DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}: For all their experience, this OL is a very ho-hum group
Nospace's head just exploded
Re the WRs, I thnk all you need to know is Bordner is our leading receiver after 2 games.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}: For all their experience, this OL is a very ho-hum group
claver2010 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}: For all their experience, this OL is a very ho-hum group
Nospace's head just exploded
Re the WRs, I thnk all you need to know is Bordner is our leading receiver after 2 games.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:BC got Zed treatment in the trenches on both sides of the ball. The remaining problems are irrelevant as long at that is the case, as it will be this weekend.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:BC got Zed treatment in the trenches on both sides of the ball. The remaining problems are irrelevant as long at that is the case, as it will be this weekend.
Yes.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:BC got Zed treatment in the trenches on both sides of the ball. The remaining problems are irrelevant as long at that is the case, as it will be this weekend.
Yes.
Going to get destroyed on both lines this weekend
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:BC got Zed treatment in the trenches on both sides of the ball. The remaining problems are irrelevant as long at that is the case, as it will be this weekend.
Yes.
Going to get destroyed on both lines this weekend
Probably. But I don't expect USC to come out looking very sharp. I don't think BC gets rocketshipped here. I'm taking the points in Claver's pool.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:BC got Zed treatment in the trenches on both sides of the ball. The remaining problems are irrelevant as long at that is the case, as it will be this weekend.
Yes.
Going to get destroyed on both lines this weekend
Probably. But I don't expect USC to come out looking very sharp. I don't think BC gets rocketshipped here. I'm taking the points in Claver's pool.
BC is not going to get rocketshipped only because the clock will move very quickly. I'm thinking somewhere around 28-10.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:BC got Zed treatment in the trenches on both sides of the ball. The remaining problems are irrelevant as long at that is the case, as it will be this weekend.
Yes.
Going to get destroyed on both lines this weekend
Probably. But I don't expect USC to come out looking very sharp. I don't think BC gets rocketshipped here. I'm taking the points in Claver's pool.
BC is not going to get rocketshipped only because the clock will move very quickly. I'm thinking somewhere around 28-10.
I'm thinking 55-10. Unless USC just totally falls asleep, they're going to maul BC. That up-tempo offense will destroy our defense
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:BC got Zed treatment in the trenches on both sides of the ball. The remaining problems are irrelevant as long at that is the case, as it will be this weekend.
Yes.
Going to get destroyed on both lines this weekend
Probably. But I don't expect USC to come out looking very sharp. I don't think BC gets rocketshipped here. I'm taking the points in Claver's pool.
BC is not going to get rocketshipped only because the clock will move very quickly. I'm thinking somewhere around 28-10.
I'm thinking 55-10. Unless USC just totally falls asleep, they're going to maul BC. That up-tempo offense will destroy our defense
If the USC team that played Stanford shows up, they are not scoring 50+ on anyone.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:BC got Zed treatment in the trenches on both sides of the ball. The remaining problems are irrelevant as long at that is the case, as it will be this weekend.
Yes.
Going to get destroyed on both lines this weekend
Probably. But I don't expect USC to come out looking very sharp. I don't think BC gets rocketshipped here. I'm taking the points in Claver's pool.
BC is not going to get rocketshipped only because the clock will move very quickly. I'm thinking somewhere around 28-10.
I'm thinking 55-10. Unless USC just totally falls asleep, they're going to maul BC. That up-tempo offense will destroy our defense
If the USC team that played Stanford shows up, they are not scoring 50+ on anyone.
this has convinced me to change my original selection. mrs. nospace, i'm editing my original selection to choose southern cal instead of bc
eagle216 {l Wrote}:I vote rocketshipping. You lesser minds can argue over what color the rocket will be, how many passengers, how many thrusters, etc., but this game will absolutely, positively, in one form of another, be an unmitigated exhibition in rocketshipping.
MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:eagle216 {l Wrote}:I vote rocketshipping. You lesser minds can argue over what color the rocket will be, how many passengers, how many thrusters, etc., but this game will absolutely, positively, in one form of another, be an unmitigated exhibition in rocketshipping.
I don't disagree, but we all thought the '13 FSU game would be a rocketshipping as well. And '13 Clemson.
maxwell22 {l Wrote}:Since Pitt scored 30 I'm guessing USC will score 50 plus!
USC is a better team than Pitt!
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:eagle216 {l Wrote}:I vote rocketshipping. You lesser minds can argue over what color the rocket will be, how many passengers, how many thrusters, etc., but this game will absolutely, positively, in one form of another, be an unmitigated exhibition in rocketshipping.
I don't disagree, but we all thought the '13 FSU game would be a rocketshipping as well. And '13 Clemson.
The opponents also didn't make it to the stadium until about halftime in those two games
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:eagle216 {l Wrote}:I vote rocketshipping. You lesser minds can argue over what color the rocket will be, how many passengers, how many thrusters, etc., but this game will absolutely, positively, in one form of another, be an unmitigated exhibition in rocketshipping.
I don't disagree, but we all thought the '13 FSU game would be a rocketshipping as well. And '13 Clemson.
The opponents also didn't make it to the stadium until about halftime in those two games
Revisionist history. FSU did most of their damage in the second quarter - the second half was back and forth
BC was beating Clemson 14-10 at the start of the fourth quarter.
To denigrate what BC did in those two games is absurd. BC was the better team for most of the Clemson game.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:eagle216 {l Wrote}:I vote rocketshipping. You lesser minds can argue over what color the rocket will be, how many passengers, how many thrusters, etc., but this game will absolutely, positively, in one form of another, be an unmitigated exhibition in rocketshipping.
I don't disagree, but we all thought the '13 FSU game would be a rocketshipping as well. And '13 Clemson.
The opponents also didn't make it to the stadium until about halftime in those two games
Revisionist history. FSU did most of their damage in the second quarter - the second half was back and forth
BC was beating Clemson 14-10 at the start of the fourth quarter.
To denigrate what BC did in those two games is absurd. BC was the better team for most of the Clemson game.
this
eepstein, that post was bad even for you.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:eagle216 {l Wrote}:I vote rocketshipping. You lesser minds can argue over what color the rocket will be, how many passengers, how many thrusters, etc., but this game will absolutely, positively, in one form of another, be an unmitigated exhibition in rocketshipping.
I don't disagree, but we all thought the '13 FSU game would be a rocketshipping as well. And '13 Clemson.
The opponents also didn't make it to the stadium until about halftime in those two games
Revisionist history. FSU did most of their damage in the second quarter - the second half was back and forth
BC was beating Clemson 14-10 at the start of the fourth quarter.
To denigrate what BC did in those two games is absurd. BC was the better team for most of the Clemson game.
this
eepstein, that post was bad even for you.
I don't disagree with the point that BC was the better team. It doesn't take away from the fact that those two teams should have blown us off the field. Clemson was a turnover machine in that game.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:eagle216 {l Wrote}:I vote rocketshipping. You lesser minds can argue over what color the rocket will be, how many passengers, how many thrusters, etc., but this game will absolutely, positively, in one form of another, be an unmitigated exhibition in rocketshipping.
I don't disagree, but we all thought the '13 FSU game would be a rocketshipping as well. And '13 Clemson.
The opponents also didn't make it to the stadium until about halftime in those two games
Revisionist history. FSU did most of their damage in the second quarter - the second half was back and forth
BC was beating Clemson 14-10 at the start of the fourth quarter.
To denigrate what BC did in those two games is absurd. BC was the better team for most of the Clemson game.
this
eepstein, that post was bad even for you.
I don't disagree with the point that BC was the better team. It doesn't take away from the fact that those two teams should have blown us off the field. Clemson was a turnover machine in that game.
Should've blown us off the field and didn't actually supports the point of those that don't think it will be a rocketship, like the original point you argued with. I'd let this one go.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:eagle216 {l Wrote}:I vote rocketshipping. You lesser minds can argue over what color the rocket will be, how many passengers, how many thrusters, etc., but this game will absolutely, positively, in one form of another, be an unmitigated exhibition in rocketshipping.
I don't disagree, but we all thought the '13 FSU game would be a rocketshipping as well. And '13 Clemson.
The opponents also didn't make it to the stadium until about halftime in those two games
Revisionist history. FSU did most of their damage in the second quarter - the second half was back and forth
BC was beating Clemson 14-10 at the start of the fourth quarter.
To denigrate what BC did in those two games is absurd. BC was the better team for most of the Clemson game.
this
eepstein, that post was bad even for you.
I don't disagree with the point that BC was the better team. It doesn't take away from the fact that those two teams should have blown us off the field. Clemson was a turnover machine in that game.
Should've blown us off the field and didn't actually supports the point of those that don't think it will be a rocketship, like the original point you argued with. I'd let this one go.
You're assuming this years BC team is equivalent to last years team
commavegarage {l Wrote}:you can't possibly be this bored
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 219 guests