ATLeagle {l Wrote}:Day has benefited from transfer waivers so of course he will be in favor of them. My guess is Notre Dame is will cooperate eventually. They need the ACC this year and are likely to play BC.
hansen {l Wrote}:ATLeagle {l Wrote}:Day has benefited from transfer waivers so of course he will be in favor of them. My guess is Notre Dame is will cooperate eventually. They need the ACC this year and are likely to play BC.
In response to this, I just wrote the best post of my goddam life and then my iPad battery died. Motherfucker!
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:ATLeagle {l Wrote}:Day has benefited from transfer waivers so of course he will be in favor of them. My guess is Notre Dame is will cooperate eventually. They need the ACC this year and are likely to play BC.
In response to this, I just wrote the best post of my goddam life and then my iPad battery died. Motherfucker!
it shouldn't be that difficult to retype "i am leaving and never coming back."
OCs_Inner_Eagle {l Wrote}:StratEagle {l Wrote}:BC923 {l Wrote}:Per twitter, Jaelen Gill has been granted immediate eligibility should we play this year. Can’t imagine what the hang up with Jurk is
Rumored that Ryan Day vouched for Gill's case, while Notre Dame did the complete opposite. No idea if true though.
I believe both happened. With Gill, claver2010 at 7:53PM yesterday points out that Gill didn't fit Ryan Day's offense and was stuck behind extremely talented players anywhere he'd play. If Day threw his full support behind Gill's effort to transfer, citing these factors, I could see the NCAA doing the easy thing and going along with the waiver. Why would Day do this? It indicates that he has the best interest of his players and staff at heart, which helps his recruiting long-term. Look at how classy and secure Day appeared to be with Burrow and Hafley. He also has a soft spot for BC, and knows it's unlikely this will blow up on him personally unless BC somehow meets OSU in the CFP. We hope for a 'ship, but obviously unlikely in the next couple of years.
Phil Jurkovec's in a different situation. At the time of the transfer, it was clear his departure was related to his treatment at ND. It appears Kelly (and Tommy Rees) had elevated what was said to be the less talented QB, rather than focusing the offense on the skills of the more talented one. Something akin to how the Pittsburgh Steelers demonstrated John Bunting's misuse of Willie Parker at UNC.
It's one thing to maintain a scheme to serve multiple 5* players, rather than change for a single 5* player. It's entirely different to maintain an offense to serve a less talented QB, rather than to adjust so that you fit the skills of a more talented QB.
ND was never going to cooperate in Jurkovec's transfer. Doing so undercuts ND's depth at QB. More importantly, Jurkovec's success will redound negatively on Kelly and Rees. That will be moreso the case if Jurkovec plays well THIS season and shows what Kelly (and Rees) could have done with the ND offense--if only they had been willing to change the scheme to suit their personnel.
So ND fights, forcing BC and Jurkovec to decide how far they want to go to secure the transfer. Do they want to air all the dirty laundry, knowing ND will fight all the harder? That kind of conflict intimidates the NCAA, and will lead them to drag this out as they try to decide what to do. Probably the best option for them is to wait and see if CFB gets canceled before they have to decide.
Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:I do think there is a college education bubble that is in the process of bursting—it was coming anyway, but t DXC he Wuhan Virus has sped the process up considerably. A lot of small liberal arts colleges are going away. Non-flagship state schools are going to largely go away. Private universities are going to have to get less expensive with some exceptions. And everyone is going to have to offer cheaper on-line options—even places like Harvard, Princeton, MIT, Stanford are going to have to offer at least some graduate degrees in a cheaper on-line model, especially in the humanities because the value proposition can’t justify the current cost model.
claver2010 {l Wrote}:video of halfye's zoom call with donors re recruiting
talked about process, added 2 FTEs to recruiting staff when hired, every assistant's #1 job is recruiting.
don't get caught up in stars but just scratching surface on what he's looking to do
claver2010 {l Wrote}:video of halfye's zoom call with donors re recruiting
talked about process, added 2 FTEs to recruiting staff when hired, every assistant's #1 job is recruiting.
claver2010 {l Wrote}:video of halfye's zoom call with donors re recruiting
talked about process, added 2 FTEs to recruiting staff when hired, every assistant's #1 job is recruiting.
don't get caught up in stars but just scratching surface on what he's looking to do
claver2010 {l Wrote}:yeah this season ain't happening in the fall
claver2010 {l Wrote}:yeah this season ain't happening in the fall
ATLeagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:yeah this season ain't happening in the fall
I am holding out for greed. A football less fall will wreck college sports. Lots of cushy administrators are going to be out on their asses and non-rev sports are going to get cut to the bone.
The pro leagues have billionaire owners who can backstop things and use covid to control future costs. College isn't the same model.
OCs_Inner_Eagle {l Wrote}:ATLeagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:yeah this season ain't happening in the fall
I am holding out for greed. A football less fall will wreck college sports. Lots of cushy administrators are going to be out on their asses and non-rev sports are going to get cut to the bone.
The pro leagues have billionaire owners who can backstop things and use covid to control future costs. College isn't the same model.
Pro players all have unions to negotiate on behalf of their collective interests. Colleges have a lot more latitude to pursue such greed.
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:OCs_Inner_Eagle {l Wrote}:ATLeagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:yeah this season ain't happening in the fall
I am holding out for greed. A football less fall will wreck college sports. Lots of cushy administrators are going to be out on their asses and non-rev sports are going to get cut to the bone.
The pro leagues have billionaire owners who can backstop things and use covid to control future costs. College isn't the same model.
Pro players all have unions to negotiate on behalf of their collective interests. Colleges have a lot more latitude to pursue such greed.
And you'll notice that pro players are back playing before the college players - which tells you something about their collective interests.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:OCs_Inner_Eagle {l Wrote}:ATLeagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:yeah this season ain't happening in the fall
I am holding out for greed. A football less fall will wreck college sports. Lots of cushy administrators are going to be out on their asses and non-rev sports are going to get cut to the bone.
The pro leagues have billionaire owners who can backstop things and use covid to control future costs. College isn't the same model.
Pro players all have unions to negotiate on behalf of their collective interests. Colleges have a lot more latitude to pursue such greed.
And you'll notice that pro players are back playing before the college players - which tells you something about their collective interests.
What college sports plays in July?
claver2010 {l Wrote}:acc just released their plan
10+1 OOC must be home or in state
ND full football member, all revenue shared equally
games start week after labor day
edit: opponents
Home: GT, VIlle, UNC, ND, Pitt
Away: Clem, Duke, Cuse, UVA, VT
claver2010 {l Wrote}:acc just released their plan
10+1 OOC must be home or in state
ND full football member, all revenue shared equally
games start week after labor day
edit: opponents
Home: GT, VIlle, UNC, ND, Pitt
Away: Clem, Duke, Cuse, UVA, VT
JesuitIvy {l Wrote}:Who is our OOC then? Is it UMass or bust?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 197 guests