DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:Dick - what are your sources saying about Jurk’s injury?
Did he get hurt on the sideline (or bathroom)? He wasn't favoring it at all on his last possession.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:Dick - what are your sources saying about Jurk’s injury?
Did he get hurt on the sideline (or bathroom)? He wasn't favoring it at all on his last possession.
I believe he hurt it when he got smoked at the goal line and came out of the game. He wasn't favoring it on the next play because he was Grosel.
Bunratty {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:Dick - what are your sources saying about Jurk’s injury?
Did he get hurt on the sideline (or bathroom)? He wasn't favoring it at all on his last possession.
I believe he hurt it when he got smoked at the goal line and came out of the game. He wasn't favoring it on the next play because he was Grosel.
That was Grosel who got smoked at the goal line. Jurk had been out for a few plays before that. The stellar Gresh and Co. announcers missed all of that.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Bunratty {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:Dick - what are your sources saying about Jurk’s injury?
Did he get hurt on the sideline (or bathroom)? He wasn't favoring it at all on his last possession.
I believe he hurt it when he got smoked at the goal line and came out of the game. He wasn't favoring it on the next play because he was Grosel.
That was Grosel who got smoked at the goal line. Jurk had been out for a few plays before that. The stellar Gresh and Co. announcers missed all of that.
That was Grossell for that entire possession. Jurk never came back in after the Sinkfield TD.
hansen {l Wrote}:A lot of stupid negativity in this thread. We played super vanilla in this game so future opponents couldn't get good tape on us. Grosel prob didn't take many snaps with the 1s which hurts any performance. Pre-snap penalties were bad but it's only 1 game and Hafley has made it clear that those will get cleaned up. Grosel didn't play awful considering. I only thought he really only had 2 bad plays... the missed TD in the end zone was the worst went he sailed it over the receivers head and there was another pass to the right side where the guy was open and Dennis just missed him otherwise I thought he played well enough to beat most ACC teams. Also, the OL looked good yesterday opening some massive holes for Garwo & co. to run through. Also, thought Garwo looked solid, nice agility and vision, but maybe lacking speed once breaking into the next level.
it's only the second week and I'm sure this team will only improve as the season goes on.
innocentbystander {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:A lot of stupid negativity in this thread. We played super vanilla in this game so future opponents couldn't get good tape on us. Grosel prob didn't take many snaps with the 1s which hurts any performance. Pre-snap penalties were bad but it's only 1 game and Hafley has made it clear that those will get cleaned up. Grosel didn't play awful considering. I only thought he really only had 2 bad plays... the missed TD in the end zone was the worst went he sailed it over the receivers head and there was another pass to the right side where the guy was open and Dennis just missed him otherwise I thought he played well enough to beat most ACC teams. Also, the OL looked good yesterday opening some massive holes for Garwo & co. to run through. Also, thought Garwo looked solid, nice agility and vision, but maybe lacking speed once breaking into the next level.
it's only the second week and I'm sure this team will only improve as the season goes on.
+5 hansen, this is my thought. I'm glad you said it.
The negativity is very stupid. So BC only beat a shit team by 3 scores? BFD. That is no reason to bitch. Imagine how you'd feel right now if you were a Florida State or an Ohio State fan?
hansen {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Bunratty {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:Dick - what are your sources saying about Jurk’s injury?
Did he get hurt on the sideline (or bathroom)? He wasn't favoring it at all on his last possession.
I believe he hurt it when he got smoked at the goal line and came out of the game. He wasn't favoring it on the next play because he was Grosel.
That was Grosel who got smoked at the goal line. Jurk had been out for a few plays before that. The stellar Gresh and Co. announcers missed all of that.
That was Grossell for that entire possession. Jurk never came back in after the Sinkfield TD.
Teddy was being facetious.
innocentbystander {l Wrote}:
Still no news on Jurkovec, positive or negative.
HJS {l Wrote}:“Doctors getting together to give a prognosis” means broken bones requiring surgery. Effing luck of the Irish… we saved them from having to rely on an eggshell skull player. Wonder if we’ll see the freshmen get some run.
HJS {l Wrote}:“Doctors getting together to give a prognosis” means broken bones requiring surgery. Effing luck of the Irish… we saved them from having to rely on an eggshell skull player. Wonder if we’ll see the freshmen get some run.
Rich Thompson {l Wrote}:Boston College starting quarterback Phil Jurkovec underwent a medical evaluation on Sunday on his injured right wrist.
BC coach Jeff Hafley will likely release the details of the exam following Tuesday’s practice, but appeared optimistic Jurkovec will be available for next Saturday’s game at Temple.
HJS {l Wrote}:innocentbystander {l Wrote}:
Still no news on Jurkovec, positive or negative.
Just like last year, no news on Jurk means he’s done.
“Doctors getting together to give a prognosis” means broken bones requiring surgery. Effing luck of the Irish… we saved them from having to rely on an eggshell skull player. Wonder if we’ll see the freshmen get some run.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests