twballgame9 {l Wrote}:There is nothing wrong with DBS. Win football games.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:There is nothing wrong with DBS. Win football games.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:There is nothing wrong with DBS. Win football games.
There's nothing wrong with having DBS. I have a problem with the way Gene rolled it out. He should have grandfathered in the people who had those seats.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:There is nothing wrong with DBS. Win football games.
There's nothing wrong with having DBS. I have a problem with the way Gene rolled it out. He should have grandfathered in the people who had those seats.
Most of those people suck anyway. They come to the games at least, which is great, but they are terrible football fans. If DBS cleared out whalepants, good. They just failed to figure out how to replace them.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:I just saw an online commercial for Oregon football and their new Marcus Mariota Workout Center or whatever it's called has a giant duck-themed throne in the middle of it. Does this shit really matter to recruits?
The ad included a poorly edited clip from Game of Thrones that made it look like Cersei was addressing the Oregon mascot. It's cringe-worthy.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:I just saw an online commercial for Oregon football and their new Marcus Mariota Workout Center or whatever it's called has a giant duck-themed throne in the middle of it. Does this shit really matter to recruits?
The ad included a poorly edited clip from Game of Thrones that made it look like Cersei was addressing the Oregon mascot. It's cringe-worthy.
BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:I just saw an online commercial for Oregon football and their new Marcus Mariota Workout Center or whatever it's called has a giant duck-themed throne in the middle of it. Does this shit really matter to recruits?
The ad included a poorly edited clip from Game of Thrones that made it look like Cersei was addressing the Oregon mascot. It's cringe-worthy.
https://twitter.com/OregonFBequip/status/773917139757518848
The answer is yea, maybe not the duck throne (although something like that is so small in relation to everything else at Oregon), but this building is full of shit that grabs the attention of 18 year old black kids and their parents
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:I just saw an online commercial for Oregon football and their new Marcus Mariota Workout Center or whatever it's called has a giant duck-themed throne in the middle of it. Does this shit really matter to recruits?
The ad included a poorly edited clip from Game of Thrones that made it look like Cersei was addressing the Oregon mascot. It's cringe-worthy.
https://twitter.com/OregonFBequip/status/773917139757518848
The answer is yea, maybe not the duck throne (although something like that is so small in relation to everything else at Oregon), but this building is full of shit that grabs the attention of 18 year old black kids and their parents
BC Athletics could have the BRA's blessing to build whatever & wherever they want along with a blank check and they would never build something as ostentatious as that facility. As an alumni, I would be opposed to something that garish. Maybe that's part of the problem?
BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}: Oregon builds that because it fits with the overall facility footprint, that's just their thing. Perhaps aesthetically what Oregon does is a bit much, but functionally, its the kind of crap that kids want to see (uniforms, apparel, etc ...).
BC doesn't have to build something that is aesthetically similar to Oregon, but if/when any type of facility improvements occur, they need to have a careful plan that what they are building has at least a similar functionality to other schools (i.e. Oregon) and will never be outgrown (upgrading with graphics and doing different things aesthetically to the interior of the building is obv much easier than having to build/add-on). These buildings cant be built with the blessing or wishes of alumni, they have to be focused towards the appetite of high school kids.
The bottom line is, whatever Oregon is doing, works. That is a state with equally bad high school football talent to Massachusetts and they have proven to be at least relevant for a long time while also seeing the highs of a BCSNCG.
eagle33 {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}: Oregon builds that because it fits with the overall facility footprint, that's just their thing. Perhaps aesthetically what Oregon does is a bit much, but functionally, its the kind of crap that kids want to see (uniforms, apparel, etc ...).
BC doesn't have to build something that is aesthetically similar to Oregon, but if/when any type of facility improvements occur, they need to have a careful plan that what they are building has at least a similar functionality to other schools (i.e. Oregon) and will never be outgrown (upgrading with graphics and doing different things aesthetically to the interior of the building is obv much easier than having to build/add-on). These buildings cant be built with the blessing or wishes of alumni, they have to be focused towards the appetite of high school kids.
The bottom line is, whatever Oregon is doing, works. That is a state with equally bad high school football talent to Massachusetts and they have proven to be at least relevant for a long time while also seeing the highs of a BCSNCG.
I agree Oregon get the recruits they get because kids like that shit. But Oregon builds that because of Phil Knight. If it wasn't for him bankrolling their athletic department and facilities upgrades Oregon would most likely be on a par with Oregon State.
BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:eagle33 {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}: Oregon builds that because it fits with the overall facility footprint, that's just their thing. Perhaps aesthetically what Oregon does is a bit much, but functionally, its the kind of crap that kids want to see (uniforms, apparel, etc ...).
BC doesn't have to build something that is aesthetically similar to Oregon, but if/when any type of facility improvements occur, they need to have a careful plan that what they are building has at least a similar functionality to other schools (i.e. Oregon) and will never be outgrown (upgrading with graphics and doing different things aesthetically to the interior of the building is obv much easier than having to build/add-on). These buildings cant be built with the blessing or wishes of alumni, they have to be focused towards the appetite of high school kids.
The bottom line is, whatever Oregon is doing, works. That is a state with equally bad high school football talent to Massachusetts and they have proven to be at least relevant for a long time while also seeing the highs of a BCSNCG.
I agree Oregon get the recruits they get because kids like that shit. But Oregon builds that because of Phil Knight. If it wasn't for him bankrolling their athletic department and facilities upgrades Oregon would most likely be on a par with Oregon State.
OK, and ... ? BC and Oregon are in similar geographic areas in terms of local high school talent, its not good and both need to expand its recruiting base by going into more fertile areas with more competition. Regardless of how it happens, one has top end facilities and one doesn't, guess which has been a consistent winner the last 15 years.
With that being said, BC doesn't need Oregon type facilities or a Phil Knight type to back them. They need a few important things to bring them out of 1980's that are all very basic (IPF, Locker Rooms, Weight Room, maybe some type of recruiting area). Oregon aside, when you look at places like Syracuse, Northwestern and Wake Forest and see that their facilities are 100x better than anything BC is rolling out, you know there is a problem.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:um, phil knight pays for all that shit. that's the "okay, and..."
we don't have a phil knight and our local athletic apparel company probably charges the school for using their lot for satellite parking on game days.
maybe if eepstein would sweet talk his fellow middlebury alum, we could get the good shit on campus paid for
BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:Looks like Vandy (of all places) is planning to pass BC in facilities now as well.
http://www.anchorofgold.com/2016/9/16/12943488/2016-ncaa-football-tennessean-vanderbilt-stadium-replacement
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:DBS killed attendance. The Red Sox do not have DBS and they love their season ticket holders. All BC had to do was increase the price of the game tickets. Asking for 4-8k more than the season before when you have zero donors lined up to replace your current season ticket holders is as fucking stupid as stupid gets.
ESPN Classic had 2002 BC vs VT game replay today. They showed off the new plans for the all sports facility. It included a scaled model that closed in the corners with buildings including adding on to the back of Conte Forum. All we ended up getting was the scaled down Yawkey Center.
In addition, Bates stated that the University will begin discussions with Boston city officials regarding construction of an athletics field house that would be located adjacent to Alumni Stadium. This indoor facility, to be funded through private gifts, would provide much-needed space for varsity football and other field sports, as well as campus recreation, club sports, and intramurals.
EagleDave {l Wrote}:My favorite part of the Miami announcement is that it's going to take 18 months to build, so it'll be open in 2018.
What was BC's timetable? 2025?
What a smokescreen that whole thing was after that BC hoops debacle at Wake Forest.
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:It's all nonsense regarding fundraising. There has been no announcement of any capital campaign to raise the funds to build the IPF. Every FF donor should or would have been asked to donate any amount of money to help the cause, but nothing has been announced. Why would anyone limit the pool of donors to go after or pass up the opportunity to get a media splash by holding a kickoff event.
BC should borrow the money to build the IPF and hang onto their cash donations. If Leahy really wanted the annual deficit to be erased he would set up a separate endowment for athletics with a ten year capital campaign where the university would not charge the athletic department 18 million per year. That alone equals 180 million after 10 years along with another 250 million from the ACC. Even a 5% annual return on 500 million would cover the scholarship cost and permanently eliminate the annual operating losses once and forever.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:It's all nonsense regarding fundraising. There has been no announcement of any capital campaign to raise the funds to build the IPF. Every FF donor should or would have been asked to donate any amount of money to help the cause, but nothing has been announced. Why would anyone limit the pool of donors to go after or pass up the opportunity to get a media splash by holding a kickoff event.
BC should borrow the money to build the IPF and hang onto their cash donations. If Leahy really wanted the annual deficit to be erased he would set up a separate endowment for athletics with a ten year capital campaign where the university would not charge the athletic department 18 million per year. That alone equals 180 million after 10 years along with another 250 million from the ACC. Even a 5% annual return on 500 million would cover the scholarship cost and permanently eliminate the annual operating losses once and forever.
Jesus stop and go eat at Flemmings.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests