eepstein0 {l Wrote}:I had the close game at halftime. Does my analysis not count?
IT SURE DOES. You special snowflake you.
dt, acknowledge epstein. his self-esteem demands it.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:I had the close game at halftime. Does my analysis not count?
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:I had the close game at halftime. Does my analysis not count?
IT SURE DOES. You special snowflake you.
dt, acknowledge epstein. his self-esteem demands it.
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:b0mberMan {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:I had the close game at halftime. Does my analysis not count?
IT SURE DOES. You special snowflake you.
dt, acknowledge epstein. his self-esteem demands it.
Very sorry, eepstein. With 47 submissions and like 30 people offering witty commentary with each prediction, not everyone can be included. I didn't want to discount this gem: "Slow start leads to a close game at halftime, but BC runs for 300+ yards in the end and wins going away. Maine hits BC with one trick play. This will look like the Villanova game a couple years ago."
With that said, not to get into too much of a power trip, but my thread my rules. And I'm officially instituting a karma-like rule where if you complain about your comment not being included in the weekly summary your comment for the next week will automatically be excluded as well as a punishment.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:dtwalrus {l Wrote}:b0mberMan {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:I had the close game at halftime. Does my analysis not count?
IT SURE DOES. You special snowflake you.
dt, acknowledge epstein. his self-esteem demands it.
Very sorry, eepstein. With 47 submissions and like 30 people offering witty commentary with each prediction, not everyone can be included. I didn't want to discount this gem: "Slow start leads to a close game at halftime, but BC runs for 300+ yards in the end and wins going away. Maine hits BC with one trick play. This will look like the Villanova game a couple years ago."
With that said, not to get into too much of a power trip, but my thread my rules. And I'm officially instituting a karma-like rule where if you complain about your comment not being included in the weekly summary your comment for the next week will automatically be excluded as well as a punishment.
this kind of change in the rules after the contest has already started is something i can get behind. good on you, walrus. keep you your tyrant lite attitude and approach
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:karma begging doesn't usually work out among this group of asshats
hansen {l Wrote}:Ever since Nick won custody of Pedro's chalupa during their divorce, this has been the best weekly feature on this damn board.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:NIU was my first loss. 3-1
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Yeah, you are misguided by the Duck Dynasty, but this thread is awesome.
jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Yeah, you are misguided by the Duck Dynasty, but this thread is awesome.
I'm just glad Flutie quaked the starting rotation. Although he can't fly like Smith, his throws aren't nearly as fowl.
And Duck Dynasty is a solid nickname
jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:L35guy {l Wrote}:jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Yeah, you are misguided by the Duck Dynasty, but this thread is awesome.
I'm just glad Flutie quaked the starting rotation. Although he can't fly like Smith, his throws aren't nearly as fowl.
And Duck Dynasty is a solid nickname
So, you're saying it's Duck Dynasty's show from here on out and Smith is just a "decoy"? I hope he doesn't get "breasted out" by the Duke defense.
Whether Smtih be a decoy or a mere ducking, the o-line acts like a brace on Saturday and Flutie waddles out of Wallace Wade stadium with a win. Thus Flutie will have yet another feather to stick in his cap while TW will continue to crow about the depth chart.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These jokes are terrible and denigrate my wonderful new gimmick.
I laughed.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These jokes are terrible and denigrate my wonderful new gimmick.
I laughed.
it's not like this place to drive a new gimmick into the ground and ruin it well before it reaches it's true potential.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These jokes are terrible and denigrate my wonderful new gimmick.
I laughed.
it's not like this place to drive a new gimmick into the ground and ruin it well before it reaches it's true potential.
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These jokes are terrible and denigrate my wonderful new gimmick.
I laughed.
it's not like this place to drive a new gimmick into the ground and ruin it well before it reaches it's true potential.
Yeah. I mean if that were the case, Roethlesberger would have posted a response to the already.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:b0mberMan {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:These jokes are terrible and denigrate my wonderful new gimmick.
I laughed.
it's not like this place to drive a new gimmick into the ground and ruin it well before it reaches it's true potential.
Yeah. I mean if that were the case, Roethlesberger would have posted a response to the already.
He's out 4-6 weeks
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests