ATLeagle {l Wrote}:This time the DC. Probably helps Jags' cause.
BCFAN94 {l Wrote}: Jags is still damaged goods.
ATLeagle {l Wrote}:This time the DC. Probably helps Jags' cause.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:The defense has been awful and Bates was demoted so Rah can call plays until next year when he moves to DC and we hire a real head coach.
Or so I'd like to think.
ATLeagle {l Wrote}:Logan is still with Tampa. My non Jags connected tipster from Tampa says that Morris is way in over his head, good with the players, bad with his fellow coaches, and is hitting the bottle hard.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so does your love for jags simply transfer transitively to logan or do you love logan outright too?
ATLeagle {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so does your love for jags simply transfer transitively to logan or do you love logan outright too?
I actually like Logan more than I like Jags. In fact when it looked like Logan might end up as our coach last year, I was pretty happy.
After the halfhearted search, my preference for internal hires would have been
1. Logan
2. Bicknell JR
3. Day
4. Bicknell SR
5. Gene D
6. John D
7. Jerry York
8. Baldwin
9. Father Leahy
10. Prof Heineman
11. Spaz
ATLeagle {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so does your love for jags simply transfer transitively to logan or do you love logan outright too?
I actually like Logan more than I like Jags. In fact when it looked like Logan might end up as our coach last year, I was pretty happy.
After the halfhearted search, my preference for internal hires would have been
1. Logan
2. Bicknell JR
3. Day
4. Bicknell SR
5. Gene D
6. John D
7. Jerry York
8. Baldwin
9. Father Leahy
10. Prof Heineman
11. Spaz
ATLeagle {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so does your love for jags simply transfer transitively to logan or do you love logan outright too?
I actually like Logan more than I like Jags. In fact when it looked like Logan might end up as our coach last year, I was pretty happy.
After the halfhearted search, my preference for internal hires would have been
1. Logan
2. Bicknell JR
3. Day
4. Bicknell SR
5. Gene D
6. John D
7. Jerry York
8. Baldwin
9. Father Leahy
10. Prof Heineman
11. The employee at the Rat who slams his cart into everyone.
12. Spaz
13. Flutie
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:ATLeagle {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so does your love for jags simply transfer transitively to logan or do you love logan outright too?
I actually like Logan more than I like Jags. In fact when it looked like Logan might end up as our coach last year, I was pretty happy.
After the halfhearted search, my preference for internal hires would have been
1. Logan
2. Bicknell JR
3. Day
4. Bicknell SR
5. Gene D
6. John D
7. Jerry York
8. Baldwin
9. Father Leahy
10. Prof Heineman
11. The employee at the Rat who slams his cart into everyone.
12. Spaz
13. Flutie
Fixed
hansen {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:ATLeagle {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so does your love for jags simply transfer transitively to logan or do you love logan outright too?
I actually like Logan more than I like Jags. In fact when it looked like Logan might end up as our coach last year, I was pretty happy.
After the halfhearted search, my preference for internal hires would have been
1. Logan
2. Bicknell JR
3. Day
4. Bicknell SR
5. Gene D
6. John D
7. Jerry York
8. Baldwin
9. Father Leahy
10. Prof Heineman
11. The employee at the Rat who slams his cart into everyone.
12. Spaz
13. Flutie
Fixed
i was always a little concerned about that guy. he always seemed just a little too angry.
HJS {l Wrote}:I am in agreement with ATL on this. I always liked Logan more than Jags. Hell... the only reason I really liked the Jags hire in the first place was because he brought Logan with him.
ATLeagle {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so does your love for jags simply transfer transitively to logan or do you love logan outright too?
I actually like Logan more than I like Jags. In fact when it looked like Logan might end up as our coach last year, I was pretty happy.
After the halfhearted search, my preference for internal hires would have been
1. Logan
2. Bicknell JR
3. Day
4. Bicknell SR
5. Gene D
6. John D
7. Jerry York
8. Baldwin
9. Father Leahy
10. Prof Heineman
11. Spaz
h2o {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:I am in agreement with ATL on this. I always liked Logan more than Jags. Hell... the only reason I really liked the Jags hire in the first place was because he brought Logan with him.
So you never liked Jiggsie. I knew it.
HJS {l Wrote}:h2o {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:I am in agreement with ATL on this. I always liked Logan more than Jags. Hell... the only reason I really liked the Jags hire in the first place was because he brought Logan with him.
So you never liked Jiggsie. I knew it.
I liked Jags. I thought he was a good front man and did a good job motivating the team. However, I always knew the Xs and Os (i.e. the men behind the curtain) were Spaz and Logan. I would not have cared one little bit if Jags was canned and Logan was promoted (like what was initially reported by ESPN on that fateful evening as we were beating UNC).
bignick33 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:h2o {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:I am in agreement with ATL on this. I always liked Logan more than Jags. Hell... the only reason I really liked the Jags hire in the first place was because he brought Logan with him.
So you never liked Jiggsie. I knew it.
I liked Jags. I thought he was a good front man and did a good job motivating the team. However, I always knew the Xs and Os (i.e. the men behind the curtain) were Spaz and Logan. I would not have cared one little bit if Jags was canned and Logan was promoted (like what was initially reported by ESPN on that fateful evening as we were beating UNC).
Let's face it: Jags was and is a raging dickhead. This is a fact that that is often revised out of the history of the coaching change. But, the Jags/Spaz/Logan combination was pretty much a dream-team for BC, and it's a dAmn shame that it couldn't last. Bottom line, the program was stronger upon Jags' departure than it was on his arrival.
Spaz has no excuses not to be in the 10-11 win range multiple times over the next four or five years, when the 2008 talent matures (no homo), and when he is able to fill in the few but obvious holes in the roster (QB, D-Line, WR to a lesser extent). Incidentally, offensive recruiting has been better this year than defensive recruiting. Also, 8 or 9 wins in a rebuilding year, with no QB, is pretty fricken good. That being said, year 1 was never make-or-break; judgment will occur based on what happens in years 2, 3, and 4.
hansen {l Wrote}:bignick33 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:h2o {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:I am in agreement with ATL on this. I always liked Logan more than Jags. Hell... the only reason I really liked the Jags hire in the first place was because he brought Logan with him.
So you never liked Jiggsie. I knew it.
I liked Jags. I thought he was a good front man and did a good job motivating the team. However, I always knew the Xs and Os (i.e. the men behind the curtain) were Spaz and Logan. I would not have cared one little bit if Jags was canned and Logan was promoted (like what was initially reported by ESPN on that fateful evening as we were beating UNC).
Let's face it: Jags was and is a raging dickhead. This is a fact that that is often revised out of the history of the coaching change. But, the Jags/Spaz/Logan combination was pretty much a dream-team for BC, and it's a dAmn shame that it couldn't last. Bottom line, the program was stronger upon Jags' departure than it was on his arrival.
Spaz has no excuses not to be in the 10-11 win range multiple times over the next four or five years, when the 2008 talent matures (no homo), and when he is able to fill in the few but obvious holes in the roster (QB, D-Line, WR to a lesser extent). Incidentally, offensive recruiting has been better this year than defensive recruiting. Also, 8 or 9 wins in a rebuilding year, with no QB, is pretty fricken good. That being said, year 1 was never make-or-break; judgment will occur based on what happens in years 2, 3, and 4.
barring major injuries, anything less than an Atlantic division title next year is a disapointment.
bignick33 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:h2o {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:I am in agreement with ATL on this. I always liked Logan more than Jags. Hell... the only reason I really liked the Jags hire in the first place was because he brought Logan with him.
So you never liked Jiggsie. I knew it.
I liked Jags. I thought he was a good front man and did a good job motivating the team. However, I always knew the Xs and Os (i.e. the men behind the curtain) were Spaz and Logan. I would not have cared one little bit if Jags was canned and Logan was promoted (like what was initially reported by ESPN on that fateful evening as we were beating UNC).
Let's face it: Jags was and is a raging dickhead. This is a fact that that is often revised out of the history of the coaching change. But, the Jags/Spaz/Logan combination was pretty much a dream-team for BC, and it's a dAmn shame that it couldn't last. Bottom line, the program was stronger upon Jags' departure than it was on his arrival.
Spaz has no excuses not to be in the 10-11 win range multiple times over the next four or five years, when the 2008 talent matures (no homo), and when he is able to fill in the few but obvious holes in the roster (QB, D-Line, WR to a lesser extent). Incidentally, offensive recruiting has been better this year than defensive recruiting. Also, 8 or 9 wins in a rebuilding year, with no QB, is pretty fricken good. That being said, year 1 was never make-or-break; judgment will occur based on what happens in years 2, 3, and 4.
HJS {l Wrote}:2. We haven't arrived at the 8 to 9 win level yet. I have serious doubts about this weekend.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests