2016 Recruiting Thread

Forum rules
"The opinions expressed on this board are property of the poster and do not reflect the opinion of EagleOutsider, Boston College or Boston College Athletics"

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby 2001Eagle on Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:12 am

I can't imagine that this is helping.

http://www.sportsdaynow.com/understandi ... olarships/
Coach hard. Love hard.
User avatar
2001Eagle
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:26 pm
Karma: 123

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby twballgame9 on Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:45 am

Those numbers will not stay the same, as the article admits. That's complete speculation based on numbers they had to blow dust off of.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34384
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby HJS on Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:52 am

I don't think it is at all surprising that the private schools (and the decent public schools) have very little to make up in "full cost of attendance". Crap schools fudging numbers to entice more kids with "full scholarships" that ultimately leaves kids 25% short of actual cost should shock no one. Similarly, the fact that it occurs most often at government-run State schools should equally not surprise. By going the "full cost of attendance" route, all the Big 5 did was athletically reward these diploma mills for the prior bad practices (and incentivizes more schools to find new ways of screwing their regular students).

BC's vote against is remarkable only in its loneliness.
"The Michelangelo of stupidity is again on top of his scaffolding, lying on his back and painting a masterpiece of imbecility on the ceiling of a virtual Sistine Chapel." © 2023 A AngryDick Joint
User avatar
HJS
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 16624
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:08 pm
Karma: 606

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby 2001Eagle on Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:53 am

I don't disagree with either of you, just saying that I'm sure this number and the lone dissenting vote is easy fodder to recruit against BC.
Coach hard. Love hard.
User avatar
2001Eagle
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:26 pm
Karma: 123

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby HJS on Tue Apr 28, 2015 10:29 am

2001Eagle {l Wrote}:I don't disagree with either of you, just saying that I'm sure this number and the lone dissenting vote is easy fodder to recruit against BC.

I don't think that any kid who is considering BC is going to not pick BC based upon $3k in cash that they aren't getting. Technically, that money is something that is "needed" just to attend the school. One way to blunt it to parents who care is by saying... this is like (instead of giving a scholarship) giving your kid the exact cash needed to attend school. How confident would you be that your kid adequately manages it? Similarly, how confident are you that the additional $3k is going to be there when your kid needs it at the end of the semester? Further, if you really need to talk dollars and cents, 5 years at BC is $250k worth of education... most schools provide value at half that rate... we are talking the difference between a Bugatti and a suped-up Civic.
"The Michelangelo of stupidity is again on top of his scaffolding, lying on his back and painting a masterpiece of imbecility on the ceiling of a virtual Sistine Chapel." © 2023 A AngryDick Joint
User avatar
HJS
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 16624
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:08 pm
Karma: 606

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby RegalBCeagle on Tue Apr 28, 2015 11:14 am

HJS {l Wrote}:
2001Eagle {l Wrote}:I don't disagree with either of you, just saying that I'm sure this number and the lone dissenting vote is easy fodder to recruit against BC.

I don't think that any kid who is considering BC is going to not pick BC based upon $3k in cash that they aren't getting. Technically, that money is something that is "needed" just to attend the school. One way to blunt it to parents who care is by saying... this is like (instead of giving a scholarship) giving your kid the exact cash needed to attend school. How confident would you be that your kid adequately manages it? Similarly, how confident are you that the additional $3k is going to be there when your kid needs it at the end of the semester? Further, if you really need to talk dollars and cents, 5 years at BC is $250k worth of education... most schools provide value at half that rate... we are talking the difference between a Bugatti and a suped-up Civic.


The important comparison is how BC's "payout" compares to those of the schools we compete against for kids. How do we compare with OSU, ND, Michigan, Penn State, Cuse, Pitt, Rutgers, UCONN, and so on. I'm not too worried about how we stack up against SEC schools - FSU and Clemson notwithstanding. Also, did Dalton drop BC for Bama because of this?
User avatar
RegalBCeagle
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2794
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:55 pm
Karma: 374

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby hinghameagle on Tue Apr 28, 2015 11:23 am

this is why I hated this legislature being passed. This is going to end up crooked beyond belief. At least in the pay for play system that the SEC currently operates under, you could at least just try to fool yourself that everything is on the up and up. But football staffers going to the school finance committees and telling them to raise the cost of attending, just so they can give potential recruits more money...and lets not fool ourselves, the schools will do it, really will do away with even the slightest pretension that anyone is concerned for the education of these athletes. This is the beginning of the end.

HJS I guarantee you that BC will absolutely lose recruits over this. Guarantee it. Not every kid they are recruiting will feel that the difference between what they can pay($1,400) and say what Clemson($2,220.00 more than BC)FSU($2,400.00 more)PSU($3,300.00 more)Rutgers( $1,500 more), MD($1,800.00 more)MIA($1,300.00 more) Pitt($1,900.00 more) and Wisc($3,000.00 more) is insignificant. Multiple these numbers x 4. Lets just say that a kid is 50/50 on Wisconsin v BC. Lets use Luben Figaro as an example. you don't think that when he finds out that he will get $12,000.00 more for going to Wisco than Bc that this wouldn't be an enormous swing factor. I don't think it will be a lot of kids, but 3-4 per year who will use it as a significant factor in their decision? I have no doubt about this.
hinghameagle
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 474
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 2:53 pm
Karma: 22

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby twballgame9 on Tue Apr 28, 2015 11:32 am

These numbers are made up. Just saying. Not saying there won't be a discrepancy, but these numbers are utterly meaningless.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34384
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby Corporal Funishment on Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:26 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These numbers are made up. Just saying. Not saying there won't be a discrepancy, but these numbers are utterly meaningless.


Everyone agrees that the number is meaningless in the sense that it will be calculated on a completely bogus basis designed to come out to the number the school wants - but the extra $10k a year that the recruit gets to spend on sneakers, jewelry, alcohol, and weed is quite meaningful.
Image
Proud member of the War Room Posse

EO "Worst Poster" award winner, '17
Unapologetic Catholic
LOCK HER UP - BUILD THE WALL - GOD IN SCHOOLS - BENGHAZI - FAKE BIRTH CERTIFICATE - PEDO CABAL- WIN THE WAR ON XMAS
User avatar
Corporal Funishment
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:10 pm
Karma: -144

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby 2001Eagle on Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:27 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These numbers are made up. Just saying. Not saying there won't be a discrepancy, but these numbers are utterly meaningless.


what do you mean? the article says that the figures will likely be recalculated going forward, but the research is based on actual figures, as quoted in this other article. Once again, it points out that BC is at the bottom.

http://chronicle.com/article/At-Least-15-Athletics-Programs/229229/
Coach hard. Love hard.
User avatar
2001Eagle
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:26 pm
Karma: 123

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby twballgame9 on Tue Apr 28, 2015 1:05 pm

2001Eagle {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These numbers are made up. Just saying. Not saying there won't be a discrepancy, but these numbers are utterly meaningless.


what do you mean? the article says that the figures will likely be recalculated going forward, but the research is based on actual figures, as quoted in this other article. Once again, it points out that BC is at the bottom.

http://chronicle.com/article/At-Least-15-Athletics-Programs/229229/


The numbers are artificial and created by financial aid departments for other purposes. They mean nothing.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34384
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby 2001Eagle on Tue Apr 28, 2015 3:26 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
2001Eagle {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These numbers are made up. Just saying. Not saying there won't be a discrepancy, but these numbers are utterly meaningless.


what do you mean? the article says that the figures will likely be recalculated going forward, but the research is based on actual figures, as quoted in this other article. Once again, it points out that BC is at the bottom.

http://chronicle.com/article/At-Least-15-Athletics-Programs/229229/


The numbers are artificial and created by financial aid departments for other purposes. They mean nothing.


They are created for the purposes of financial aid calculations. But, going forward, they will definitely mean something as they will be the basis for what schools can pay their scholarship athletes.
Coach hard. Love hard.
User avatar
2001Eagle
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3044
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:26 pm
Karma: 123

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby twballgame9 on Tue Apr 28, 2015 3:43 pm

2001Eagle {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
2001Eagle {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These numbers are made up. Just saying. Not saying there won't be a discrepancy, but these numbers are utterly meaningless.


what do you mean? the article says that the figures will likely be recalculated going forward, but the research is based on actual figures, as quoted in this other article. Once again, it points out that BC is at the bottom.

http://chronicle.com/article/At-Least-15-Athletics-Programs/229229/


The numbers are artificial and created by financial aid departments for other purposes. They mean nothing.


They are created for the purposes of financial aid calculations. But, going forward, they will definitely mean something as they will be the basis for what schools can pay their scholarship athletes.


If the financial aid numbers are used, they won't be used long. Leagues will put an end to that as the basis for the calculation.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34384
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby StratEagle on Tue Apr 28, 2015 5:42 pm

Did we ever get an explanation on Ronnie Blackmon?
StratEagle
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 930
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:04 pm
Karma: 188

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby BCSUPERFAN22 on Tue Apr 28, 2015 6:17 pm

StratEagle {l Wrote}:Did we ever get an explanation on Ronnie Blackmon?


He visitied in late March. I was expecting things to become official after that (now that he had visited since that was the one thing holding the staff back from accepting his commitment apparently).

247 and Rivals both list interest as BC being the favorite or high, but idk what is taking so long, maybe something academic ? Waiting for test scores ?
BCSUPERFAN22
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:21 pm
Karma: 125

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby ILikeBC on Tue Apr 28, 2015 6:33 pm

StratEagle {l Wrote}:Did we ever get an explanation on Ronnie Blackmon?



Study for your exams, Mitch.
User avatar
ILikeBC
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1367
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 6:48 pm
Karma: 194

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby CTeagle08 on Wed Apr 29, 2015 8:56 pm

https://twitter.com/kobaywhite/status/593589502586785793

New commit...3 star wr, offers from several P5, from bishop mcdevitt, PA
CTeagle08
n00b
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:13 pm
Karma: 3

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby BCSUPERFAN22 on Wed Apr 29, 2015 9:03 pm

Kobay White is a huge pickup. He's someone the staff has been on for a long time and has a really good offer sheet including MSU, GT, UMD, PITT, UVA, Cuse, Ill , rut, Temple. Also a few other guys with BC/D1 interest from McDevitt, most notably Anthony Long, a DT with fairly similar offer sheet
Last edited by BCSUPERFAN22 on Wed Apr 29, 2015 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BCSUPERFAN22
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:21 pm
Karma: 125

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby commavegarage on Wed Apr 29, 2015 9:11 pm

"Proud to say I'm officially committing to Boston college university❗️❗️ "

And his name is Kobay and he plays WR?

Sounds like he's about to become my favorite player
hey huerta if you readin this dont tell jimmy **** that i put xlax in teh chuck wagons...lol
commavegarage
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 7230
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:33 pm
Karma: 749

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby StratEagle on Wed Apr 29, 2015 9:19 pm

Good stuff.
StratEagle
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 930
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:04 pm
Karma: 188

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby Bunratty on Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:13 pm

Very good pickup. Over 1,100 receiving yards and 15 TD's last season for a good program. #15 player in PA.
Bunratty
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:00 pm
Karma: 27

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby ILikeBC on Wed Apr 29, 2015 11:45 pm

YEAH GO BCU :angrychicken :screamyeagle :screamyeagle :screamyeagle
User avatar
ILikeBC
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1367
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 6:48 pm
Karma: 194

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby MattTheEagle on Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:14 am

Excellent pickup. Welcome aboard Kobay! :screamyeagle

Looks like the kid has already sent a few tweets apologizing for the Boston College university error. He's not the first nor the last to make that mistake. I believe just last class a couple recruits did the same thing. It doesn't bother me nearly as much as the golden eagles thing. After all Boston College IS a university.
MattTheEagle
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1067
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:30 pm
Karma: 23

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby claver2010 on Thu Apr 30, 2015 7:12 am

kids got offers from half the acc, well done daz
Bush, George H W
Cosby, Bill
Disick, Scott
Flair, Ric
Griffin, Kathy
Khamenei, Ali
McCain, John
Pele
Soros, George
User avatar
claver2010
BC Guy
 
Posts: 20327
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 3386

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby DomingoOrtiz on Thu Apr 30, 2015 7:17 am

Very pleased with this class thus far. Daz really needs to bring in a quality DT (or 2) this year!
DomingoOrtiz
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 10003
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:39 am
Location: El Barrio
Karma: 234

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby commavegarage on Thu Apr 30, 2015 7:27 am

MattTheEagle {l Wrote}:Excellent pickup. Welcome aboard Kobay! :screamyeagle

Looks like the kid has already sent a few tweets apologizing for the Boston College university error. He's not the first nor the last to make that mistake. I believe just last class a couple recruits did the same thing. It doesn't bother me nearly as much as the golden eagles thing. After all Boston College IS a university.


doesnt bother me at all. i wish we had more like kobay. on both the football and basketball team
hey huerta if you readin this dont tell jimmy **** that i put xlax in teh chuck wagons...lol
commavegarage
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 7230
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:33 pm
Karma: 749

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby twballgame9 on Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:31 am

So wait, is the sky still falling?
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34384
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby flyingelvii on Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:50 am

MattTheEagle {l Wrote}:Excellent pickup. Welcome aboard Kobay! :screamyeagle

Looks like the kid has already sent a few tweets apologizing for the Boston College university error. He's not the first nor the last to make that mistake. I believe just last class a couple recruits did the same thing. It doesn't bother me nearly as much as the golden eagles thing. After all Boston College IS a university.

Tell that to our engineering school.
flyingelvii
Higgins Hall
 
Posts: 5871
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:28 pm
Karma: -50

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby MF73-Eleazar on Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:14 am

the number 15 player in PA is just a 3 star? don't get me wrong, i like that this kid committed in april. great pull by the staff, who's the recruiter for that region?
You what?
MF73-Eleazar
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2185
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:10 am
Location: New York City
Karma: -341

Re: 2016 Recruiting Thread

Postby Bunratty on Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:13 pm

MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:the number 15 player in PA is just a 3 star? don't get me wrong, i like that this kid committed in april. great pull by the staff, who's the recruiter for that region?

Not sure of the actual recruiter, but White was quoted as saying that he had developed a really close relationship with Leo Ferrine, and he had a lot to do with the commitment.
Bunratty
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:00 pm
Karma: 27

PreviousNext

Return to Alumni Stadium

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 284 guests

Untitled document