Should I read the game thread?

by **DavidGordonsFoot** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:21 am

I IB'd the game Saturday and still haven't watched it. In fact, I have been advised not to watch it and will probably take that advice.

I'm assuming the game thread is an absolute shitshow given what I was able to glean from the boxscore and the various agendas around here. Should I bother reading it?

by **eagle9903** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:24 am

It's ~68% eepstein with 300 different iterations of "X is awful/terrible/miserable/horrendous".

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:24 am

the best thing that you could take away from the gamethread are the number of people finally realizing that sgt slaughter may not be the greatest coach that bc's ever had ever. a whole lot of bandwagon seats are now available on the notorious orange express.

outside of that, it's a whole bunch of "throws great" vs. "less mobile" and "why are they still playing rouse" and "how do we still not have a kicker that can actually kick"

i think the majority of the comments in the thread have been made after the game ended.

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:26 am

oh yeah, and moj made a couple of reaffirmations about how he loves don brown and always has. you know, using that moniker that he gave him 3 years ago "3 and out donnie brown"

by **eagle9903** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:32 am

It's heart wrenching tale of overcoming the odds and beating seemingly insurmountable oppression, as TRE supported by only 25 or so of the 27 posters in the thread, is finally able to voice his opinion.

by **b0mberMan** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:32 am

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:the best thing that you could take away from the gamethread are the number of people finally realizing that sgt slaughter may not be the greatest coach that bc's ever had ever. a whole lot of bandwagon seats are now available on the notorious orange express.

You know, though. While I don't agree with Orange, after my experience on that crazy train we called the Arlington Express with the hoops team a few years ago, I don't want to discourage him from continuing the journey.

Keep shining on you special snowflake!

by **eagle9903** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:33 am

I drank a bit and made about 15 posts about eepsteins micropenis, it was widely ignored.

Now that it's monday morning, I still believe that eepstein has micropenis FWIW.

by **DavidGordonsFoot** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:33 am

Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:42 am

DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

by **twballgame9** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:47 am

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

God I hope he has time to develop something better than that.

Skip the thread. It's a bigger dumpster fire than BC's offense.

by **eagle9903** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:53 am

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

God I hope he has time to develop something better than that.

Skip the thread. It's a bigger dumpster fire than BC's offense.

Listen, I certainly don't want to disregard commentary from the guy who brought us Aspazziano! Pizza Pie! but when you're dealing with a volume poster like eepstein nuance doesn't work. It has to be micropenis.

by **DavidGordonsFoot** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:54 am

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

God I hope he has time to develop something better than that.

Skip the thread. It's a bigger dumpster fire than BC's offense.

Listen, I certainly don't want to disregard commentary from the guy who brought us Aspazziano! Pizza Pie! but when you're dealing with a volume poster like eepstein nuance doesn't work. It has to be micropenis.

I can respect that.

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:00 am

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

God I hope he has time to develop something better than that.

Skip the thread. It's a bigger dumpster fire than BC's offense.

Listen, I certainly don't want to disregard commentary from the guy who brought us Aspazziano! Pizza Pie! but when you're dealing with a volume poster like eepstein nuance doesn't work. It has to be micropenis.

by **eagle9903** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:02 am

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

Above you will see TRE, abetted only by the meager support of Hansen, Commavegarage, claver, eepstein, duchesneeast,teddy, rocketbreaker, duxeagle26, mod6a, Ilikebc, domingoortiz, strateagle, durkcal, dick ritchie, eaglenyc, 2014 eagle, iggle, supahfan99, eaglefan06, murt, 31southst, bcsuperfan22, quailman, tallsy, atleagle, bunratty, manny, lawyersgunsnmoney, regalbceagle, eagle33, maxxpower325, footer20, hjs, et al., emerge triumphant against the lockstep hordes of conformity IE militanteagle and dtwalrus.

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:05 am

for those that want to see bunsen's hilarity on their computer screen...

by **eagle9903** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:07 am

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:for those that want to see bunsen's hilarity on their computer screen...

your are not just brave, but generous also

by **twballgame9** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:31 am

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

God I hope he has time to develop something better than that.

Skip the thread. It's a bigger dumpster fire than BC's offense.

Listen, I certainly don't want to disregard commentary from the guy who brought us Aspazziano! Pizza Pie! but when you're dealing with a volume poster like eepstein nuance doesn't work. It has to be micropenis.

Okay.

by **eagle9903** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 1:51 pm

tomando {l Wrote}:
I kissed a light socket once and I woke up in a helicopter!

So what if the other moderators laugh at you behind your back? Keep on editing other people's posts because it allows you to be someone!

No original thoughts, no prospects for attaining anything in life? That's OK, assume other's identities!

It's a job for losers, but someone's gotta do it! Come out of the closet, Caitlyn!

This one confuses me. Is this tomando or edited tomando?

by **b0mberMan** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 1:53 pm

That means the gag is working

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 1:59 pm

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:That means the gag is working

it sure does, susie... it sure does

by **eepstein0** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:00 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

God I hope he has time to develop something better than that.

Skip the thread. It's a bigger dumpster fire than BC's offense.

This

by **b0mberMan** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:00 pm

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

God I hope he has time to develop something better than that.

Skip the thread. It's a bigger dumpster fire than BC's offense.

This

Also evidence of a gag working

by **twballgame9** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:02 pm

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Is there anything to the eepstein micropenis gag other than the obvious?

not really. bunsen quoted eepstein posts from 5 or 6 different threads with the only real substance asserting the fact that eepstein has a micropenis.

i have a feeling it will be a recurring gag the next time bc plays less well than the high-expectation-set here believes that they should

God I hope he has time to develop something better than that.

Skip the thread. It's a bigger dumpster fire than BC's offense.

This

Also evidence of a gag working

epstein is PhillyIntern? Man I can't keep up with anything these days

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:09 pm

tomando {l Wrote}:
Also evidence of a gag working

I like men now!

believe it or not, this is actually more widely accepted at bc interruption. maybe you should take your talents there for some support of your ideas and thoughts on the world of bc football and beyond

by **b0mberMan** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:11 pm

Didn't you read tubasteak's posts when tomato first showed up here? He was kicked out of BCI for making unwanted advances during a meet up at a women's fencing match.

by **Corporal Funishment** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:12 pm

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
tomando {l Wrote}:
Also evidence of a gag working

I like men now!

believe it or not, this is actually more widely accepted at bc interruption. maybe you should take your talents there for some support of your ideas and thoughts on the world of bc football and beyond

If the guy wants to talk BC football, let him post. I mean, jhiggi is a terrible poster and no one edits his posts...

by **twballgame9** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:14 pm

Who let the hoops weirdos out?

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:15 pm

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:Didn't you read tubasteak's posts when tomato first showed up here? He was kicked out of BCI for making unwanted advances during a meet up at a women's fencing match.

i typically don't read tubasteak's posts

by **b0mberMan** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:16 pm

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:Didn't you read tubasteak's posts when tomato first showed up here? He was kicked out of BCI for making unwanted advances during a meet up at a women's fencing match.

i typically don't read tubasteak's posts

Good. Jerk gets 1st chair and thinks he's chief blow hard

by **twballgame9** on Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:17 pm

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:Didn't you read tubasteak's posts when tomato first showed up here? He was kicked out of BCI for making unwanted advances during a meet up at a women's fencing match.

i typically don't read tubasteak's posts

Good. Jerk gets 1st chair and thinks he's chief blow hard

What's first chair? Is that something you band guys do?