BCHerbert {l Wrote}:Maybe I'm not the guy that should provide a warm welcome for the PSU fans.
Nonsense, you'll make them feel right at home.
BCHerbert {l Wrote}:Maybe I'm not the guy that should provide a warm welcome for the PSU fans.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Best part is that the scandal is the only reason psu has been relevant since the 80s
Since I know the mouthbreathers from Happy Valley are reading, I said 80s, not 90s. You fucking sucked in the 90s too.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Anyone been to Happy Valley? I saw us beat them in 1992 35-32, attendance 96,130. Foley, Mitchell and Chuckie "The Duke of Runningham" Dukes had huge games. OJ McDuffie almost singlehandedly beat us in the 2nd half.
claver2010 {l Wrote}:this thread is begging for contribution from the nexus: http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=157&f=1395&t=13481784
commavegarage {l Wrote}:"$12M is a chunk of change because academics and atmoshpere no longer sells."
Since when do they have academics to sell?
commavegarage {l Wrote}:"$12M is a chunk of change because academics and atmoshpere no longer sells."
Since when do they have academics to sell?
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Best part is that the scandal is the only reason psu has been relevant since the 80s
Since I know the mouthbreathers from Happy Valley are reading, I said 80s, not 90s. You fucking sucked in the 90s too.
commavegarage {l Wrote}:notre dame made the championship 3 years ago. calling them "save one season" irrelevant is ridiculous.
talon {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:notre dame made the championship 3 years ago. calling them "save one season" irrelevant is ridiculous.
What years were ND not irrelevant, other than the year they lost in the national championship game?
DrJackRyan {l Wrote}:Can someone come up with a joke that combines Jerry Sandusky, Bryan Pata and the Hell Football team?
commavegarage {l Wrote}:talon {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:notre dame made the championship 3 years ago. calling them "save one season" irrelevant is ridiculous.
What years were ND not irrelevant, other than the year they lost in the national championship game?
what years was george bush president, other than the years he was president?
Brooklyneagle {l Wrote}:Some of you have a pretty high/pretty strange standard for "relevant", in keeping with this board's occasional tendency to wild exaggeration. If being in the national championship game is the measure of meaningfulness, how relevant is that to the exertions of all the rest of us? Makes the USC victory, not to mention the Pinstripe bowl, pretty meaningless. Is this not obvious?
(As some of us learned at BC, "relevant" is an "intentional" term: something is never just relevant; it is "relevant to" something or someone. If you decide that that something is the national championship, fine. That's YOUR decision. But you don't necessarily have grounds for assuming that's everyone else's definition -- which it evidently isn't -- since most of us care deeply about lots of contests that have no practical relationship to a national championship.)
commavegarage {l Wrote}:talon {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:notre dame made the championship 3 years ago. calling them "save one season" irrelevant is ridiculous.
What years were ND not irrelevant, other than the year they lost in the national championship game?
what years was george bush president, other than the years he was president?
commavegarage {l Wrote}:maybe its because I'm part of the & movement at bc, but from what I've experienced the folk prior to the mod fence at bc just have such an inferiority complex with nd. maybe its because i was there for 1 jags and 3 spaz years so i didn't get a good football experience as a whole, maybe its bc i was a child during the lou holtz / coughlin years so i didn't live the upsets / fake punt etc. maybe because i only was there during the acc years so the ND games whenever they come about are about as important to me as the CSU game was this year.
i have no problem in saying that over the last decade or so nd has made 3 bcs bowls & a national championship game and therefore in my eyes are relevant (especially compared to penn state ool). seeing as only a maximum of 20 schools could've made the championship over that period I'm not sure how you could argue otherwise.
i also have no problem saying i view ND as a peer school & i wish more schools in football were like us & them than fsu & auburn
commavegarage {l Wrote}:how does one define relevance?
success: 30% of the time they've been in a BCS bowl. 10% of the time in the national championship. id take that.
spotlight: only have a personal TV deal
poll rankings: they always get propped up. that inherently makes them relevant
tv ratings: only played in the 2nd most watched game this year in college football.
they are relevant any way you slice it. i don't see whats wrong in admitting that
i can call them relevant and still not root for them
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:how does one define relevance?
success: 30% of the time they've been in a BCS bowl. 10% of the time in the national championship. id take that.
spotlight: only have a personal TV deal
poll rankings: they always get propped up. that inherently makes them relevant
tv ratings: only played in the 2nd most watched game this year in college football.
they are relevant any way you slice it. i don't see whats wrong in admitting that
i can call them relevant and still not root for them
When you name the top 20-25 programs in college football over the last two decades, does ND make your list? If so, leave Southie or South Bend and try again.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests