EagleOutsider.com

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:11.43 is not fast. Wouldn't even get him to states in MA.

Lie. http://massachusettsstatechampionships.runnerspace.com/eprofile.php?event_id=462&do=news&news_id=265971

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Your telling me that a kid who couldn't run fast enough to even attend states in MA (a generally slow state) is fast enough to run a 4.39 40?

No, I'm calling you a liar.

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Jet smith was probably about a 4.39 and the kid ran a 10.2 100m. You people are ridiculous

Lie. http://www.bceagles.com/sports/m-track/spec-rel/041308aaa.html (thank you to whomever already called this lying liar out for this lie, while I was doing work).

DuxEagle26 is a liar.

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:There IS a correlation between 100 and 40 times. It's just not so strong that it would be useful in using one to predict the other. A shorter sprint such as a 40 is much more about acceleration. A sprint of 100m is going to have more to do with maximum speed. Maybe Borgersen accelerates quickly but his top speed isn't that great. If you put him in a 100m race with Jet Smith he could probably keep up for the first couple of seconds then he'd get smoked from that point on.

Thank you for actually having a brain and considering my reasoning, BUT borgerson's highlight tape doesn't show any electric quickness which is what led me to look into this in the first place.

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:There IS a correlation between 100 and 40 times. It's just not so strong that it would be useful in using one to predict the other. A shorter sprint such as a 40 is much more about acceleration. A sprint of 100m is going to have more to do with maximum speed. Maybe Borgersen accelerates quickly but his top speed isn't that great. If you put him in a 100m race with Jet Smith he could probably keep up for the first couple of seconds then he'd get smoked from that point on.

Thank you for actually having a brain and considering my reasoning, BUT borgerson's highlight tape doesn't show any electric quickness which is what led me to look into this in the first place.

I was rejecting your reasoning. You were the one who said his 100 time wasn't consistent with his 40 time.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:11.43 is not fast. Wouldn't even get him to states in MA.

Lie. http://massachusettsstatechampionships.runnerspace.com/eprofile.php?event_id=462&do=news&news_id=265971

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Your telling me that a kid who couldn't run fast enough to even attend states in MA (a generally slow state) is fast enough to run a 4.39 40?

No, I'm calling you a liar.

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Jet smith was probably about a 4.39 and the kid ran a 10.2 100m. You people are ridiculous

Lie. http://www.bceagles.com/sports/m-track/spec-rel/041308aaa.html (thank you to whomever already called this lying liar out for this lie, while I was doing work).

DuxEagle26 is a liar.

The irony is that Smith was actually much more impressive in the 200 than the 100. Once he got up to speed, he could flipping fly. Which is why he was not a good football player but was a decent returner. He had track speed but no football quickness. First 40 wasn't his best 40.

If this wasn't so stupid, I'd note that the start of every race contains the first 40, but not every 40 in a race contains the start. Explosive athletes start very well, but don't necessarily finish the 100 well. For example, who would have the best time at 40m in this race:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:There IS a correlation between 100 and 40 times. It's just not so strong that it would be useful in using one to predict the other. A shorter sprint such as a 40 is much more about acceleration. A sprint of 100m is going to have more to do with maximum speed. Maybe Borgersen accelerates quickly but his top speed isn't that great. If you put him in a 100m race with Jet Smith he could probably keep up for the first couple of seconds then he'd get smoked from that point on.

Thank you for actually having a brain and considering my reasoning, BUT borgerson's highlight tape doesn't show any electric quickness which is what led me to look into this in the first place.

I was rejecting your reasoning. You were the one who said his 100 time wasn't consistent with his 40 time.

I was wondering if he was going to realize he was agreeing with someone arguing with him.

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:There IS a correlation between 100 and 40 times. It's just not so strong that it would be useful in using one to predict the other. A shorter sprint such as a 40 is much more about acceleration. A sprint of 100m is going to have more to do with maximum speed. Maybe Borgersen accelerates quickly but his top speed isn't that great. If you put him in a 100m race with Jet Smith he could probably keep up for the first couple of seconds then he'd get smoked from that point on.

Thank you for actually having a brain and considering my reasoning, BUT borgerson's highlight tape doesn't show any electric quickness which is what led me to look into this in the first place.

