BC923 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The game where we needed the D to step up, they surrendered their worst performance.
When you’re wishing Mike Palmer could play you’re in rough shape
hansen {l Wrote}:UVA sucks, we should not be losing this game
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:Embarrassing
This isn’t embarrassing without your starting QB and RB. The defense has been bad all season and having to start Grosel is a direct reflection of Daz’s QB recruiting (or lack thereof).
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:BC923 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The game where we needed the D to step up, they surrendered their worst performance.
When you’re wishing Mike Palmer could play you’re in rough shape
I’m here. This D is horrible.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Is that really their fight song???????????
MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:Must be a sight to see in a packed stadium.
eaglesfan06 {l Wrote}:The fact that we have thrown 2 INTS that led to 14 points for UVa with UVa's atrocious DBs is embarrassing.
eaglesfan06 {l Wrote}:The fact that we have thrown 2 INTS that led to 14 points for UVa with UVa's atrocious DBs is embarrassing.
HJS {l Wrote}:eaglesfan06 {l Wrote}:The fact that we have thrown 2 INTS that led to 14 points for UVa with UVa's atrocious DBs is embarrassing.
That’s a stupid take to absolve our shitty D.
Both INTs stopped BC drives that would’ve likely led to points. But, the D subsequently surrendered 14 points as those drives each averaged 90 yards. Points off of turnovers is a stat that speaks to granting your opponent great field position and preventing your D from getting a rest. Neither are at play when you have long drives that end in a turnover deep in the opponent’s territory. Defensively, that’s no different than having a punt downed inside the 10.
hansen {l Wrote}:CAN ANYONE ON THIS TEAM FUCKING TACKLE?
HJS {l Wrote}:eaglesfan06 {l Wrote}:The fact that we have thrown 2 INTS that led to 14 points for UVa with UVa's atrocious DBs is embarrassing.
That’s a stupid take to absolve our shitty D.
Both INTs stopped BC drives that would’ve likely led to points. But, the D subsequently surrendered 14 points as those drives each averaged 90 yards. Points off of turnovers is a stat that speaks to granting your opponent great field position and preventing your D from getting a rest. Neither are at play when you have long drives that end in a turnover deep in the opponent’s territory. Defensively, that’s no different than having a punt downed inside the 10.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:eaglesfan06 {l Wrote}:The fact that we have thrown 2 INTS that led to 14 points for UVa with UVa's atrocious DBs is embarrassing.
That’s a stupid take to absolve our shitty D.
Both INTs stopped BC drives that would’ve likely led to points. But, the D subsequently surrendered 14 points as those drives each averaged 90 yards. Points off of turnovers is a stat that speaks to granting your opponent great field position and preventing your D from getting a rest. Neither are at play when you have long drives that end in a turnover deep in the opponent’s territory. Defensively, that’s no different than having a punt downed inside the 10.
We need better talent on D. I can’t even evaluate the coaching with this front 4 and set of DBs.
eaglesfan06 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:eaglesfan06 {l Wrote}:The fact that we have thrown 2 INTS that led to 14 points for UVa with UVa's atrocious DBs is embarrassing.
That’s a stupid take to absolve our shitty D.
Both INTs stopped BC drives that would’ve likely led to points. But, the D subsequently surrendered 14 points as those drives each averaged 90 yards. Points off of turnovers is a stat that speaks to granting your opponent great field position and preventing your D from getting a rest. Neither are at play when you have long drives that end in a turnover deep in the opponent’s territory. Defensively, that’s no different than having a punt downed inside the 10.
We need better talent on D. I can’t even evaluate the coaching with this front 4 and set of DBs.
Don't forget about the linebackers. No one has got more air time for doing absolutely nothing than Max Richardson.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:I’ll rescind my question on the bowl game. I’m good never seeing this D play again.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 245 guests