TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:and teddy is a jerk that roots for cheaters
God damn right.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:and teddy is a jerk that roots for cheaters
jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:and teddy is a jerk that roots for cheaters
God damn right.
If you aint cheatin you aint trying. But yes, the pats are awesome and will win the super bowl.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:also, the nursing school is in a league that pays it millions of dollars. it's called being an accredited university and it's what gets the students and tuition dollars into the school's pockets.
jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:Endless Mike {l Wrote}:jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:and teddy is a jerk that roots for cheaters
God damn right.
If you aint cheatin you aint trying. But yes, the pats are awesome and will win the super bowl.
HGH? Isn't that more of a Seahawks thing? That's weak.
I think its an NFL thing in general. I'm a pats fan and couldnt give a crap about ball-gate. I will let the brilliant minds, such as HJS, discuss the topic ad nauseam and also pontificate on whether Tom Brady will be suspended and how vegas would react to such a situation.
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:I can't recall any Pats HGH suspension outside of Harrison a while back but Spikes recently got suspended for Adderall a couple years ago, which led to his amazing quote describing the subject of "It is what it is, but it ain't what you think." Really thought he'd be the one behind bars instead of Hernandez but, alas, what do I know.
Note: When asked about if any players expressed concern over BC’s decision to vote against cost-of-attendance, Addazio laughed it off, commenting: “No [laugh] nope, no, no, no. I”m not sure that guys that we’re going to be involved with, that it’s going to be their first priority. We’re involved with guys that are really evaluating the weight of their academic degree at Boston College, they’ve got bigger picture in mind. Cost-of-attendance, is, you know. They’re coming here for a bigger picture, which I really appreciate. They’re not concerned about that, our guys really aren’t concerned about all that stuff. That’s all going to work out just fine. That’s a lot about a little.
dtwalrus {l Wrote}:Some further explanation (i.e. Leahy made the call)
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:i heard this is the reason daz stayed
hawaiirob {l Wrote}:Good read on student athletes or "players" as the writer prefers to call them. I think we are getting close to a tipping point moment in college sports. Not sure how it plays out, but some school is going to have the stones to quit turning the blind eye to the prevailing culture.
Jack Swarbrick has this vision. In it, schools that want to pay their athletes and those that want to adhere to a strict educational mission have a decision to make.
In his vision, a players union may not be the worst thing in the world. In it, Congress may have a hand in governing college sports.
The Notre Dame athletic director says there is currently a “cultural divide” in college athletics, one that may make the traditional version of conference realignment look like a game of jacks.
Swarbrick isn't necessarily advocating upheaval, just defining the future. The legal, moral and collegiate pressures may make it inevitable for a semi-pro division of college athletics to emerge.
“There's going to be Congressional intervention [in college athletics] or there's going to be more than one intercollegiate athletic association ….” he said.
“You don't like these set of rules? Go play in that association.”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests