Page 2 of 8

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:19 am
by 31southst
commavegarage {l Wrote}:Without the coward, I bet we win (and we should expect to win) 3 of 4.


We should absolutely expect to win 3 and I think it'd be a huge disappointment if we don't.

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:34 am
by claver2010
Home and away ACC opponents will be announced today

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:05 am
by Walsh601
2013 non-division ACC opponents: FSU (UM, Pitt), Clem (GT, Va), NCSt (UNC, Duke), Md (Va, VT ), SU (Pitt, GT ), WF (Duke, UM), BC (VT, UNC)


https://twitter.com/McMurphyESPN/status/289763768790036482

So for 2013:

at Clemson
Florida State
at Maryland
NC State
at Syracuse
Wake Forest
Virginia Tech
at North Carolina

Full ACC grid: http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/acc/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/2013-14/misc_non_event/ACCFB13-opponents.pdf

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:06 am
by 31southst
VT repeats as a home game

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:11 am
by cvilleagle
Walsh601 {l Wrote}:
2013 non-division ACC opponents: FSU (UM, Pitt), Clem (GT, Va), NCSt (UNC, Duke), Md (Va, VT ), SU (Pitt, GT ), WF (Duke, UM), BC (VT, UNC)


https://twitter.com/McMurphyESPN/status/289763768790036482

So for 2013:

at Clemson
Florida State
at Maryland
NC State
at Syracuse
Wake Forest
Virginia Tech
at North Carolina

Full ACC grid: http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/acc/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/2013-14/misc_non_event/ACCFB13-opponents.pdf


Pretty good home schedule and we should be able to win some games. Expect at least 4-5 or I am very worried about the Daz.

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:23 am
by 31southst
Overall schedule:

Home
Stony Brook
Army
NM St
FSU
NC State
WF
VT

Away
USC
Clemson
Maryland
Cuse
UNC

Without thinking about this at all, this reinforces my thought that a bowl game is a very reasonable goal. If Daz is a decent hire or better(and I don't particularly think he is, but I'll give him the benefit for now), I think it's fair to categorize the games as follows:

Should win: Stony Brook, Army, NM State
Winnable: NC State, WF, VT, Maryland, Cuse
Unlikely: FSU, USC, Clemson, UNC

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:27 am
by bignick33
Is 9/14 for USC 100% confirmed?

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:28 am
by cvilleagle
31southst {l Wrote}:Overall schedule:

Home
Stony Brook
Army
NM St
FSU
NC State
WF
VT

Away
USC
Clemson
Maryland
Cuse
UNC

Without thinking about this at all, this reinforces my thought that a bowl game is a very reasonable goal. If Daz is a decent hire or better(and I don't particularly think he is, but I'll give him the benefit for now), I think it's fair to categorize the games as follows:

Should win: Stony Brook, Army, NM State
Winnable: NC State, WF, VT, Maryland, Cuse
Unlikely: FSU, USC, Clemson, UNC


Yeah, I have always said that our schedule is generally so easy that any decent coach makes a bowl game every single year. Winning less than six requires a huge amount of idiocy, which is why even Spaz made a couple bowls.

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:37 am
by pick6pedro
bignick33 {l Wrote}:Is 9/14 for USC 100% confirmed?


yes, donkey cap

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:38 am
by 31southst
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}:Is 9/14 for USC 100% confirmed?


yes, donkey cap


http://www.foxsportswest.com/01/10/13/USCs-2013-football-schedule-released-/landing.html?blockID=847737&feedID=3707

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:43 am
by DomingoOrtiz
Each ACC team will play eight conference games in football (four home and four away), six games within their division (three home, three away) and two games (one home, one away) with crossover opponents from the opposite division.


Did they drop the fake rivalry game?

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:49 am
by pick6pedro
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:
Each ACC team will play eight conference games in football (four home and four away), six games within their division (three home, three away) and two games (one home, one away) with crossover opponents from the opposite division.


Did they drop the fake rivalry game?


They did not. In that grid the "primary crossover" games are all the same "rivalry" matchups (plus Cuse-Pitt) as before. I think it's set to continue, meaning a team plays every other non-division opponent at home once every like 34 years.

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:54 am
by DomingoOrtiz
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:
Each ACC team will play eight conference games in football (four home and four away), six games within their division (three home, three away) and two games (one home, one away) with crossover opponents from the opposite division.


Did they drop the fake rivalry game?


They did not. In that grid the "primary crossover" games are all the same "rivalry" matchups (plus Cuse-Pitt) as before. I think it's set to continue, meaning a team plays every other non-division opponent at home once every like 34 years.



That sucks. Hopefully changes will be made when Louisville replaces Maryland.

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:06 pm
by claver2010
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:. I think it's set to continue, meaning a team plays every other non-division opponent at home once every like 34 years.


Yeah this is the shitty part. Won't be seeing Miami for a while

The shuffling of VT helps what would've been a miserable home schedule

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:10 pm
by eagle216
The only reason for that is to keep as many Tabacco Road games as possible, without putting all such donkey programs in one division, and so that they can keep Miami and FSU separate, because Miami is teh super awesome and we want to preserve the annual FSU-Miami ACCCG that occurs every year and garners huge ratings.

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:28 pm
by UnionvilleUConnFan
To all my dear friends here at EO, you will be happy to know that on a go forward basis I will be rooting for BC to defeat the following new and old, future and departing ACC programs:

Maryland
Notre Dame
Pittsburgh
Syracuse
Texas
UMass

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:30 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
how would you root against them... do you get access to espn3 in pedo jail?

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:12 pm
by HJS
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:
Each ACC team will play eight conference games in football (four home and four away), six games within their division (three home, three away) and two games (one home, one away) with crossover opponents from the opposite division.


Did they drop the fake rivalry game?


They did not. In that grid the "primary crossover" games are all the same "rivalry" matchups (plus Cuse-Pitt) as before. I think it's set to continue, meaning a team plays every other non-division opponent at home once every like 34 years.



That sucks. Hopefully changes will be made when Louisville replaces Maryland.

I thought that the idiots in Greensboro had already decided that Louisville would just slot in where Maryland was. Meaning they are strengthening the already much tougher Atlantic and will force UVA to play them in a fake rivalry game.

What's stupid is that it would make so much more sense to put Pitt in the Atlantic (so we and Cuse could play them) and have UL crossover be Pitt and UVA's be Cuse.

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:02 pm
by claver2010
Louisville is sliding in for Maryland, the division is going to be difficult

I'd just do away w the stupid rivalry games

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:58 pm
by mezmrin
rumor out of tClemson is that the ACC is in current discussions with all the member schools to realign the divisions into a north/south starting in 2015 or later. no word as to how well it's being received by all, but it is definitely in discussion at the moment. :duchE

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:04 pm
by MF73-Eleazar
mezmrin {l Wrote}:rumor out of tClemson is that the ACC is in current discussions with all the member schools to realign the divisions into a north/south starting in 2015 or later. no word as to how well it's being received by all, but it is definitely in discussion at the moment. :duchE


That would be awesome. Would the northern teams be placed in the "Sheman Division"?

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:11 pm
by cvilleagle
MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:
mezmrin {l Wrote}:rumor out of tClemson is that the ACC is in current discussions with all the member schools to realign the divisions into a north/south starting in 2015 or later. no word as to how well it's being received by all, but it is definitely in discussion at the moment. :duchE


That would be awesome. Would the northern teams be placed in the "Sheman Division"?


I think t he "She-man division" is more for members of this board.

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:24 pm
by TontoKowalski
I don't know what's funnier, the She Man division or the Sherman division. All I know is, the SheMan division scoreboards should flash random images from Transitive * stories or the Photoshop HOF thread after touchdowns. Anytime a home team loses, the scoreboard must show Yogurt Man for a week.

Also... the first thing I thought of re: opening against Stony Brook was Ginger O'Jortsihan's career opener against Temple. Anyone else think Spazzle Dazzle will open with a loud and explosive turd in his regiment tightie whities? Also, will Dazzle be mic'ing directly into the player's ears? If so, will the players have to put in firing-range earplugs? Won't the opposing defense hear the calls? Won't I hear the calls on tv?

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:06 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
since its stony brook i think lonely jizz shots would be more appropriate than explosive turds...

Image

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:46 pm
by claver2010
So according to the heights editor, the nm st game is on the road? WTF?

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:00 pm
by eepstein0
claver2010 {l Wrote}:So according to the heights editor, the nm st game is on the road? WTF?


There's no way we're playing @ NMST

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:12 pm
by hansen
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:So according to the heights editor, the nm st game is on the road? WTF?


There's no way we're playing @ NMST

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:28 pm
by claver2010
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:So according to the heights editor, the nm st game is on the road? WTF?


There's no way we're playing @ NMST


Football source confirms: http://www.bcheightssports.com/2013/01/ ... c-in-2013/

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:29 pm
by Walsh601
The Boston College football team will play six away games in 2013, as its matchup with New Mexico State will be played at Aggie Memorial Stadium. The Eagles are scheduled to travel out to Las Cruces, N.M. on the weekend of Nov. 9 to play the non-conference game, a BC source has confirmed to The Heights.

This gives BC two separate west-coast trips during the 2013 season, as it also plays at Southern California on Sept. 14. Additionally, new head coach Steve Addazio will lead his team to away games at Clemson, Maryland, Syracuse, and North Carolina.

The six games to be played at Alumni Stadium are against Stony Brook, Army, Florida State, North Carolina State, Wake Forest, and Virginia Tech.


http://www.bcheightssports.com/2013/01/26/six-away-games-for-bc-in-2013/

Between Addazio and this, not a good start for Master Bates.

Re: 2013 Schedule

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:54 pm
by eepstein0
Walsh601 {l Wrote}:
The Boston College football team will play six away games in 2013, as its matchup with New Mexico State will be played at Aggie Memorial Stadium. The Eagles are scheduled to travel out to Las Cruces, N.M. on the weekend of Nov. 9 to play the non-conference game, a BC source has confirmed to The Heights.

This gives BC two separate west-coast trips during the 2013 season, as it also plays at Southern California on Sept. 14. Additionally, new head coach Steve Addazio will lead his team to away games at Clemson, Maryland, Syracuse, and North Carolina.

The six games to be played at Alumni Stadium are against Stony Brook, Army, Florida State, North Carolina State, Wake Forest, and Virginia Tech.


http://www.bcheightssports.com/2013/01/26/six-away-games-for-bc-in-2013/

Between Addazio and this, not a good start for Master Bates.


This should be a fireable offense for Bates.