eagle9903 {l Wrote}:why has Ray decommitting become a done deal? general pessimism, or reasons?
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:Upgrades to Alumni stadium are needed to attract more fans absolutely not and recruits probably not. Gladchuk wanted to close in the upper deck after seeing the big improvement in the game day atmosphere from closing in the lower deck. The stadium was sold out on a season ticket basis by giving 1 free garage parking pass for every 4 season tickets purchased. It worked, DBS and crazy parking prices and tailgating rules fucked everything up.
The bull shit we keep hearing about not having the money to build an indoor building is coming from Leahy only. no its not We can over 35 million per year in all forms of football revenue including fundraising if i need to spell out how the athletic department funds programs, you're already beyond saving. It's time for Leahy to do what every other P5 school is doing and reinvest that money into new facilities. Standford, Baylor and TCU are all prime examples for Leahy to follow.you check out stanfords attendance this year?
commavegarage {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:Upgrades to Alumni stadium are needed to attract more fans absolutely not and recruits probably not. Gladchuk wanted to close in the upper deck after seeing the big improvement in the game day atmosphere from closing in the lower deck. The stadium was sold out on a season ticket basis by giving 1 free garage parking pass for every 4 season tickets purchased. It worked, DBS and crazy parking prices and tailgating rules fucked everything up.
The bull shit we keep hearing about not having the money to build an indoor building is coming from Leahy only. no its not We can over 35 million per year in all forms of football revenue including fundraising if i need to spell out how the athletic department funds programs, you're already beyond saving. It's time for Leahy to do what every other P5 school is doing and reinvest that money into new facilities. Standford, Baylor and TCU are all prime examples for Leahy to follow.you check out stanfords attendance this year?
I'll take this step by step (see the red)
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:Upgrades to Alumni stadium are needed to attract more fans absolutely not and recruits probably not. Gladchuk wanted to close in the upper deck after seeing the big improvement in the game day atmosphere from closing in the lower deck. The stadium was sold out on a season ticket basis by giving 1 free garage parking pass for every 4 season tickets purchased. It worked, DBS and crazy parking prices and tailgating rules fucked everything up.
The bull shit we keep hearing about not having the money to build an indoor building is coming from Leahy only. no its not We can over 35 million per year in all forms of football revenue including fundraising if i need to spell out how the athletic department funds programs, you're already beyond saving. It's time for Leahy to do what every other P5 school is doing and reinvest that money into new facilities. Standford, Baylor and TCU are all prime examples for Leahy to follow.you check out stanfords attendance this year?
I'll take this step by step (see the red)
eaglekeeper posting this shit in the recruiting w3ird0z thread is why he isn't running away in his asshat head-to-head. if he posted it in non-w3ird0z threads that more people actually read... he'd be up there with roonie, teddy and hansen
hawaiirob {l Wrote}:Me thinks that losing Wilkins helps pull Crawford.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:Upgrades to Alumni stadium are needed to attract more fans absolutely not and recruits probably not. Gladchuk wanted to close in the upper deck after seeing the big improvement in the game day atmosphere from closing in the lower deck. The stadium was sold out on a season ticket basis by giving 1 free garage parking pass for every 4 season tickets purchased. It worked, DBS and crazy parking prices and tailgating rules fucked everything up.
The bull shit we keep hearing about not having the money to build an indoor building is coming from Leahy only. no its not We can over 35 million per year in all forms of football revenue including fundraising if i need to spell out how the athletic department funds programs, you're already beyond saving. It's time for Leahy to do what every other P5 school is doing and reinvest that money into new facilities. Standford, Baylor and TCU are all prime examples for Leahy to follow.you check out stanfords attendance this year?
I'll take this step by step (see the red)
eaglekeeper posting this shit in the recruiting w3ird0z thread is why he isn't running away in his asshat head-to-head. if he posted it in non-w3ird0z threads that more people actually read... he'd be up there with roonie, teddy and hansen
people reading the depths of the MaryAnns board are reading the recruiting weirdos threads. Just sayin.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:Upgrades to Alumni stadium are needed to attract more fans absolutely not and recruits probably not. Gladchuk wanted to close in the upper deck after seeing the big improvement in the game day atmosphere from closing in the lower deck. The stadium was sold out on a season ticket basis by giving 1 free garage parking pass for every 4 season tickets purchased. It worked, DBS and crazy parking prices and tailgating rules fucked everything up.
The bull shit we keep hearing about not having the money to build an indoor building is coming from Leahy only. no its not We can over 35 million per year in all forms of football revenue including fundraising if i need to spell out how the athletic department funds programs, you're already beyond saving. It's time for Leahy to do what every other P5 school is doing and reinvest that money into new facilities. Standford, Baylor and TCU are all prime examples for Leahy to follow.you check out stanfords attendance this year?
I'll take this step by step (see the red)
eaglekeeper posting this shit in the recruiting w3ird0z thread is why he isn't running away in his asshat head-to-head. if he posted it in non-w3ird0z threads that more people actually read... he'd be up there with roonie, teddy and hansen
people reading the depths of the MaryAnns board are reading the recruiting weirdos threads. Just sayin.
Is Eaglekeeper making a stealth attempt to win AssHat of the year?
I am very suspicious
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
2014 Eagle {l Wrote}:hawaiirob {l Wrote}:Me thinks that losing Wilkins helps pull Crawford.
Hopefully it will help convince Ray to stay as well
HJS {l Wrote}:2014 Eagle {l Wrote}:hawaiirob {l Wrote}:Me thinks that losing Wilkins helps pull Crawford.
Hopefully it will help convince Ray to stay as well
Can someone explain how losing a chance at one of the best DT prospects out there would help with Ray? Crawford I get... but that is assuming we were back-burnering him. I'm thinking that if he wanted in, he would have done it by now.
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:2014 Eagle {l Wrote}:hawaiirob {l Wrote}:Me thinks that losing Wilkins helps pull Crawford.
Hopefully it will help convince Ray to stay as well
Can someone explain how losing a chance at one of the best DT prospects out there would help with Ray? Crawford I get... but that is assuming we were back-burnering him. I'm thinking that if he wanted in, he would have done it by now.
I can
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:2014 Eagle {l Wrote}:hawaiirob {l Wrote}:Me thinks that losing Wilkins helps pull Crawford.
Hopefully it will help convince Ray to stay as well
Can someone explain how losing a chance at one of the best DT prospects out there would help with Ray? Crawford I get... but that is assuming we were back-burnering him. I'm thinking that if he wanted in, he would have done it by now.
I can
oh
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:2014 Eagle {l Wrote}:hawaiirob {l Wrote}:Me thinks that losing Wilkins helps pull Crawford.
Hopefully it will help convince Ray to stay as well
Can someone explain how losing a chance at one of the best DT prospects out there would help with Ray? Crawford I get... but that is assuming we were back-burnering him. I'm thinking that if he wanted in, he would have done it by now.
I can
BCEagle14 {l Wrote}:Besides trying to stop any of the current commits from decommitting, who is the staff still targeting for this year's class?
BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:why has Ray decommitting become a done deal? general pessimism, or reasons?
Nothing is a done deal. EA lists his commitment as soft. He stated that he has recently received an offer from Indiana which has made him think about looking around. He has also stated that if Lousiville or Kentucky were to offer he would strongly consider them.
The biggest concern is that if a program like Indiana offering is making him reconsider, there has to be something brewing.
Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:why has Ray decommitting become a done deal? general pessimism, or reasons?
Nothing is a done deal. EA lists his commitment as soft. He stated that he has recently received an offer from Indiana which has made him think about looking around. He has also stated that if Lousiville or Kentucky were to offer he would strongly consider them.
The biggest concern is that if a program like Indiana offering is making him reconsider, there has to be something brewing.
I am hearing that at this point he is sticking with BC. Louisville was sniffing around but he still wants to go to BC. I am sure that can change overnight as we have seen with these kids.
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:BC is the cheapest outfit in the ACC. SA has made it clear to Leahy that an indoor building and major upgrades to the stadium are needed to stay competitive. The cost estimate for the indoor field is 40 million and SA received a commitment that it will be built. Stadium upgrades are being discussed, but they have not come up with a final plan. Gladchuk had all of this scheduled to be built back in the 90's when the cost would have been significantly less. Leahy opposed the facilities calling athletics a distraction to the mission of BC.
RECRUITS WANT THE BEST. Stanford just got a 4 star WR. They don't need to fill their stadium to get recruiting dividends.
HJS {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:BC is the cheapest outfit in the ACC. SA has made it clear to Leahy that an indoor building and major upgrades to the stadium are needed to stay competitive. The cost estimate for the indoor field is 40 million and SA received a commitment that it will be built. Stadium upgrades are being discussed, but they have not come up with a final plan. Gladchuk had all of this scheduled to be built back in the 90's when the cost would have been significantly less. Leahy opposed the facilities calling athletics a distraction to the mission of BC.
RECRUITS WANT THE BEST. Stanford just got a 4 star WR. They don't need to fill their stadium to get recruiting dividends.
The Stanford 4-star receiver picked Stanford IRREGARDLESS of their facilities. They could be holding practices in the O.co parking lot and this could would've picked Stanford. And good for him... he'll be your boss one day.
The rest of the post is not worthy of comment... especially the fiction about Gladchuck and Leahy having any sort of working relationship in the 5-seconds between Leahy's arrival and the gambling scandal.
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:BC is the cheapest outfit in the ACC. SA has made it clear to Leahy that an indoor building and major upgrades to the stadium are needed to stay competitive. The cost estimate for the indoor field is 40 million and SA received a commitment that it will be built. Stadium upgrades are being discussed, but they have not come up with a final plan. Gladchuk had all of this scheduled to be built back in the 90's when the cost would have been significantly less. Leahy opposed the facilities calling athletics a distraction to the mission of BC.
RECRUITS WANT THE BEST. Stanford just got a 4 star WR. They don't need to fill their stadium to get recruiting dividends.
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:BC is the cheapest outfit in the ACC. SA has made it clear to Leahy that an indoor building and major upgrades to the stadium are needed to stay competitive. The cost estimate for the indoor field is 40 million and SA received a commitment that it will be built. Stadium upgrades are being discussed, but they have not come up with a final plan. Gladchuk had all of this scheduled to be built back in the 90's when the cost would have been significantly less. Leahy opposed the facilities calling athletics a distraction to the mission of BC.
RECRUITS WANT THE BEST. Stanford just got a 4 star WR. They don't need to fill their stadium to get recruiting dividends.
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:BC is the cheapest outfit in the ACC. SA has made it clear to Leahy that an indoor building and major upgrades to the stadium are needed to stay competitive. The cost estimate for the indoor field is 40 million and SA received a commitment that it will be built. Stadium upgrades are being discussed, but they have not come up with a final plan. Gladchuk had all of this scheduled to be built back in the 90's when the cost would have been significantly less. Leahy opposed the facilities calling athletics a distraction to the mission of BC.
RECRUITS WANT THE BEST. Stanford just got a 4 star WR. They don't need to fill their stadium to get recruiting dividends.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:BC is the cheapest outfit in the ACC. SA has made it clear to Leahy that an indoor building and major upgrades to the stadium are needed to stay competitive. The cost estimate for the indoor field is 40 million and SA received a commitment that it will be built. Stadium upgrades are being discussed, but they have not come up with a final plan. Gladchuk had all of this scheduled to be built back in the 90's when the cost would have been significantly less. Leahy opposed the facilities calling athletics a distraction to the mission of BC.
RECRUITS WANT THE BEST. Stanford just got a 4 star WR. They don't need to fill their stadium to get recruiting dividends.
I'll bite, what are the stadium upgrades that SA thinks we need?
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:BC is the cheapest outfit in the ACC. SA has made it clear to Leahy that an indoor building and major upgrades to the stadium are needed to stay competitive. The cost estimate for the indoor field is 40 million and SA received a commitment that it will be built. Stadium upgrades are being discussed, but they have not come up with a final plan. Gladchuk had all of this scheduled to be built back in the 90's when the cost would have been significantly less. Leahy opposed the facilities calling athletics a distraction to the mission of BC.
RECRUITS WANT THE BEST. Stanford just got a 4 star WR. They don't need to fill their stadium to get recruiting dividends.
I'll bite, what are the stadium upgrades that SA thinks we need?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 181 guests