Page 1 of 2
Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:20 amby claver2010
Hopefully similar to hc / umass last year where it's 1-2 quarters for anthony and then vallecce, groessel, sam johnson time and a max of 10 carries for aj.
Mcduffie despite being listed starter didn't play last week, he's listed as OR this week w sparacio:
https://bceagles.com/documents/2019/8/2 ... _Notes.pdf (no meatbaum)
i didn't notice any new injuries on saturday
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:55 amby BC923
This should be a pretty easy one.
I’ll be watching the DL. Most of our pressure came on some interesting blitzes, which was nice to see after the pretty vanilla defense we played under Reid. I don’t think we’ll put that on tape against Richmond. I want to see some more plays made by the DEs against Richmond. I was actually impressed by the DTs, especially Rayam, but we need some improvement on the edge.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:23 pmby NotoriousOrange
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hopefully similar to hc / umass last year where it's 1-2 quarters for anthony and then vallecce, groessel, sam johnson time and a max of 10 carries for aj.
Mcduffie despite being listed starter didn't play last week, he's listed as OR this week w sparacio:
https://bceagles.com/documents/2019/8/2 ... _Notes.pdf (no meatbaum)
i didn't notice any new injuries on saturday
Claver, McDuffie was not in pads for the VTech game he was on the sidelines wearing his jersey.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:32 pmby mod6A
NotoriousOrange {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hopefully similar to hc / umass last year where it's 1-2 quarters for anthony and then vallecce, groessel, sam johnson time and a max of 10 carries for aj.
Mcduffie despite being listed starter didn't play last week, he's listed as OR this week w sparacio:
https://bceagles.com/documents/2019/8/2 ... _Notes.pdf (no meatbaum)
i didn't notice any new injuries on saturday
Claver, McDuffie was not in pads for the VTech game he was on the sidelines wearing his jersey.
they beat jacksonville 38 - 19 last week. whatever that means.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvFuUaCe8eY 
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:41 pmby BCMurt09
My younger cousin was going to BC then switched to Richmond. Then switched again to Wake Forest.
I hope we rocket ship both teams because I’m spiteful.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 2:15 pmby hansen
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 2:30 pmby DomingoOrtiz
Did McDuffie dress Saturday?
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 3:05 pmby blueline
It will be automatic W and I am looking ahead to the Kansas Friday night game.
It's just weird to play 2/3 home games in September
The 2nd half of season schedule is brutal basically all road games almost
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 3:22 pmby 2001Eagle
Sparacio looked very good. Solid in coverage
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 3:35 pmby Logitano
BCMurt09 {l Wrote}:My younger cousin was going to BC then switched to Richmond. Then switched again to Wake Forest.
I hope we rocket ship both teams because I’m spiteful.
This.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 5:47 pmby eepstein0
Richmond is bad for a FCS team. This is going to be a beating
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 6:56 pmby claver2010
needless to say bc has upgraded from vinnybeaconfavrebluetomato:
https://twitter.com/BCFootball/status/1 ... 6176619524
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:42 pmby RegalBCeagle
I'm embarrassed that Daz thinks that was a "statement win." We beat a mediocre to bad team by 7 points with a 5-1 TO margin. It's even more pathetic that Daz puckered his sphincter at halftime and employed the play not to lose game. That same pussified attitude will surely cost the team at least 2 possible wins.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 11:03 pmby twballgame9
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Richmond is bad for a FCS team. This is going to be a beating
You're a moron.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 8:00 amby eepstein0
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Richmond is bad for a FCS team. This is going to be a beating
You're a moron.
Huh?
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 8:59 amby flyingelvii
They were picked to finish 10th in the CAA preseason poll and sucked last year.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:30 amby NotoriousOrange
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Did McDuffie dress Saturday?
NotoriousOrange {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hopefully similar to hc / umass last year where it's 1-2 quarters for anthony and then vallecce, groessel, sam johnson time and a max of 10 carries for aj.
Mcduffie despite being listed starter didn't play last week, he's listed as OR this week w sparacio:
https://bceagles.com/documents/2019/8/2 ... _Notes.pdf (no meatbaum)
i didn't notice any new injuries on saturday
Claver, McDuffie was not in pads for the VTech game he was on the sidelines wearing his jersey.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:36 amby claver2010
daz said it's week to week w mcduffie
someone said he was walking w a pretty decent limp on saturday
i guess the moral is don't put much of any stock in the 2 deep
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 10:45 amby innocentbystander
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:I'm embarrassed that Daz thinks that was a "statement win." We beat a mediocre to bad team by 7 points with a 5-1 TO margin.
That mediocre to bad team wins 8 games this year.
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:It's even more pathetic that Daz puckered his sphincter at halftime and employed the play not to lose game.
That "pussified attitude" worked.
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:That same pussified attitude will surely cost the team at least 2 possible wins.
Going turtle with a 2 TD lead at half-time costing us at least 2 possible wins? Lets hope we have the opportunity to test that theory of yours.
I fucking hate Addazio. But I don't hate him for some of the reasons many of you here hate him. On game day, he's not a bad coach. He doesn't have much to work with and (at the moment) he is maximizing that production from mostly marginal players. The fact that all we have are mostly marginal players is the reason why I hate him.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 11:39 amby BC96
innocentbystander {l Wrote}:RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:I'm embarrassed that Daz thinks that was a "statement win." We beat a mediocre to bad team by 7 points with a 5-1 TO margin.
