Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:The point is simple, if BC wants a very good football program then they have to pay the market rate for a coach.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:There's no way you graduated from business school anywhere.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Most of the revenues actually come in a check from the socialist bowl/TV revenue sharing agreement for the ACC. Which is precisely why there is no incentive to hire a good coach because they don't think it matters. Alumni could be completely empty and they would still bring in more gross revenue than they did in 2004.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:If you don't believe a winning coach can increase revenue significantly then there is zero reason to fire Daz. Your business strategy ensures that BC will continue to be a doormat in the ACC.
yes, we need a new coach, but your financial "analysis" is the most retarded thing ever posted here. and that includes nospace posts
keep Heinz or fire Heinz and this program is still losing out on coaching salaries for the next 3 years. that's not the reason you fire him, it's not a slam dunk, it's not a certainty. A new hire is just as much risk as the current asshole. To ignore that is American-Eastian thinking
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:I really like this new hjs. Not as much as foot likes dick, but he's a good addition to the 8 other posters here
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:If you don't believe a winning coach can increase revenue significantly then there is zero reason to fire Daz. Your business strategy ensures that BC will continue to be a doormat in the ACC.
yes, we need a new coach, but your financial "analysis" is the most retarded thing ever posted here. and that includes nospace posts
keep Heinz or fire Heinz and this program is still losing out on coaching salaries for the next 3 years. that's not the reason you fire him, it's not a slam dunk, it's not a certainty. A new hire is just as much risk as the current asshole. To ignore that is American-Eastian thinking
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:HJS & TRE sound like CEO's that can't make a decision. You have to be a complete idiot to bring Daz back for another season. His salary at this point is meaningless. If you don't think BC can increase revenues and it's best to stick with Daz, then stop your bitching about him and accept the fact that BC belongs in the basement of the ACC until they are willing to pay for a top quality coach. Middle of the pack salary obviously does not cut it for BC.
What's your plan to make BC football great again???
hansen {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:If you don't believe a winning coach can increase revenue significantly then there is zero reason to fire Daz. Your business strategy ensures that BC will continue to be a doormat in the ACC.
yes, we need a new coach, but your financial "analysis" is the most retarded thing ever posted here. and that includes nospace posts
keep Heinz or fire Heinz and this program is still losing out on coaching salaries for the next 3 years. that's not the reason you fire him, it's not a slam dunk, it's not a certainty. A new hire is just as much risk as the current asshole. To ignore that is American-Eastian thinking
Dazaster is not a good coach.
BC sucks at hiring good coaches.
Thus, until regime change occurs, I prefer sticking with the devil I know rather than the devil I don't as it definitely could get worse than him.
* as long as the team is still willing to playing for him.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:If you don't believe a winning coach can increase revenue significantly then there is zero reason to fire Daz. Your business strategy ensures that BC will continue to be a doormat in the ACC.
yes, we need a new coach, but your financial "analysis" is the most retarded thing ever posted here. and that includes nospace posts
keep Heinz or fire Heinz and this program is still losing out on coaching salaries for the next 3 years. that's not the reason you fire him, it's not a slam dunk, it's not a certainty. A new hire is just as much risk as the current asshole. To ignore that is American-Eastian thinking
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:If you don't believe a winning coach can increase revenue significantly then there is zero reason to fire Daz. Your business strategy ensures that BC will continue to be a doormat in the ACC.
yes, we need a new coach, but your financial "analysis" is the most retarded thing ever posted here. and that includes nospace posts
keep Heinz or fire Heinz and this program is still losing out on coaching salaries for the next 3 years. that's not the reason you fire him, it's not a slam dunk, it's not a certainty. A new hire is just as much risk as the current asshole. To ignore that is American-Eastian thinking
Dazaster is not a good coach.
BC sucks at hiring good coaches.
Thus, until regime change occurs, I prefer sticking with the devil I know rather than the devil I don't as it definitely could get worse than him.
* as long as the team is still willing to playing for him.
You were doing so well for a while. There is 0 reason to bring Daz back, and they’re not going to once he goes 3-9. Any suggestion that this team is making a bowl is absolutely crazy.
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:TRE: This is no time to be afraid of making a change. A good CEO has confidence in their abilities to find a good coach that will increase revenues to offset the cost to get rid of Daz. Stop being such a pussy, man up and run the fucking business!
MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:If Eaglekeeper is going to be incessant about this PSU guy (Eaglekeeper is obsessed with PSU) then I am going to start posting non-stop about Brian Daboll.
Box Score against Vandy...
HJS {l Wrote}:MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:If Eaglekeeper is going to be incessant about this PSU guy (Eaglekeeper is obsessed with PSU) then I am going to start posting non-stop about Brian Daboll.
Box Score against Vandy...
I like that he is young. But he's more a Mangini product than a Beliceck one. Further, I don't think Bama vs. Vandy is something that displays his talents (as that game is what Clemson would've done to us if we "opened-it-up" from the kickoff). I'd argue that, his years as an NFL OC would be more illustrative. "Under Daboll, the Browns ranked last out of the NFL's 32 teams in total offense in 2009 and then 29th in 2010. The Miami Dolphins were 22nd in total offense under Daboll in 2011 and Daboll's 2012 Kansas City Chiefs offense ranked 24th." Now, just like Bama scrimmages... these NFL stats are misleading as his QBs were the likes of Brady Quinn, Derek Anderson and Jake Delhomme.
Known as the "Heinz Hammer", Addazio is well known for devouring large quantities of french fries and ketchup on his Monday night radio appearances.
HJS {l Wrote}:So... when I was looking to see how much money we gave Temple for the privilege of hiring Daz away from Philly, I came across his Wiki page. Good work boys.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_AddazioKnown as the "Heinz Hammer", Addazio is well known for devouring large quantities of french fries and ketchup on his Monday night radio appearances.
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:Why not just give Daz a 3 year extension with a substantial cut in salary?
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:If he keeps eating like that, he might be gone sooner rather than later!
I expect some donor or a group of donors will buy out his contract. You have think if people are excited about donating to the IPF they will be really excited to get rid of this foul mouthed boob of a coach.
EagleDave {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:If he keeps eating like that, he might be gone sooner rather than later!
I expect some donor or a group of donors will buy out his contract. You have think if people are excited about donating to the IPF they will be really excited to get rid of this foul mouthed boob of a coach.
Donors don't get their names on Addazio's pink slip the way they do the IPF. Nobody is ponying up to get rid of him.
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:I'm joking about giving him an extension. If a donor comes up with 5 million they will have their name put up somewhere.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 141 guests