innocentbystander {l Wrote}:We are never going to get a Saban. Forget it.
Given the track record that THE BEST coaches that coach football at BC instantly bolt for greener pastures (both figuratively, athletically, and financially) the very moment they are able to do so (BC contract be d-mned) it is foolish to even consider that BC has anyway of keeping the best ones here. If we go cheap, roll the dice with a young unproven guy, get lucky as he turns out to be both a stellar recruiter AND a somewhat decent game day coach, he'll be gone faster than Urban Meyer left Utah. In the blink of an eye, gone (or try to leave, ala Jags.) Which is very frustrating. There can be no continuity with anyone halfway decent.
Coaching football at BC is either a resume builder (TOBy, Tom Coughlin, Don Brown, Leahy, Holovak, etc) OR a career ender (Bicknell, Spaz, Henning, probably Daz.) Nothing in-between. Even Jags may have ended his career here.
So I think we need to focus on someone young who has a personal connection to the school (someone emotionally tied to BC), sign him to a very short contract (2 or 3 years), see if he can both recruit AND game day coach. If he can't, let the contract run out. If he can, sign him for 10+ years with MAJOR financial penalties on his part if he departs. And maybe he'll agree to that because he has a personal connection to the success of the school. We have to try something new... think differently. Or else, the best we can hope for is another TOBy (great recruiter but very disgruntled, unhappy coach, who thinks he can do so much better than BC.) The worst, we are going to just get another Dan Henaddaziani.
in the history of the internet, i am not sure there has ever been a poster worse than you. (congratulations, hansen).
so, what you are describing is that bc gets a coach that comes in and performs so successfully, he is attracted away to a better job. and you are saying that's a bad thing. because bc did well.
and then what might happen - bc would get a reputation for giving coaches a shot to do well and then find someplace "better" if they are successful at bc. wouldn't that be terrible, getting coaches that are actually hungry to succeed rather than just fall assbackwards into a job after a 4-7 season.
the worst part of all of this is that you might actually get a string of success by having a good coach, with good recruits leave and getting another good coach to replace him/her to potentially succeed with said good recruits.
all you pussy ass "we don't want a coach that is going to leave" cocksuckers are the reason we keep getting guys that have no chance at a head shot anywhere else and use us as a place that they can ride out their 5 year contract, making bank and stashing cash, before heading off to some other place that they still likely aren't qualified for but will get overpaid to do a bad job there too.
the next person that posts "we don't want coach x because he may leave for a better team after succeeding here" will have their post altered to include a picture of the gay sex that i assume that poster engages in