-advised results in 2007-08...enjoy!
When Tranq is replaced (whenever that occurs) it is very important that the offensive philosophy remains similar. BC doesn't want to go through another transition to 'a different type of player.' Like the ill advised transition to zone blocking linemen and then back to power blocking linemen. For instance, we sure wouldn't want to go a spread attack that uses 4 and 5 wide and underutilize the very good TE's we have or have commitments from. We wouldn't want to start running the triple option with Retig and Sunstrup, etc...
Jags/Logan seemed to do alright with players who had been recruited for a TOB/Bible power offense.
The next OC doesn't have to be a younger version of Tranquill. It should be a guy who is able to fit his system to the players he has in the short term while being able to successfully recruit the players he needs to run his own system in the long run. What we need is a coach who has experience in several different types of systems. Ryan Day's star has fallen somewhat in the eyes of many BC fans but the guy has learned under Chip Kelly, Urban Meyer, Steve Logan, and Tranquill among others. He's a guy I think could be very successful, both in the short run and the long run, as our OC.


hansen wrote:PhillyandBCEagles wrote:2001Eagle wrote:From Rocko this morning, bemoaning our ill-advised results in 2007-08...enjoy!
When Tranq is replaced (whenever that occurs) it is very important that the offensive philosophy remains similar. BC doesn't want to go through another transition to 'a different type of player.' Like the ill advised transition to zone blocking linemen and then back to power blocking linemen. For instance, we sure wouldn't want to go a spread attack that uses 4 and 5 wide and underutilize the very good TE's we have or have commitments from. We wouldn't want to start running the triple option with Retig and Sunstrup, etc...
Jags/Logan seemed to do alright with players who had been recruited for a TOB/Bible power offense.
The next OC doesn't have to be a younger version of Tranquill. It should be a guy who is able to fit his system to the players he has in the short term while being able to successfully recruit the players he needs to run his own system in the long run. What we need is a coach who has experience in several different types of systems. Ryan Day's star has fallen somewhat in the eyes of many BC fans but the guy has learned under Chip Kelly, Urban Meyer, Steve Logan, and Tranquill among others. He's a guy I think could be very successful, both in the short run and the long run, as our OC.
exalt.
a good coach builds a system around the talent he has and wins.


ea about claiborne wrote:“Things were a little lackadaisical at some parts"...does that sound like someone who clearly gives a shit? He just admitted that he was lazy and he wasn't focused on football (he said one of the things Spaz asked him to do was show up on time). What the article says is that Spaz told him to get his ass in gear.



















HJS wrote:I know simonaa struggles with letter formation and simple math, but... I can never really understand the idea of killing kids at the expense of a coach. The player is like 20 years old, chose BC over dozens of schools, will one day be a fellow alum, and is out there busting his ass and throwing his longterm health at risk for my entertainment. The coach is in his sixties, is making millions, is here only because he has no better options, and preserves his health through frequent naps.
My allegiance is to my future fellow alums... always has been.

MilitantEagle wrote:HJS wrote:I know simonaa struggles with letter formation and simple math, but... I can never really understand the idea of killing kids at the expense of a coach. The player is like 20 years old, chose BC over dozens of schools, will one day be a fellow alum, and is out there busting his ass and throwing his longterm health at risk for my entertainment. The coach is in his sixties, is making millions, is here only because he has no better options, and preserves his health through frequent naps.
My allegiance is to my future fellow alums... always has been.
HJS, you constantly complain about the crappy recruits who eventually enroll and will be future fellow alums. You're just as bad.










MilitantEagle wrote:HJS wrote:I know simonaa struggles with letter formation and simple math, but... I can never really understand the idea of killing kids at the expense of a coach. The player is like 20 years old, chose BC over dozens of schools, will one day be a fellow alum, and is out there busting his ass and throwing his longterm health at risk for my entertainment. The coach is in his sixties, is making millions, is here only because he has no better options, and preserves his health through frequent naps.
My allegiance is to my future fellow alums... always has been.
HJS, you constantly complain about the crappy recruits who eventually enroll and will be future fellow alums. You're just as bad.
NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!










angrychicken wrote:MilitantEagle wrote:HJS wrote:I know simonaa struggles with letter formation and simple math, but... I can never really understand the idea of killing kids at the expense of a coach. The player is like 20 years old, chose BC over dozens of schools, will one day be a fellow alum, and is out there busting his ass and throwing his longterm health at risk for my entertainment. The coach is in his sixties, is making millions, is here only because he has no better options, and preserves his health through frequent naps.
My allegiance is to my future fellow alums... always has been.
HJS, you constantly complain about the crappy recruits who eventually enroll and will be future fellow alums. You're just as bad.
You just put him in a logic box.













angrychicken wrote:MilitantEagle wrote:HJS wrote:I know simonaa struggles with letter formation and simple math, but... I can never really understand the idea of killing kids at the expense of a coach. The player is like 20 years old, chose BC over dozens of schools, will one day be a fellow alum, and is out there busting his ass and throwing his longterm health at risk for my entertainment. The coach is in his sixties, is making millions, is here only because he has no better options, and preserves his health through frequent naps.
My allegiance is to my future fellow alums... always has been.
HJS, you constantly complain about the crappy recruits who eventually enroll and will be future fellow alums. You're just as bad.
You just put him in a logic box.












claver2010 wrote:bignick33 wrote:What is our offensive philosophy?
Run, run, pass, punt.










Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests