Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

by **BCSUPERFAN22** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:48 pm

http://www.bceagles.com/news/2016/6/13/eagles-add-stanford-to-list-of-future-football-opponents.aspx

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:03 pm

the stanford rapist should be our of jail by then

by **JesuitIvy** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:13 pm

People who know football know that between youth and injuries, 2028 will be tough goin'

by **DavidGordonsFoot** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:14 pm

Hooray?

by **mod6A** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:54 pm

this will be a conference game, correct?

:whalepants

by **DomingoOrtiz** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 5:19 pm

Yawn

by **commavegarage** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 5:27 pm

which games happen first:

1: Tosu
b: stanford
iii: none of the above

by **eagle33** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:17 pm

Hopefully the IPF will have moved past renderings to architectural drawings by then.

by **eepstein0** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:50 pm

That's a good series, it's just really far from now

by **dtwalrus** on Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:34 pm

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:That's a good series, it's just really far from now

Seriously. I was very excited because, you know, Stanford. But then I did the math and realized how old I'll be when/if this series actually happens.

:bag

by **angrychicken** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 6:00 am

dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:That's a good series, it's just really far from now

Seriously. I was very excited because, you know, Stanford. But then I did the math and realized how old I'll be when/if this series actually happens.

Kids that are six years old right now will be playing in these games.

by **dtwalrus** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 6:25 am

angrychicken {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:That's a good series, it's just really far from now

Seriously. I was very excited because, you know, Stanford. But then I did the math and realized how old I'll be when/if this series actually happens.

Kids that are six years old right now will be playing in these games.

In fairness, aside from a single opening 6 years from now, we had no P5 openings until 2026 anyway.

P5 scheduling had gone from terrible to actually pretty good. Notre Dame, Ohio State, Purdue and Stanford. The only openings between now and 2030 are 2021, 2026 and 2027. Hopefully Bates can manage another decent home and home. Throw in Penn State to that mix, for instance, and I think we'd all be pretty satisfied overall.

Edit: just realized the ACC only announced the ND games through 2025. So there's a chance we could get them again in 2026 or 2027. Which means we are exactly one more home and home away from a very solid future P5 schedule.

by **claver2010** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:17 am

dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
angrychicken {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:That's a good series, it's just really far from now

Seriously. I was very excited because, you know, Stanford. But then I did the math and realized how old I'll be when/if this series actually happens.

Kids that are six years old right now will be playing in these games.

In fairness, aside from a single opening 6 years from now, we had no P5 openings until 2026 anyway.

P5 scheduling had gone from terrible to actually pretty good. Notre Dame, Ohio State, Purdue and Stanford. The only openings between now and 2030 are 2021, 2026 and 2027. Hopefully Bates can manage another decent home and home. Throw in Penn State to that mix, for instance, and I think we'd all be pretty satisfied overall.

Edit: just realized the ACC only announced the ND games through 2025. So there's a chance we could get them again in 2026 or 2027. Which means we are exactly one more home and home away from a very solid future P5 schedule.

wait, is there some requirement that only allows 1 p5 game per year that I'm unaware of?

the h/h is excellent

o/u 3.5 bc fb head coaches between now and then (counting daz as 1)

by **eepstein0** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:32 am

claver2010 {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
angrychicken {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:That's a good series, it's just really far from now

Seriously. I was very excited because, you know, Stanford. But then I did the math and realized how old I'll be when/if this series actually happens.

Kids that are six years old right now will be playing in these games.

In fairness, aside from a single opening 6 years from now, we had no P5 openings until 2026 anyway.

P5 scheduling had gone from terrible to actually pretty good. Notre Dame, Ohio State, Purdue and Stanford. The only openings between now and 2030 are 2021, 2026 and 2027. Hopefully Bates can manage another decent home and home. Throw in Penn State to that mix, for instance, and I think we'd all be pretty satisfied overall.

Edit: just realized the ACC only announced the ND games through 2025. So there's a chance we could get them again in 2026 or 2027. Which means we are exactly one more home and home away from a very solid future P5 schedule.

wait, is there some requirement that only allows 1 p5 game per year that I'm unaware of?

the h/h is excellent

o/u 3.5 bc fb head coaches between now and then (counting daz as 1)

The first sentence of this is fantastic.

Purdue barely counts.

by **dtwalrus** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:57 am

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
angrychicken {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:That's a good series, it's just really far from now

Seriously. I was very excited because, you know, Stanford. But then I did the math and realized how old I'll be when/if this series actually happens.

Kids that are six years old right now will be playing in these games.

In fairness, aside from a single opening 6 years from now, we had no P5 openings until 2026 anyway.

P5 scheduling had gone from terrible to actually pretty good. Notre Dame, Ohio State, Purdue and Stanford. The only openings between now and 2030 are 2021, 2026 and 2027. Hopefully Bates can manage another decent home and home. Throw in Penn State to that mix, for instance, and I think we'd all be pretty satisfied overall.

Edit: just realized the ACC only announced the ND games through 2025. So there's a chance we could get them again in 2026 or 2027. Which means we are exactly one more home and home away from a very solid future P5 schedule.

wait, is there some requirement that only allows 1 p5 game per year that I'm unaware of?

the h/h is excellent

o/u 3.5 bc fb head coaches between now and then (counting daz as 1)

The first sentence of this is fantastic.

Purdue barely counts.

1) With Bates and Daz at the helm, there's definitely a one-P5-per-year limit.

b) Purdue fills a void when there weren't many options remaining and they're a reasonable opponent for a rebuilding program (still rebuilding in Daz year 7 of course). Could be worse. Could be Maryland or Rutgers.

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:58 am

claver2010 {l Wrote}:
wait, is there some requirement that only allows 1 p5 game per year that I'm unaware of?

unlike hansen, the howards of the world are not going to beat themselves

by **DavidGordonsFoot** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:02 am

commavegarage {l Wrote}:which games happen first:

1: Tosu
b: stanford
iii: none of the above

iii

by **DrJackRyan** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:01 am

This was scheduled so future Athletic Director Tom Brady could have one game near his home town.

by **hinghameagle** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:07 am

I thought Stanford had a policy of not traveling to play road games against teams in the Patriot League?

by **eepstein0** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:52 am

dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
angrychicken {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:That's a good series, it's just really far from now

Seriously. I was very excited because, you know, Stanford. But then I did the math and realized how old I'll be when/if this series actually happens.

Kids that are six years old right now will be playing in these games.

In fairness, aside from a single opening 6 years from now, we had no P5 openings until 2026 anyway.

P5 scheduling had gone from terrible to actually pretty good. Notre Dame, Ohio State, Purdue and Stanford. The only openings between now and 2030 are 2021, 2026 and 2027. Hopefully Bates can manage another decent home and home. Throw in Penn State to that mix, for instance, and I think we'd all be pretty satisfied overall.

Edit: just realized the ACC only announced the ND games through 2025. So there's a chance we could get them again in 2026 or 2027. Which means we are exactly one more home and home away from a very solid future P5 schedule.

wait, is there some requirement that only allows 1 p5 game per year that I'm unaware of?

the h/h is excellent

o/u 3.5 bc fb head coaches between now and then (counting daz as 1)

The first sentence of this is fantastic.

Purdue barely counts.

1) With Bates and Daz at the helm, there's definitely a one-P5-per-year limit.

b) Purdue fills a void when there weren't many options remaining and they're a reasonable opponent for a rebuilding program (still rebuilding in Daz year 7 of course). Could be worse. Could be Maryland or Rutgers.

Nothing says Ever to be Mediocre like Boston College Athletics

by **eagletx** on Tue Jun 14, 2016 6:25 pm

Wow! Who would have guessed that we would have played Stanford before we broke ground on the new football practice facility!

by **EagleDave** on Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:38 pm

Given what we know about the Daz/Bates scheduling theory of 6-6 at all costs, I'm expecting a cancellation of this series in the near future accompanied by a statement from Bates saying that he thought he was scheduling Samford.

by **Bryn Mawr Eagle** on Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:29 am

angrychicken {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:That's a good series, it's just really far from now

Seriously. I was very excited because, you know, Stanford. But then I did the math and realized how old I'll be when/if this series actually happens.

Kids that are six years old right now will be playing in these games.

And I'll be 58 and 59 when those games are played. Yikes.

by **DavidGordonsFoot** on Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:17 am

Bryn Mawr Eagle {l Wrote}:
angrychicken {l Wrote}:
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:That's a good series, it's just really far from now

Seriously. I was very excited because, you know, Stanford. But then I did the math and realized how old I'll be when/if this series actually happens.

Kids that are six years old right now will be playing in these games.

And I'll be 58 and 59 when those games are played. Yikes.

Leave it to BC football to make us stop and recognize our own mortality. So much for sports as diversion.

Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Re: Stanford on schedule 2028-2029

Who is online