That mediocre to bad team wins 8 games this year.
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:It's even more pathetic that Daz puckered his sphincter at halftime and employed the play not to lose game.
That "pussified attitude" worked.
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:That same pussified attitude will surely cost the team at least 2 possible wins.
Going turtle with a 2 TD lead at half-time costing us at least 2 possible wins? Lets hope we have the opportunity to test that theory of yours.
I fucking hate Addazio. But I don't hate him for some of the reasons many of you here hate him. On game day, he's not a bad coach. He doesn't have much to work with and (at the moment) he is maximizing that production from mostly marginal players. The fact that all we have are mostly marginal players is the reason why I hate him.
He is not a bad game day coach, he is much worse than that. The 3 runs ups the middle at the end of the game were absurd; the only reason Virginia Tech didn't get the ball back with 75 second left is AJ Dillon was able to spin his way to a first down on 3rd and 8.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 11:40 amby BC923
Yes IB, our players are marginal because, while the NFL likes them, TGOSB is not such a fan. You’re right.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 11:58 amby eepstein0
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:They were picked to finish 10th in the CAA preseason poll and sucked last year.
Hence TWB is a moron
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:06 pmby Corporal Funishment
BC96 {l Wrote}:innocentbystander {l Wrote}:RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:It's even more pathetic that Daz puckered his sphincter at halftime and employed the play not to lose game.
That "pussified attitude" worked.
It also fails to work 1-3 times per year so it's bad on process grounds and results grounds
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:08 pmby innocentbystander
BC96 {l Wrote}:innocentbystander {l Wrote}:RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:I'm embarrassed that Daz thinks that was a "statement win." We beat a mediocre to bad team by 7 points with a 5-1 TO margin.
That mediocre to bad team wins 8 games this year.
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:It's even more pathetic that Daz puckered his sphincter at halftime and employed the play not to lose game.
That "pussified attitude" worked.
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:That same pussified attitude will surely cost the team at least 2 possible wins.
Going turtle with a 2 TD lead at half-time costing us at least 2 possible wins? Lets hope we have the opportunity to test that theory of yours.
I fucking hate Addazio. But I don't hate him for some of the reasons many of you here hate him. On game day, he's not a bad coach. He doesn't have much to work with and (at the moment) he is maximizing that production from mostly marginal players. The fact that all we have are mostly marginal players is the reason why I hate him.
He is not a bad game day coach, he is much worse than that. The 3 runs ups the middle at the end of the game were absurd; the only reason Virginia Tech didn't get the ball back with 75 second left is AJ Dillon was able to spin his way to a first down on 3rd and 8.
3 runs right up the middle, with 2 minutes to go, a 7 point lead, and a willingness to force your opponent to consume their 2 remaining time outs is exactly, PRECISELY the calls that needed to be made. 3 runs right up the middle are critical for a variety of reasons:
- It minimizes the likelihood of a fumble on hand-off almost all the way down to zero (which is most important)
- It forces the opponent to burn their time outs
- It guarantees the team on offense has the opportunity to take the most time off the clock in between plays (never out of bounds)
- It gives the offensive line confidence knowing that you have confidence in them and most of all
- one chance in three, you will break a tackle and get the first down and win the game (which is what happened)
Sometimes turtling and doing the most obvious thing, is the right thing to do. In Addazio's many painful losses (many, for they are legion) rarely is he losing because he is doing the most obvious thing, turtling. You are getting your bad BC coaches (and the reasons for their losses) mixed up. Unfortunately that list of bad coaches (and losses) is ALSO legion.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:15 pmby innocentbystander
One thing more, right now everyone posting on this board is HAPPY about BC football. Maybe we are not thrilled, maybe we are sour on the coach and our chances at making noise in the conference. But this week we are happy. We are not happy because BC is about to butcher Richmond. We are happy solely because BC beat vpi. It is comforting knowing that BC is 1-0 (the best they could possibly be) going into FCS week with Richmond. That is good. We all had a good weekend.
Complaining about turtling and doing the most likely thing in a vanilla ending to a game that BC won, that is just looking for a reason to be angry. Rest assured guys, we will have plenty of reasons to be angry with Addazio this year. This Saturday is not one of those reasons.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:21 pmby innocentbystander
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:flyingelvii {l Wrote}:They were picked to finish 10th in the CAA preseason poll and sucked last year.
Hence TWB is a moron
Seriously Epstein, put him on foe. He's just a troll.
Polls
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 1:38 pmby DomingoOrtiz
#40 in the AP and 37 in Coaches
Re: Polls
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 3:05 pmby DuchesneEast
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:#40 in the AP and 37 in Coaches
I was actually hoping for slightly better than that. I thought we had a good win vs a solid P5 program.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 4:30 pmby twballgame9
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:They were picked to finish 10th in the CAA preseason poll and sucked last year.
It's the best conference in FCS. The worst CAA team is better than 70+% of FCS.
BC should romp but not because this is a bad FCS opponent.
Re: Richmond Week
Posted:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 4:33 pmby twballgame9
BC923 {l Wrote}:Yes IB, our players are marginal because, while the NFL likes them, TGOSB is not such a fan. You’re right.
This.
He'd tell you to foe him because he's just a troll, but I think he's a entertaining idiot.