Los {l Wrote}:Can Schiano improve our recruiting rankings in the ACC from the 12-14 range to say 6-8? If the answer is yes then IMO he's worth a shot. We've never even sniffed that type of recruiting "success". As someone else on here noted, if he can clean up in NJ and eastern PA it might be a way to get this program to the next level.
BCMurt09 {l Wrote}:Schiano was 68-67 overall and 28-48 in conference (the Big East Conference) at Rutgers.
HJS {l Wrote}:BCMurt09 {l Wrote}:Schiano was 68-67 overall and 28-48 in conference (the Big East Conference) at Rutgers.
How did Rutgers do before and after his tenure? People acting like RU is just a normal football program.
If the choice is really Schiano vs Daz, I'm picking Schiano every time.
JesuitIvy {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:BCMurt09 {l Wrote}:Schiano was 68-67 overall and 28-48 in conference (the Big East Conference) at Rutgers.
How did Rutgers do before and after his tenure? People acting like RU is just a normal football program.
If the choice is really Schiano vs Daz, I'm picking Schiano every time.
I agree. Rutgers is a blackhole since Schiano and was a blackhole before. The only reason I'd be okay with Schiano is just on his record at the Rutgers, even if the Big East was a shell of its former self. That was a magical job (that said, if Schiano was torpedoed at Tennessee b/c of the Sandusky connection, it's gotta be fantasy that he's in the mix for BC, IMO)
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:JesuitIvy {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:BCMurt09 {l Wrote}:Schiano was 68-67 overall and 28-48 in conference (the Big East Conference) at Rutgers.
How did Rutgers do before and after his tenure? People acting like RU is just a normal football program.
If the choice is really Schiano vs Daz, I'm picking Schiano every time.
I agree. Rutgers is a blackhole since Schiano and was a blackhole before. The only reason I'd be okay with Schiano is just on his record at the Rutgers, even if the Big East was a shell of its former self. That was a magical job (that said, if Schiano was torpedoed at Tennessee b/c of the Sandusky connection, it's gotta be fantasy that he's in the mix for BC, IMO)
Rutgers was UConn level of bad before Schiano showed up.
HJS {l Wrote}:Schiano was the coach at Rutgers for 11 years. His time in Piscataway was an incredible anomaly when viewed through the last 30 years of Rutgers football.
While at Rutgers, Schiano was 68-67 (50.4%) overall and had a conference record of 28-48 (36.8%).
The other 19 years, Rutgers was 76-140-1 (35.2%) overall and had a conference record of 30-100-1 (23.1%) (this number would be lower but RU wasn't in a conference in Graber's inaugural 3-8 campaign)
Furthermore, Schiano had won 8 or more games 5 of his 11 seasons. Rutgers won 8 or more games just twice in the other 19. Those 2 occurred right after his departure to the NFL with the players that he recruited.
Rutgers futility is otherworldly. You may not like Schiano, that's fine. You may like Daz better, that's fine. But, to pretend what Schiano accomplished at Rutgers wasn't impressive is simply ignoring an inconvenient truth.
HJS {l Wrote}:Schiano was the coach at Rutgers for 11 years. His time in Piscataway was an incredible anomaly when viewed through the last 30 years of Rutgers football.
While at Rutgers, Schiano was 68-67 (50.4%) overall and had a conference record of 28-48 (36.8%).
The other 19 years, Rutgers was 76-140-1 (35.2%) overall and had a conference record of 30-100-1 (23.1%) (this number would be lower but RU wasn't in a conference in Graber's inaugural 3-8 campaign)
Furthermore, Schiano had won 8 or more games 5 of his 11 seasons. Rutgers won 8 or more games just twice in the other 19. Those 2 occurred right after his departure to the NFL with the players that he recruited.
Rutgers futility is otherworldly. You may not like Schiano, that's fine. You may like Daz better, that's fine. But, to pretend what Schiano accomplished at Rutgers wasn't impressive is simply ignoring an inconvenient truth.
HJS {l Wrote}:https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/1199336263788175360?s=20
It is a bit frustrating for us to be still dealing with a hiring we never wanted while the Board fave proving to be a big effing miss
ZBC2001 {l Wrote}:Will we have something extra to be thankful for tomorrow?
https://www.si.com/college/bostoncollege/football/boston-college-steve-addazio-rutgers-coaches-hot-seat/
hansen {l Wrote}:ATL put up a good candidate name: Mike Reed '95 DB Coach for Clemson.
I like the idea of hiring him as head coach IF we pony up money to get an experienced/talented OC.
HJS {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:ATL put up a good candidate name: Mike Reed '95 DB Coach for Clemson.
I like the idea of hiring him as head coach IF we pony up money to get an experienced/talented OC.
Name one program who would have interest in hiring Mike Reed as a head coach? He's never been an coordinator. Further, while I wouldn't call his press conferences Diaco-like, I would say they aren't particularly exciting. Basically, his only qualification for the job is diploma from 25 years ago.
hansen {l Wrote}:The sharks in the water smell blood:
Please Leave Steve Addazio
by Jamal Burke
https://www.wblzmedia.com/2019/11/27/bo ... ve-please/
BC923 {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:The sharks in the water smell blood:
Please Leave Steve Addazio
by Jamal Burke
https://www.wblzmedia.com/2019/11/27/bo ... ve-please/
There’s always been whispers about how the former players hate him, but it’s been mostly under wraps. If Addazio survives this year somehow he’s severely hobbled
hansen {l Wrote}:BC923 {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:The sharks in the water smell blood:
Please Leave Steve Addazio
by Jamal Burke
https://www.wblzmedia.com/2019/11/27/bo ... ve-please/
There’s always been whispers about how the former players hate him, but it’s been mostly under wraps. If Addazio survives this year somehow he’s severely hobbled
To play college football, you got to be a highly competitive person. So, I imagine the losing must eat at them in a way I can only imagine.
hansen {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:ATL put up a good candidate name: Mike Reed '95 DB Coach for Clemson.
I like the idea of hiring him as head coach IF we pony up money to get an experienced/talented OC.
Name one program who would have interest in hiring Mike Reed as a head coach? He's never been an coordinator. Further, while I wouldn't call his press conferences Diaco-like, I would say they aren't particularly exciting. Basically, his only qualification for the job is diploma from 25 years ago.
That’s because you are delusional thinking we are gonna get a good hire. He will be no worse than the terrible hire that Leahy agrees to.
Coughlin held an impromptu press conference at the team’s facility on Wednesday. The reasoning is not yet known.
However, Coughlin was asked directly whether he plans on returning next season. The Super Bowl winner ignored the question, simply indicating that there’s five more games left in the season.
MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:ATL put up a good candidate name: Mike Reed '95 DB Coach for Clemson.
I like the idea of hiring him as head coach IF we pony up money to get an experienced/talented OC.
Name one program who would have interest in hiring Mike Reed as a head coach? He's never been an coordinator. Further, while I wouldn't call his press conferences Diaco-like, I would say they aren't particularly exciting. Basically, his only qualification for the job is diploma from 25 years ago.
That’s because you are delusional thinking we are gonna get a good hire. He will be no worse than the terrible hire that Leahy agrees to.
Was Swinney a coordinator before he got the Clemson gig? Coulda sworn he was WR coach.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 135 guests