MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:eagletx {l Wrote}:Though, I hope this easy lifting schedule doesn't come back and bite BC. FIRST OFFENSE, in game for 12 plays or some such. So they haven't played a full game after two games. My opinion, Brown needs work, regardless of opponent. He hasn't had a full season. Brotherhood sportsmanship and all considered, at least play real football for a half, then play audition football. Yeah, take Dillon out, play some other linemen, but leave in Brown to get some work. You left 1st D in for a half, why not the offense.
This game demonstrated that nondescript Division 2 cupcakes shouldn't be played except as a later season "off week" on the schedule. Going into week 3 BC hasn't faced any meaningful competition, and I question whether there's alot positive to be derived from it. Thankfully, its Wake, and not Clemson or VT next.
UMass has been competitive against the SEC teams it's played over the last 2-3 years. I think that 48-7 halftime lead is more impressive than people realize. Even Holy Cross only lost to UConn 27-20 last year. Are you complaining about BC being dominant? The schedule gradually gets harder and there is no reason why BC shouldn't be ready for Wake, Purdue and Temple after these two routs.
sader87 {l Wrote}:You don't get it TRE.....it's college football....no one around here really cares if you beat Wake, Raleigh Community
College or UMass.....playing Holy Cross means something to the alumni of both schools.
HJS {l Wrote}:The arguments in this thread are being conflated. Some are arguing that playing HC is better than playing other FCS schools. Others, in response, are saying it’s stupid to play HC because they are FCS.
In a world where Bama plays the likes of Savannah St, I’m fine with HC showing up on the schedule and would even be fine with their presence being more frequent than that of UNH, Maine or URI.
Btw, to our friend sader, these games aren’t meant to be competitive. They are meant to be what they were today... an easy win where no one got hurt and young kids saw a good amount of reps. If this series ever gets competitive, it ends.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The arguments in this thread are being conflated. Some are arguing that playing HC is better than playing other FCS schools. Others, in response, are saying it’s stupid to play HC because they are FCS.
In a world where Bama plays the likes of Savannah St, I’m fine with HC showing up on the schedule and would even be fine with their presence being more frequent than that of UNH, Maine or URI.
Btw, to our friend sader, these games aren’t meant to be competitive. They are meant to be what they were today... an easy win where no one got hurt and young kids saw a good amount of reps. If this series ever gets competitive, it ends.
There are different levels of fcs in terms of athletes. Holy Cross is on the wrong end. Play URI if you want FCS. Or just play UConn and UMass.
HJS {l Wrote}:They are meant to be what they were today... an easy win where no one got hurt and young kids saw a good amount of reps.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The arguments in this thread are being conflated. Some are arguing that playing HC is better than playing other FCS schools. Others, in response, are saying it’s stupid to play HC because they are FCS.
In a world where Bama plays the likes of Savannah St, I’m fine with HC showing up on the schedule and would even be fine with their presence being more frequent than that of UNH, Maine or URI.
Btw, to our friend sader, these games aren’t meant to be competitive. They are meant to be what they were today... an easy win where no one got hurt and young kids saw a good amount of reps. If this series ever gets competitive, it ends.
There are different levels of fcs in terms of athletes. Holy Cross is on the wrong end. Play URI if you want FCS. Or just play UConn and UMass.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The arguments in this thread are being conflated. Some are arguing that playing HC is better than playing other FCS schools. Others, in response, are saying it’s stupid to play HC because they are FCS.
In a world where Bama plays the likes of Savannah St, I’m fine with HC showing up on the schedule and would even be fine with their presence being more frequent than that of UNH, Maine or URI.
Btw, to our friend sader, these games aren’t meant to be competitive. They are meant to be what they were today... an easy win where no one got hurt and young kids saw a good amount of reps. If this series ever gets competitive, it ends.
There are different levels of fcs in terms of athletes. Holy Cross is on the wrong end. Play URI if you want FCS. Or just play UConn and UMass.
this
HJS {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The arguments in this thread are being conflated. Some are arguing that playing HC is better than playing other FCS schools. Others, in response, are saying it’s stupid to play HC because they are FCS.
In a world where Bama plays the likes of Savannah St, I’m fine with HC showing up on the schedule and would even be fine with their presence being more frequent than that of UNH, Maine or URI.
Btw, to our friend sader, these games aren’t meant to be competitive. They are meant to be what they were today... an easy win where no one got hurt and young kids saw a good amount of reps. If this series ever gets competitive, it ends.
There are different levels of fcs in terms of athletes. Holy Cross is on the wrong end. Play URI if you want FCS. Or just play UConn and UMass.
this
BC’s scheduling formula is: 1 Big 5 conference, 1 FCS and 2 mid-majors. That has been our formula since going to 12 (exception being 3 mid-majors last year and 2 FCS schools in 2015). It is essentially the same scheduling formula we’ve had since Henning was forced to run a gauntlet meant for Coughlin. It is essentially the same scheduling formula of most every Big 5 conference team. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The arguments in this thread are being conflated. Some are arguing that playing HC is better than playing other FCS schools. Others, in response, are saying it’s stupid to play HC because they are FCS.
