










bignick33 wrote:Pete Thamel is reporting that the plan for Joe Pa to step down is already in motion. Take that twatwaffle helper.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/sport ... ml?_r=1&hp


weinerdog wrote:bignick33 wrote:Pete Thamel is reporting that the plan for Joe Pa to step down is already in motion. Take that twatwaffle helper.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/sport ... ml?_r=1&hp
So he'll be available? Cuz he's undeniably better than anyone BC's got on staff. I'd hire him in a second.



bignick33 wrote:eagle9903 wrote:bignick33 wrote:eagle9903 wrote:bignick33 wrote:2001Eagle wrote:bignick33 wrote:PSU has called off this week's news conference.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sto ... conference
Smart move. Putting that senile old coot up there would have been akin to allowing Paterno to be questioned without a lawyer. People are out for blood on this one.
But it also makes them look like they're dodging (which they are). Regardless, they're everyone is done-zo regardless of how they handle it.
This certainly should be the case. I think the PA AG's office's decision not to prosecute Paterno is probably at least somewhat politically related and I wouldn't be surprised at any lengths the school which covered up 10 year old boy rape for 13 years will go to stop the hemorrhaging around his legacy. Curley, Schultz, McQueary and Spanier will definitely be destroyed(as they should be). I'm not confident as to JoePa as of yet.
I think you're being silly. The outcry will flow all the way up to Corbett if Joe Pa is protected. And even if the "won't somebody think of the children" (applied literally, sadly) segment doesn't get their way, which they will, the suddenly powerful "Joe Pa's time has passed" will circle like vultures.
That's the problem as I see it. Corbett was the AG before being elected governor. I'd imagine he was consulted about such a high profile issue when the determination was made to proceed with charges(I think the GJ report is a close enough call for some executive discretion). I think it's in his best interest to avoid going after JoePa unless and until local(there are a disturbing amount of idiots involved) public opinion forces otherwise and I think we're already seeing that the school will sacrifice virtually anything to keep the tatters of the legacy intact.
I'm not saying I think he'll stay as HC. I just think they will continue make every effort at damage control indefinitely. I fully expect Spanier to fall on his sword any hour now.
This thing is not going away, and soon everyone in a position of power will realize how big it is, if they haven't already. Corbett will go down if Joe Pa remains the head coach at PSU.
Besides, for your theory about the continued (sort of) cover-up to be accurate, you're assuming that Joe Pa committed a currently prosecutable crime, correct? Do you think Teddy is wrong (you're a lawyer too, right?)? Perhaps the simple reason that Joe Pa wasn't indicted was because there was nothing to indict him for. Think about it...indicting Joe Pa on empty charges would be putting one's political neck out there as well.























bignick33 wrote:In response to eagle9903, i don't think an end result of merely sending the old man away to a nursing home is that great of an injustice. In terms of legacy, any idiot will see that scandal directly led to resignation.












eagle9903 wrote:bignick33 wrote:In response to eagle9903, i don't think an end result of merely sending the old man away to a nursing home is that great of an injustice. In terms of legacy, any idiot will see that scandal directly led to resignation.
you think highly of idiots.












bignick33 wrote:eagle9903 wrote:bignick33 wrote:In response to eagle9903, i don't think an end result of merely sending the old man away to a nursing home is that great of an injustice. In terms of legacy, any idiot will see that scandal directly led to resignation.
you think highly of idiots.
I don't personally know Artie from kenzo.












SiValEagle wrote:I'm glad this didn't happen at BC or Notre Dame.







It seems JoPa complied with the letter of the law but the whole thing is too hot to handle
















bignick33 wrote:9903, the timing that it occurred during the bye week immediately following passing Robinson (a fact that I have inexplicably not even considered until moments ago) does strongly support your theory that whoever is pulling the strings here is concerned about Joe's legacy. I still believe that the chronology of it--1) indictments come down that implicate Joe morally, 2) Joe resigns shortly thereafter--are pretty damning to his legacy.













TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:BCFAN94 wrote:Paterno reported it, I think he is covered legally according to the grand jury report, it is up to the "person in charge of the school or institution" to report to the authorities after being informed by a staff member.
are you sure? if this fact pattern were true i would expect someone else in this thread would have mentioned it
"out of my way, i got here late"






eagle9903 wrote:bignick33 wrote:9903, the timing that it occurred during the bye week immediately following passing Robinson (a fact that I have inexplicably not even considered until moments ago) does strongly support your theory that whoever is pulling the strings here is concerned about Joe's legacy. I still believe that the chronology of it--1) indictments come down that implicate Joe morally, 2) Joe resigns shortly thereafter--are pretty damning to his legacy.
Anyone 1/20th capable of reading between the lines will now he was at least morally culpable, and I'm very surprised by the stepping down already, so I may be very, very wrong here. I was foreseeing, based on some of the people on the radio here, or friends who went to PSU(who kept inexplicably saying "wait until everything comes out to judge") that this would be Calhoun and the Nate Miles thing times eleventybillion. Where anyone with a brain knows the legendary coach was front a center, but the official line remains plausbible deniability forever.











NorthEndEagle wrote:That donkey had character issues.










TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:BCFAN94 wrote:TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:BCFAN94 wrote:Paterno reported it, I think he is covered legally according to the grand jury report, it is up to the "person in charge of the school or institution" to report to the authorities after being informed by a staff member.
are you sure? if this fact pattern were true i would expect someone else in this thread would have mentioned it
"out of my way, i got here late"
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/feature?section=news&id=8421115
See page 11-12
Now, I am not and SCJ like some on this board but that how it looks to me.
my point was that your point was first raised on page 1 of this thread and then discussed for an additional 4 pages
i.e. -














b0mberMan wrote:"Scott Paterno, Joe's son, is working on setting up an off-campus press conference for Paterno to speak at."
"Scott Paterno says his father is "not stepping down" and will be on the sidelines this weekend. They'll fight this one to the end."
Two tweets from a local reporter who covers PSU:
http://twitter.com/#!/Ben_Jones88












Lawyers win round 1. RT @PeteThamelNYT: Was just told that Joe Paterno will NOT be holding a press conference outside the school.























RegalBCeagle wrote:ryrob wrote:RegalBCeagle wrote:ryrob wrote:DomingoOrtiz wrote:I don't know if there is anything about the DA in this thread, but wow did this get interesting:
"That said, police revealed that Gricar's home computer had saved searches for "how to wreck a hard drive" and "water damage to a notebook computer," meaning that he clearly wanted to make sure something never saw the light of day."
Also, the AD Gricar has been missing and presumed dead since the late 90s. Maybe it gets worse?
So wait, now you think there's actually something to all of this? Maybe? Tool.
![]()
Stick to pedophilia jokes.
Stick to negging my karma, as if that actually means anything. You're a complete and utter tool, and in the beginning of this thread you were, by default, defending some of the participants in this whole thing. Something tells me you're either a closet homosexual or that you've dabbled in checking out kiddie porn on you computer. Either way, you're always going to be a fucking tool.






Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests