flyingelvii wrote:One of which took place when 40% of the modern-day league would be ineligible to play.
ped?
flyingelvii wrote:One of which took place when 40% of the modern-day league would be ineligible to play.
flyingelvii wrote:Not white
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:flyingelvii wrote:One of which took place when 40% of the modern-day league would be ineligible to play.
ped?
jhiggi02 wrote:BCEagles25 wrote:jhiggi02 wrote:HJS wrote:BCEagles25 wrote:Reverend Mike wrote:BCEagles25 wrote:If Vontaze Burfict has never been thrown out of a game, nobody else should either. Dupree should probably be fined, but no ejection was the right call. On the other hand, Antonio Brown and Le'Veon Bell probably should be suspended for what they did to the Dolphins
I agree that's the right call given what the rules are. I'm saying the rule should be changed. He went high and led with the crown of the helmet.
I thought Bud should have went lower. I agree that the NFL needs to straighten out what they consider "hitting a runner" vs a personal foul, before it costs someone a Superbowl. They may also want to figure out what a catch is
I agree with all you guys. Absolutely no reason he had to hit him in the facemask when the flags are attached to his waist.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.yahoo. ... ent=safari
"Moore was rolling to his right, when linebacker Bud Dupree lowered his head and hit Moore in the helmet with the crown of his helmet. It was a easy for officials to throw a 15-yard penalty flag on Dupree."
Using quotes from a Yahoo sports article to support your opinion? What is this a high school English class? I would also appreciate it if you could at least cite it in MLA format
You must have went to a 'fine' institution of 'higher learning' if you could get through high school citing yahoo.
DomingoOrtiz wrote:TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:flyingelvii wrote:One of which took place when 40% of the modern-day league would be ineligible to play.
ped?
hansen wrote:twballgame9 wrote:hansen wrote:twballgame9 wrote:People that think this Giants team was the only team that could beat the Pats were a special level of retarded. The Giants suck and there is a team or two that could beat the pat's on a good day. It is just not the Giants. Steelers and Packers
Didn't the patriots have a weak schedule this year due to luck and injury?
I dont follow the NFL very closesly but I vaguely remember reading that somewhere.
Something about very few teams they beat had winning records.
They beat the Texans 27 to 0 with jacoby brissett at QB. Think on that BC fan. Like the Cardinals beating the sox
Cardinals-Red Sox are 2-2 in World Series.
twballgame9 wrote:hansen wrote:twballgame9 wrote:hansen wrote:twballgame9 wrote:People that think this Giants team was the only team that could beat the Pats were a special level of retarded. The Giants suck and there is a team or two that could beat the pat's on a good day. It is just not the Giants. Steelers and Packers
Didn't the patriots have a weak schedule this year due to luck and injury?
I dont follow the NFL very closesly but I vaguely remember reading that somewhere.
Something about very few teams they beat had winning records.
They beat the Texans 27 to 0 with jacoby brissett at QB. Think on that BC fan. Like the Cardinals beating the sox
Cardinals-Red Sox are 2-2 in World Series.
Not in my lifetime, Rogers Hornsby.
gallopingghost wrote:twballgame9 wrote:People that think this Giants team was the only team that could beat the Pats were a special level of retarded. The Giants suck and there is a team or two that could beat the pat's on a good day. It is just not the Giants. Steelers and Packers
But at least Eli preserved his undefeated record in the Superbowl which is the basis of his greatness. If he had won three playoff games and then lost in the Superbowl it would mean that he sucks. This way he retains his great quarterback status vs Brady because he beat him twice head to head.
angrychicken wrote:IB talking about someone else's meaningless rhetoric is humorous.
TontoKowalski wrote:Question - can you take a Weight Watchers shake in suppository form?
angrychicken wrote:TontoKowalski wrote:Question - can you take a Weight Watchers shake in suppository form?
According to TRE, you can take ANYTHING in suppository form.
angrychicken wrote:TontoKowalski wrote:Question - can you take a Weight Watchers shake in suppository form?
According to TRE, you can take ANYTHING in suppository form.
angrychicken wrote:TontoKowalski wrote:Question - can you take a Weight Watchers shake in suppository form?
According to TRE, you can take ANYTHING in suppository form.
gallopingghost wrote:twballgame9 wrote:People that think this Giants team was the only team that could beat the Pats were a special level of retarded. The Giants suck and there is a team or two that could beat the pat's on a good day. It is just not the Giants. Steelers and Packers
But at least Eli preserved his undefeated record in the Superbowl which is the basis of his greatness. If he had won three playoff games and then lost in the Superbowl it would mean that he sucks. This way he retains his great quarterback status vs Brady because he beat him twice head to head.
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:angrychicken wrote:TontoKowalski wrote:Question - can you take a Weight Watchers shake in suppository form?
According to TRE, you can take ANYTHING in suppository form.
i think you confused me with the other maroon name again
Dick Rosenthal wrote:
... from which to shell betardo into silence.
Onyx Blackman wrote:KPL helping out Matty Ice, though it seemed like a bullshit call.
Users browsing this forum: MaxxPower325 and 9 guests