In a world where Bama plays the likes of Savannah St, I’m fine with HC showing up on the schedule and would even be fine with their presence being more frequent than that of UNH, Maine or URI.
Btw, to our friend sader, these games aren’t meant to be competitive. They are meant to be what they were today... an easy win where no one got hurt and young kids saw a good amount of reps. If this series ever gets competitive, it ends.
There are different levels of fcs in terms of athletes. Holy Cross is on the wrong end. Play URI if you want FCS. Or just play UConn and UMass.
this
BC’s scheduling formula is: 1 Big 5 conference, 1 FCS and 2 mid-majors. That has been our formula since going to 12 (exception being 3 mid-majors last year and 2 FCS schools in 2015). It is essentially the same scheduling formula we’ve had since Henning was forced to run a gauntlet meant for Coughlin. It is essentially the same scheduling formula of most every Big 5 conference team. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.
Since this seems to be unnecessarily difficult to understand, FCS schools vary greatly and Holy Cross is on the wrong end of the spectrum to be in the mix. That end of FCS is closer to DIII than it is to the ACC. In football, that means a large size discrepancy and uncomfortable football.
Play Villanova or others from the Colonial. Don't play Holy Cross.
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The arguments in this thread are being conflated. Some are arguing that playing HC is better than playing other FCS schools. Others, in response, are saying it’s stupid to play HC because they are FCS.
In a world where Bama plays the likes of Savannah St, I’m fine with HC showing up on the schedule and would even be fine with their presence being more frequent than that of UNH, Maine or URI.
Btw, to our friend sader, these games aren’t meant to be competitive. They are meant to be what they were today... an easy win where no one got hurt and young kids saw a good amount of reps. If this series ever gets competitive, it ends.
There are different levels of fcs in terms of athletes. Holy Cross is on the wrong end. Play URI if you want FCS. Or just play UConn and UMass.
this
BC’s scheduling formula is: 1 Big 5 conference, 1 FCS and 2 mid-majors. That has been our formula since going to 12 (exception being 3 mid-majors last year and 2 FCS schools in 2015). It is essentially the same scheduling formula we’ve had since Henning was forced to run a gauntlet meant for Coughlin. It is essentially the same scheduling formula of most every Big 5 conference team. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.
Since this seems to be unnecessarily difficult to understand, FCS schools vary greatly and Holy Cross is on the wrong end of the spectrum to be in the mix. That end of FCS is closer to DIII than it is to the ACC. In football, that means a large size discrepancy and uncomfortable football.
Play Villanova or others from the Colonial. Don't play Holy Cross.
Holy Cross puts more fans in the seats than any other crappy game.
hansen {l Wrote}:No problem with playing HC. Better than UCONN. And if it packs the stadium even better.
We got an easy win that counted where our backups got meaningful action for almost the entire game. With this new 4 game rule, it’s imperative we use that to our maximum advantage. There was no reason for the starters to play more than the 12 plays. Who gives a shit that our starters have barely played yet? We’ve got ten games left... 3 of which are warmups for the other 7 that matter. This is a perfect scenario for this team to be successful later in the season.
Fuck all this “we are what we are” negativity. It reeks of whalepants bitching because they don’t get to watch good or popular opponents. “But I want to tailgate and then watch ND”. Fuck that. I want this team succeed during ACC play and we are setup perfectly for it. 2-0, no injuries, ranked just outside the top 25 at worst and even possibly in it. Now 3 real winnable games before the herat of the schedule. You literally could not have drawn up a better start for the year.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:No problem with playing HC. Better than UCONN. And if it packs the stadium even better.
We got an easy win that counted where our backups got meaningful action for almost the entire game. With this new 4 game rule, it’s imperative we use that to our maximum advantage. There was no reason for the starters to play more than the 12 plays. Who gives a shit that our starters have barely played yet? We’ve got ten games left... 3 of which are warmups for the other 7 that matter. This is a perfect scenario for this team to be successful later in the season.
Fuck all this “we are what we are” negativity. It reeks of whalepants bitching because they don’t get to watch good or popular opponents. “But I want to tailgate and then watch ND”. Fuck that. I want this team succeed during ACC play and we are setup perfectly for it. 2-0, no injuries, ranked just outside the top 25 at worst and even possibly in it. Now 3 real winnable games before the herat of the schedule. You literally could not have drawn up a better start for the year.
They are lucky no one got seriously hurt. That's what's missing. Its cringeworthy every play.
hansen {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:No problem with playing HC. Better than UCONN. And if it packs the stadium even better.
We got an easy win that counted where our backups got meaningful action for almost the entire game. With this new 4 game rule, it’s imperative we use that to our maximum advantage. There was no reason for the starters to play more than the 12 plays. Who gives a shit that our starters have barely played yet? We’ve got ten games left... 3 of which are warmups for the other 7 that matter. This is a perfect scenario for this team to be successful later in the season.
Fuck all this “we are what we are” negativity. It reeks of whalepants bitching because they don’t get to watch good or popular opponents. “But I want to tailgate and then watch ND”. Fuck that. I want this team succeed during ACC play and we are setup perfectly for it. 2-0, no injuries, ranked just outside the top 25 at worst and even possibly in it. Now 3 real winnable games before the herat of the schedule. You literally could not have drawn up a better start for the year.
They are lucky no one got seriously hurt. That's what's missing. Its cringeworthy every play.
I felt that way at the beginning of the game... the first two kickoffs definitely had that feel to it.
But after that, I actually thought Holy Cross did reasonably well (14 points on 194 yards) considering the serious disadvantages inherent in the match up.
I think it's too early to rule out playing them based on one game.
yurch10 {l Wrote}:Nobody cares. It was an easy game vs. an easy opponent, and our team didn't get injured.
People who rank teams don't care whether it's 50-0 against UMass, UConn, or Holy Cross. They don't know the difference.
So the only concern is that Holy Cross looked like they might get injured. Boohoo.
Our starters didn't play enough? ummm ok. If they can't beat Wake without two full four quarter games beforehand, our team sucks anyways.
Just a few fans looking for something to complain about. Shut up. It was an easy win against an overmatched team. Again, nobody cares.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:yurch10 {l Wrote}:Nobody cares. It was an easy game vs. an easy opponent, and our team didn't get injured.
People who rank teams don't care whether it's 50-0 against UMass, UConn, or Holy Cross. They don't know the difference.
So the only concern is that Holy Cross looked like they might get injured. Boohoo.
Our starters didn't play enough? ummm ok. If they can't beat Wake without two full four quarter games beforehand, our team sucks anyways.
Just a few fans looking for something to complain about. Shut up. It was an easy win against an overmatched team. Again, nobody cares.
Talk less.
hansen {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:yurch10 {l Wrote}:Nobody cares. It was an easy game vs. an easy opponent, and our team didn't get injured.
People who rank teams don't care whether it's 50-0 against UMass, UConn, or Holy Cross. They don't know the difference.
So the only concern is that Holy Cross looked like they might get injured. Boohoo.
Our starters didn't play enough? ummm ok. If they can't beat Wake without two full four quarter games beforehand, our team sucks anyways.
Just a few fans looking for something to complain about. Shut up. It was an easy win against an overmatched team. Again, nobody cares.
Talk less.
You’re opinion on this topic is in the minority here.
If anyone should have a problem with this game based on your concern it should be HC fans. And they seem to be fine with it.
Uptown Eagle {l Wrote}:The game was atrocious. I was in Boston for other business on Friday and dragged a friend to the game. It's a 5 hour drive for me one way to Boston and I still had zero interest in staying by the 2nd quarter. The crowd on campus before the game was lively, but the BC tailgating experience should not depend on the opponent's fans. It should be BC fans who make the experience fun. That it took HC fans to bring life to campus is an indictment on us.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:yurch10 {l Wrote}:Nobody cares. It was an easy game vs. an easy opponent, and our team didn't get injured.
People who rank teams don't care whether it's 50-0 against UMass, UConn, or Holy Cross. They don't know the difference.
So the only concern is that Holy Cross looked like they might get injured. Boohoo.
Our starters didn't play enough? ummm ok. If they can't beat Wake without two full four quarter games beforehand, our team sucks anyways.
Just a few fans looking for something to complain about. Shut up. It was an easy win against an overmatched team. Again, nobody cares.
Talk less.
You’re opinion on this topic is in the minority here.
If anyone should have a problem with this game based on your concern it should be HC fans. And they seem to be fine with it.
Yeah, and BC will move up in the polls. Dumb fucks.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Uptown Eagle {l Wrote}:The game was atrocious. I was in Boston for other business on Friday and dragged a friend to the game. It's a 5 hour drive for me one way to Boston and I still had zero interest in staying by the 2nd quarter. The crowd on campus before the game was lively, but the BC tailgating experience should not depend on the opponent's fans. It should be BC fans who make the experience fun. That it took HC fans to bring life to campus is an indictment on us.
This. Guess I'm not in the minority about losing ground playing high school teams. Sad, BC used to be better.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Uptown Eagle {l Wrote}:The game was atrocious. I was in Boston for other business on Friday and dragged a friend to the game. It's a 5 hour drive for me one way to Boston and I still had zero interest in staying by the 2nd quarter. The crowd on campus before the game was lively, but the BC tailgating experience should not depend on the opponent's fans. It should be BC fans who make the experience fun. That it took HC fans to bring life to campus is an indictment on us.
This. Guess I'm not in the minority about losing ground playing high school teams. Sad, BC used to be better.
I’m also in this camp and will ban* anyone that disagrees.
*i will not really ban you, but seriously... think about your life choices
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests