Realistic seasonal expectations....

Forum rules
"The opinions expressed on this board are property of the poster and do not reflect the opinion of EagleOutsider, Boston College or Boston College Athletics"

Victories over? Choose up to 3 options

Poll ended at Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:13 pm

BC beats Maine & Army
8
19%
BC beats Maine, Army, & Maryland
7
16%
BC beats Maine, Army, & Wake Forest
5
12%
BC beats Maine, Army, & NC State
1
2%
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland & NC State
1
2%
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland & Wake Forest
3
7%
BC beats Maine, Army, NC State & Wake Forest
0
No votes
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland, NC State & Wake Forest
3
7%
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland, NC State & Wake Forest
0
No votes
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland, NC State, Wake Forest & Miami
4
9%
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland, NC State, Wake Forest & Northwestern
3
7%
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland, NC State, Wake Forest, Miami & Northwestern
3
7%
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland, NC State, Wake Forest, Miami & Notre Dame
2
5%
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland, NC State, Wake Forest, Northwestern & Notre Dame
0
No votes
BC beats Maine, Army, Maryland, NC State, Wake Forest, Northwestern, Miami & Notre Dame
3
7%
 
Total votes : 43

Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby innocentbystander on Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:13 pm

Bowl game aside. I know I don't have every possible combination, but I got some of them. I'd like some serious guesses as to where you see the season, and I refuse to consider any other options that don't include wins over Maine and Army.
- your entire life, as near as you frame it here, is a shameless, flabby-wristed asthmatic land-grab for as much quantity as you can get for as little expense as possible.

Image
User avatar
innocentbystander
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 13179
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pac-12 Hell
Karma: -397

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby hansen on Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:21 pm

10-2
HANSENPOST

Image
User avatar
hansen
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 8417
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:07 pm
Location: On location at Ped State
Karma: -19

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby Bumpers on Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:23 pm

Here are my seasonal predictions:

Weatherwise, I rather expect the spring to continue to be unusually warm, though wetter than normal, the summer to be blistering (to dry up all that extra moisture!), the fall to be very placid, stiking boredome to the very core of my soul moving me to go apple picking on Saturdays with nothing better to do, and the winter to be long and cold, colder than last year, anyways.

As for allergies, I think the mold allergies will ebb well into the summer given the lack of any real winter freeze and the gentle and wet spring. Hopefully the blistering summer will dry that up by the middle of August. Pollen won't be too bad, though. Look out for the Hay Fever, though! The fall will give way to an early freeze this year, so relief is in sight!

Duck hunting looks fair to midland if you are using shot as opposed to ball, but dress accordingly, and bring your Flonase as indicated above.

The deer will be out on force, so ENJOY there!
User avatar
Bumpers
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: 1060 W. Addison
Karma: 77

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby innocentbystander on Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:24 pm

Bumpers wrote:Here are my seasonal predictions:

Weatherwise, I rather expect the spring to continue to be unusually warm, though wetter than normal, the summer to be blistering (to dry up all that extra moisture!), the fall to be very placid, stiking boredome to the very core of my soul moving me to go apple picking on Saturdays with nothing better to do, and the winter to be long and cold, colder than last year, anyways.

As for allergies, I think the mold allergies will ebb well into the summer given the lack of any real winter freeze and the gentle and wet spring. Hopefully the blistering summer will dry that up by the middle of August. Pollen won't be too bad, though. Look out for the Hay Fever, though! The fall will give way to an early freeze this year, so relief is in sight!

Duck hunting looks fair to midland if you are using shot as opposed to ball, but dress accordingly, and bring your Flonase as indicated above.

The deer will be out on force, so ENJOY there!


its apple picking time
- your entire life, as near as you frame it here, is a shameless, flabby-wristed asthmatic land-grab for as much quantity as you can get for as little expense as possible.

Image
User avatar
innocentbystander
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 13179
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pac-12 Hell
Karma: -397

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby historylesson on Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:33 pm

Based on last year's results, the losses from that team and lack of additions to replace them I think you are awfully presumptuous to assume victories over Maine and Army.

I would predict you lose to one of those teams.
historylesson
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:11 am
Karma: -33

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby pick6pedro on Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:38 pm

Are the players a year older? Do they know how to win? 13-0.

Wait, no Rich Gunnell? 1-11.
User avatar
pick6pedro
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:25 pm
Location: A Chalupa Stand
Karma: 2203

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby innocentbystander on Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:56 pm

historylesson wrote:Based on last year's results, the losses from that team and lack of additions to replace them....


Let me clue you in on something.

Not counting kickers, F$U has more returning starters than any team in the ACC at 18. They are stacked. They are thinking beyond the Orange Bowl. Much to their chagrin they wont be BCS bowling, but they are stacked.

BC returns 17. I think the staff can replace 5. (By the by, my pick for the first ACC team to play in the MNC since BC joined it, returns 16.)

I have no memory of any BC football team in the entire history of BC football, where so many of the players who will be starting this year were starters last year. If 17 returning starters (10 of which are on offense) is a rebuilding year, then every fucking year is a rebuilding year with :spaz2
- your entire life, as near as you frame it here, is a shameless, flabby-wristed asthmatic land-grab for as much quantity as you can get for as little expense as possible.

Image
User avatar
innocentbystander
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 13179
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pac-12 Hell
Karma: -397

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:23 pm

Unfortunately, I think the defense will suffer some injuries and the OLine will not be improved. I am still an optimist = 5-7
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 15509
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 1127

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby historylesson on Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:48 pm

innocentbystander wrote:
historylesson wrote:Based on last year's results, the losses from that team and lack of additions to replace them....


Let me clue you in on something.

Not counting kickers, F$U has more returning starters than any team in the ACC at 18. They are stacked. They are thinking beyond the Orange Bowl. Much to their chagrin they wont be BCS bowling, but they are stacked.

BC returns 17. I think the staff can replace 5. (By the by, my pick for the first ACC team to play in the MNC since BC joined it, returns 16.)

I have no memory of any BC football team in the entire history of BC football, where so many of the players who will be starting this year were starters last year. If 17 returning starters (10 of which are on offense) is a rebuilding year, then every fucking year is a rebuilding year with :spaz2


So the starters in the secondary that sucked but are coming back is a good thing. Got it, you're full on retard.
historylesson
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:11 am
Karma: -33

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby innocentbystander on Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:48 pm

twballgame9 wrote:Unfortunately, I think the defense will suffer some injuries and the OLine will not be improved. I am still an optimist = 5-7


i am also cautiously optomistic. i'm a BC fan, so I suppose I am tapping into that fanaticism to the point of being irrational. everything depends on the first 3 games. Going 3-0 means (to me) 6-6 at the very worst. Go 1-2, and at best 5-7 and :spaz2 fires another offensive coordinator

I think they lose at Northwestern but hold serve at home. 2-1 turns into 6-6.
- your entire life, as near as you frame it here, is a shameless, flabby-wristed asthmatic land-grab for as much quantity as you can get for as little expense as possible.

Image
User avatar
innocentbystander
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 13179
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pac-12 Hell
Karma: -397

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby EagleDave on Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:11 pm

I think IB is trying to singlehandedly jump start 10-2 season again.
Is this the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
EagleDave
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Karma: 282

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby innocentbystander on Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:15 pm

EagleDave wrote:I think IB is trying to singlehandedly jump start 10-2 season again.


if I thought for a second that there was a chance (even a slim chance) at 10-2, I would say 10-2.

I'm saying 6-6. from where we have fallen, that IS optomism
- your entire life, as near as you frame it here, is a shameless, flabby-wristed asthmatic land-grab for as much quantity as you can get for as little expense as possible.

Image
User avatar
innocentbystander
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 13179
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pac-12 Hell
Karma: -397

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby innocentbystander on Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:02 pm

historylesson wrote:
innocentbystander wrote:
historylesson wrote:Based on last year's results, the losses from that team and lack of additions to replace them....


Let me clue you in on something.

Not counting kickers, F$U has more returning starters than any team in the ACC at 18. They are stacked. They are thinking beyond the Orange Bowl. Much to their chagrin they wont be BCS bowling, but they are stacked.

BC returns 17. I think the staff can replace 5. (By the by, my pick for the first ACC team to play in the MNC since BC joined it, returns 16.)

I have no memory of any BC football team in the entire history of BC football, where so many of the players who will be starting this year were starters last year. If 17 returning starters (10 of which are on offense) is a rebuilding year, then every fucking year is a rebuilding year with :spaz2


So the starters in the secondary that sucked but are coming back is a good thing. Got it, you're full on retard.


Got it, you're fully in the bozo filter.
- your entire life, as near as you frame it here, is a shameless, flabby-wristed asthmatic land-grab for as much quantity as you can get for as little expense as possible.

Image
User avatar
innocentbystander
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 13179
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pac-12 Hell
Karma: -397

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby apbc12 on Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:45 pm

innocentbystander wrote:
EagleDave wrote:I think IB is trying to singlehandedly jump start 10-2 season again.


if I thought for a second that there was a chance (even a slim chance) at 10-2, I would say 10-2.

I'm saying 6-6. from where we have fallen, that IS optomism


I think the word you're looking for is "optometry."
Image
User avatar
apbc12
Higgins Hall
 
Posts: 4547
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:31 pm
Karma: 1750

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby NJM89 on Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:25 pm

They will go 7-5 which sucks because spaz is a bitch and I don't want him near this program if he comes back after making it to a (toilet)bowl game
Image
User avatar
NJM89
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 847
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:18 pm
Karma: 40

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby hansen on Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:05 pm

the lack of depth on this team is scary especially in the secondary... i'll say 4-8 although this team is one injury away from 2-10
HANSENPOST

Image
User avatar
hansen
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 8417
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:07 pm
Location: On location at Ped State
Karma: -19

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby TontoKowalski on Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:11 pm

3-9. I really think it'll be 2-10, but I'm usually too pessimistic by one game. Don't ask who we'll beat because it doesn't matter. Spaz has run out of players who were coached by people other than him, and the full suckitude of his coaching will, sadly, be on display in every phase of the game.
User avatar
TontoKowalski
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:20 pm
Karma: 898

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby tailgater94 on Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:36 am

It doesn't matter who the players are, it matters who the coach is. And our coach has gone

YEAR W L T PCT PF PA
2011 4 8 0 0.333 218 282
2010 7 6 0 0.538 240 254
2009 8 5 0 0.615 322 257

I think its more reasonable to expect the downward trend to not just continue, but to accelerate. So 2-10 seems like a realistic expectation. We lost to Duke at home last year, so we could lose to pretty much anyone.

FIRE SPAZ
:titanic
tailgater94
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:33 pm
Karma: 39

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby rktbrkr on Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:48 am

Likely wins in order of likeliness:MA,MD and Army.

Should get past MA without depth problems at RB,DL and DB affecting results but from depth problems could lead to real embarassment on the field. If OL doesn't improve Rettig will get hurt and it will be impossible wto watch games after that. Bordner is a 1 trick pony and everybody has seen the trick now.
rktbrkr
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:28 am
Karma: -72

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby mod6A on Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:16 pm

6 and 6 is the new 10 and 2.

this is going to be the worst potato season in a long time.
we are all whalepants now
User avatar
mod6A
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1180
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:09 am
Karma: 155

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby innocentbystander on Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:08 pm

mod6A wrote:6 and 6 is the new 10 and 2.

this is going to be the worst potato season in a long time.


apples
- your entire life, as near as you frame it here, is a shameless, flabby-wristed asthmatic land-grab for as much quantity as you can get for as little expense as possible.

Image
User avatar
innocentbystander
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 13179
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pac-12 Hell
Karma: -397

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby MaxxPower325 on Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:25 am

hansen wrote:the lack of depth on this team is scary especially in the secondary... i'll say 4-8 although this team is one injury away from 2-10


I'm on board with this, though if they manage to beat Miami it might actually jump to 6-6...
MaxxPower325
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:48 am
Karma: 63

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby cvilleagle on Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:34 am

MaxxPower325 wrote:
hansen wrote:the lack of depth on this team is scary especially in the secondary... i'll say 4-8 although this team is one injury away from 2-10


I'm on board with this, though if they manage to beat Miami it might actually jump to 6-6...

A miracle 6-6 finish with a shitty bowl game is absolutely the worst thing that could happen to this program this year. This is the nightmare.
Image
User avatar
cvilleagle
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 6600
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:14 pm
Karma: 1154

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby claver2010 on Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:40 am

Agreed, 6-6 would give :pickle the excuse to bring back :spaz might as well bottom out, suffer for the next 5 months and focus on the next HC search where hopefully gene has zero say
Frank Spaziani will lead us to the Orange Bowl within the next three years - :pickle 11/11/10

“We stress trophies at BC. We talk a lot about them. That’s your legacy." - York 3/17/12
User avatar
claver2010
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 11616
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 1063

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby DavidGordonsFoot on Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:57 am

Bumpers wrote:As for allergies, I think the mold allergies will ebb well into the summer given the lack of any real winter freeze and the gentle and wet spring.


I miss campion's prednisone-induced mania during mold allergy season.
wash balls million
User avatar
DavidGordonsFoot
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 7514
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:56 pm
Location: Not tobaccoroad
Karma: 1312

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby BCdee on Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:41 pm

pick6pedro wrote:Are the players a year older? Do they know how to win? 13-0.

Wait, no Rich Gunnell? 1-11.


This made me laugh! :)

Why does IB have a that pic as his signature? Gross.
Image
User avatar
BCdee
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2097
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:07 am
Location: SC
Karma: 325

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby DavidGordonsFoot on Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:49 pm

BCdee wrote:
Why does IB have a that pic as his signature? Gross.


He lost a bet to angrychicken on the NBA Playoffs. The thread is on MA's.
wash balls million
User avatar
DavidGordonsFoot
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 7514
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:56 pm
Location: Not tobaccoroad
Karma: 1312

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby 0J1969 on Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:50 pm

BCdee wrote:Why does IB have a that pic as his signature? Gross.


I assumed that he finally admitted his molestation with his psychologist and is acting on the advice given as a result of that admission. He's finally embracing what God made him.
0J1969
n00b
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:28 pm
Karma: 77

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby innocentbystander on Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:01 pm

BCdee wrote:
pick6pedro wrote:Are the players a year older? Do they know how to win? 13-0.

Wait, no Rich Gunnell? 1-11.


This made me laugh! :)

Why does IB have a that pic as his signature? Gross.


paying off on a bet

blame the :angrychicken
- your entire life, as near as you frame it here, is a shameless, flabby-wristed asthmatic land-grab for as much quantity as you can get for as little expense as possible.

Image
User avatar
innocentbystander
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 13179
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pac-12 Hell
Karma: -397

Re: Realistic seasonal expectations....

Postby angrychicken on Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:11 pm

BCdee wrote:
Why does IB have a that pic as his signature? Gross.

Seriously. What a weirdo.
User avatar
angrychicken
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:39 pm
Karma: 13403

Next

Return to Alumni Stadium

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests

Untitled document