I was rejecting your reasoning. You were the one who said his 100 time wasn't consistent with his 40 time.

I was wondering if he was going to realize he was agreeing with someone arguing with him.

do you guys get jokes?

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:There IS a correlation between 100 and 40 times. It's just not so strong that it would be useful in using one to predict the other. A shorter sprint such as a 40 is much more about acceleration. A sprint of 100m is going to have more to do with maximum speed. Maybe Borgersen accelerates quickly but his top speed isn't that great. If you put him in a 100m race with Jet Smith he could probably keep up for the first couple of seconds then he'd get smoked from that point on.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:11.43 is not fast. Wouldn't even get him to states in MA.

Lie. http://massachusettsstatechampionships.runnerspace.com/eprofile.php?event_id=462&do=news&news_id=265971

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Your telling me that a kid who couldn't run fast enough to even attend states in MA (a generally slow state) is fast enough to run a 4.39 40?

No, I'm calling you a liar.

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Jet smith was probably about a 4.39 and the kid ran a 10.2 100m. You people are ridiculous

Lie. http://www.bceagles.com/sports/m-track/spec-rel/041308aaa.html (thank you to whomever already called this lying liar out for this lie, while I was doing work).

DuxEagle26 is a liar.

The irony is that Smith was actually much more impressive in the 200 than the 100. Once he got up to speed, he could flipping fly. Which is why he was not a good football player but was a decent returner. He had track speed but no football quickness. First 40 wasn't his best 40.

If this wasn't so stupid, I'd note that the start of every race contains the first 40, but not every 40 in a race contains the start. Explosive athletes start very well, but don't necessarily finish the 100 well. For example, who would have the best time at 40m in this race:

they guy with the spatula legs that killed his girlfriend?

trackcoach {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:There IS a correlation between 100 and 40 times. It's just not so strong that it would be useful in using one to predict the other. A shorter sprint such as a 40 is much more about acceleration. A sprint of 100m is going to have more to do with maximum speed. Maybe Borgersen accelerates quickly but his top speed isn't that great. If you put him in a 100m race with Jet Smith he could probably keep up for the first couple of seconds then he'd get smoked from that point on.

Ran against Jet Smith. Kid had one of the worst starts in the state but had the best top end speed. You could be ahead of him for the first 30m of a race and by the time you were at 80m he was at the finish.
Scary to think how good he would have been if he ever got the first 30 meters of a track race down.

trackcoach {l Wrote}:All the recruiting camps and high school football coaches that rely on hand times (or averaging hand times of multiple timers) are just lying to the athletes to give them a better impression of the schools or trying to get more money out of kids for camps and services.

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:There IS a correlation between 100 and 40 times. It's just not so strong that it would be useful in using one to predict the other. A shorter sprint such as a 40 is much more about acceleration. A sprint of 100m is going to have more to do with maximum speed. Maybe Borgersen accelerates quickly but his top speed isn't that great. If you put him in a 100m race with Jet Smith he could probably keep up for the first couple of seconds then he'd get smoked from that point on.

StratEagle {l Wrote}:He's quick, but nothing about his tape screams sub 4.4 speed. That would make him one of the faster players in the NFL.

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Running is running, a slow 100 runner will not be a fast 40 runner. Sorry

This is epic levels of stupid. Is a fast 100m runner automatically a fast miler?

okay i'll clarify, SPRINTING IS SPRINTING. 100=sprint, 40=sprint mile=jog
remember sprinting? that thing you use to be able to do before your hip replacement old man.

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Running is running, a slow 100 runner will not be a fast 40 runner. Sorry

This is epic levels of stupid. Is a fast 100m runner automatically a fast miler?

okay i'll clarify, SPRINTING IS SPRINTING. 100=sprint, 40=sprint mile=jog
remember sprinting? that thing you use to be able to do before your hip replacement old man.

this is the most fucktarded post of all.

SPRINTING IS SPRINTING? WTF does that even mean.

and, the fastest mile is something like 3:43 something which averages to like a 55s 400m.
If you think under 60s for a 400 is a "jog", you must be a fucking track star.
i don't know many people that can jog four 60s quarters.

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Running is running, a slow 100 runner will not be a fast 40 runner. Sorry

This is epic levels of stupid. Is a fast 100m runner automatically a fast miler?

okay i'll clarify, SPRINTING IS SPRINTING. 100=sprint, 40=sprint mile=jog
remember sprinting? that thing you use to be able to do before your hip replacement old man.

this is the most fucktarded post of all.

SPRINTING IS SPRINTING? WTF does that even mean.

and, the fastest mile is something like 3:43 something which averages to like a 55s 400m.
If you think under 60s for a 400 is a "jog", you must be a fucking track star.
i don't know many people that can jog four 60s quarters.

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Running is running, a slow 100 runner will not be a fast 40 runner. Sorry

This is epic levels of stupid. Is a fast 100m runner automatically a fast miler?

okay i'll clarify, SPRINTING IS SPRINTING. 100=sprint, 40=sprint mile=jog
remember sprinting? that thing you use to be able to do before your hip replacement old man.

SPRINTING IS SPRINTING? WTF does that even mean.

I'm genuinely concerned for your mental health .

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Running is running, a slow 100 runner will not be a fast 40 runner. Sorry

This is epic levels of stupid. Is a fast 100m runner automatically a fast miler?

okay i'll clarify, SPRINTING IS SPRINTING. 100=sprint, 40=sprint mile=jog
remember sprinting? that thing you use to be able to do before your hip replacement old man.

SPRINTING IS SPRINTING? WTF does that even mean.

I'm genuinely concerned for your mental health .

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Running is running, a slow 100 runner will not be a fast 40 runner. Sorry

This is epic levels of stupid. Is a fast 100m runner automatically a fast miler?

okay i'll clarify, SPRINTING IS SPRINTING. 100=sprint, 40=sprint mile=jog
remember sprinting? that thing you use to be able to do before your hip replacement old man.

SPRINTING IS SPRINTING? WTF does that even mean.

I'm genuinely concerned for your mental health .

I'm genuinely concerned for your ability to post correctly on a blog.
don't you know that messageboardery is sirius bizness?

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Running is running, a slow 100 runner will not be a fast 40 runner. Sorry

This is epic levels of stupid. Is a fast 100m runner automatically a fast miler?

okay i'll clarify, SPRINTING IS SPRINTING. 100=sprint, 40=sprint mile=jog
remember sprinting? that thing you use to be able to do before your hip replacement old man.

SPRINTING IS SPRINTING? WTF does that even mean.

I'm genuinely concerned for your mental health .

I'm genuinely concerned for your ability to post correctly on a blog.
don't you know that messageboardery is sirius bizness?

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Running is running, a slow 100 runner will not be a fast 40 runner. Sorry

This is epic levels of stupid. Is a fast 100m runner automatically a fast miler?

okay i'll clarify, SPRINTING IS SPRINTING. 100=sprint, 40=sprint mile=jog
remember sprinting? that thing you use to be able to do before your hip replacement old man.

SPRINTING IS SPRINTING? WTF does that even mean.

I'm genuinely concerned for your mental health .

I'm genuinely concerned for your ability to post correctly on a blog.
don't you know that messageboardery is sirius bizness?

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Worst discussion in the history of EO?

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Worst discussion in the history of EO?

flyingelvii {l Wrote}:

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

hansen {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

DuxEagle26 {l Wrote}:Running is running, a slow 100 runner will not be a fast 40 runner. Sorry

This is epic levels of stupid. Is a fast 100m runner automatically a fast miler?

okay i'll clarify, SPRINTING IS SPRINTING. 100=sprint, 40=sprint mile=jog
remember sprinting? that thing you use to be able to do before your hip replacement old man.

SPRINTING IS SPRINTING? WTF does that even mean.

I'm genuinely concerned for your mental health .

I'm genuinely concerned for your ability to post correctly on a blog.
don't you know that messageboardery is sirius bizness?

It's a message board. ATL has the blog. How people still mess this up is beyond me.

2001Eagle {l Wrote}:... I don't remember which one.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

2001Eagle {l Wrote}:... I don't remember which one.

do you want to make it with endlessmike? it sure seems like it