Penn State

by **JesuitIvy** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 4:07 pm

but by negging karma it puts him that much further from being able to redeem the points for a Shinskie jersey. there are implications!

by **DavidGordonsFoot** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 4:11 pm

BearTerritory {l Wrote}:Who does everyone like this weekend: Nebraska or Penn State?

Penn State. Win one for the Gipper.*

* - yes, that was sarcasm. I feel I need to clarify that in this emotionally charged thread.

by **bignick33** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 4:30 pm

It didn't take long for the feds to get involved:

http://meehan.house.gov/uploads/Meehan% ... Duncan.pdf

by **RegalBCeagle** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:00 pm

ryrob {l Wrote}:I have better things to do than "neg" your karma. Of course, in your world, no one else could possibly find you as stupid as I do. You're either 15, or you're 30 and you write like you're 15. Not sure which is worse.

If by "better things to do" you mean defending the indefensible, then have at it. You certainly changed your tune about the "hearsay" aspect of things when the GJ Testimony was printed and showed that Sandusky was anal raping and fellating young boys. You're either a member of NAMBLA, or you write like you want to be. Not sure which is worse.

by **twballgame9** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:09 pm

BCFAN94 {l Wrote}:Paterno reported it, I think he is covered legally according to the grand jury report, it is up to the "person in charge of the school or institution" to report to the authorities after being informed by a staff member.

Oh snap. Regal is going to be all over your ass for being a pedophile.

by **ryrob** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:09 pm

RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:
ryrob {l Wrote}:I have better things to do than "neg" your karma. Of course, in your world, no one else could possibly find you as stupid as I do. You're either 15, or you're 30 and you write like you're 15. Not sure which is worse.

If by "better things to do" you mean defending the indefensible, then have at it. You certainly changed your tune about the "hearsay" aspect of things when the GJ Testimony was printed and showed that Sandusky was anal raping and fellating young boys. You're either a member of NAMBLA, or you write like you want to be. Not sure which is worse.

Once again, missing the point and conflating arguments. Never change.

by **twballgame9** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:13 pm

RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:
ryrob {l Wrote}:I have better things to do than "neg" your karma. Of course, in your world, no one else could possibly find you as stupid as I do. You're either 15, or you're 30 and you write like you're 15. Not sure which is worse.

If by "better things to do" you mean defending the indefensible, then have at it. You certainly changed your tune about the "hearsay" aspect of things when the GJ Testimony was printed and showed that Sandusky was anal raping and fellating young boys. You're either a member of NAMBLA, or you write like you want to be. Not sure which is worse.

I think someone may have touched Regal at some point in time. If so, my apologies Regal, I didn't mean to be so insensitive by suggesting that JoePa didn't commit a crime and had no duty to report what he heard second hand. Shame on me.

by **MTeagleCPA** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:15 pm

Is "Negging my Karma" an Encino Man reference?

by **twballgame9** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:16 pm

MTeagleCPA {l Wrote}:Is "Negging my Karma" an Encino Man reference?

Is the Montana guy from EI? If so, welcome aboard, good poster.

by **MTeagleCPA** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:18 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
MTeagleCPA {l Wrote}:Is "Negging my Karma" an Encino Man reference?

Is the Montana guy from EI? If so, welcome aboard, good poster.

I was stuck in traffic.

by **angrychicken** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:49 pm

I always knew Paterno was a pedophile. Have you ever heard the guy talk?

by **BCFAN94** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:08 pm

Here is what is somewhat confusing about the whole thing. If this missing DA was involved and decided not to prosecute, wouldn't that mean that it was reported to the authorities?

by **RegalBCeagle** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:13 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:
ryrob {l Wrote}:I have better things to do than "neg" your karma. Of course, in your world, no one else could possibly find you as stupid as I do. You're either 15, or you're 30 and you write like you're 15. Not sure which is worse.

If by "better things to do" you mean defending the indefensible, then have at it. You certainly changed your tune about the "hearsay" aspect of things when the GJ Testimony was printed and showed that Sandusky was anal raping and fellating young boys. You're either a member of NAMBLA, or you write like you want to be. Not sure which is worse.

I think someone may have touched Regal at some point in time. If so, my apologies Regal, I didn't mean to be so insensitive by suggesting that JoePa didn't commit a crime and had no duty to report what he heard second hand. Shame on me.

Nice try on that one. I think a more realistic element to this is that you've been on their side of issue somewhere in your life. Perhaps you'll be googling how to destroy a hard drive in the near future as you doubt what may come of the site history you've been hitting up in recent time. I'm sorry if I find this shit at PSU repulsive and you think it's a legal case. I should remind you to think about things in terms of reality, and not some law text you need to write a legal brief on. This is the kind of disgusting behavior that drove me from Catholicism (I consider myself a Christian), and I believe those that perpetrated as well as those that enable abuse of children are the lowest scum on earth. It's really kind of sad that some, including yourself, are finding excuses for those involved. Keep up with your Expert Legal Spin on this case, and someday, if you find a woman that accepts you, maybe you'll have kids of your own. When one of them is sexually abused, and you come on here crying bloody murder, I'll be sure to point out that certain people that knew about the abuse but never reported it are innocent, and deserve no criticism. After all, it wasn't a legal requirement for them to do so. As long as you're OK with that, then I'll admit that you've been correct all along.

by **twballgame9** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:19 pm

BCFAN94 {l Wrote}:Here is what is somewhat confusing about the whole thing. If this missing DA was involved and decided not to prosecute, wouldn't that mean that it was reported to the authorities?

One of the kid's moms reported it back in 2002. Not PSU officials.

by **angrychicken** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:19 pm

I'm pretty sure that if I was told that a kid was getting buggered by an old man in the shower, I would at least call the cops. THAT'S JUST ME. :shrug

by **twballgame9** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:24 pm

RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:
ryrob {l Wrote}:I have better things to do than "neg" your karma. Of course, in your world, no one else could possibly find you as stupid as I do. You're either 15, or you're 30 and you write like you're 15. Not sure which is worse.

If by "better things to do" you mean defending the indefensible, then have at it. You certainly changed your tune about the "hearsay" aspect of things when the GJ Testimony was printed and showed that Sandusky was anal raping and fellating young boys. You're either a member of NAMBLA, or you write like you want to be. Not sure which is worse.

I think someone may have touched Regal at some point in time. If so, my apologies Regal, I didn't mean to be so insensitive by suggesting that JoePa didn't commit a crime and had no duty to report what he heard second hand. Shame on me.

Nice try on that one. I think a more realistic element to this is that you've been on their side of issue somewhere in your life. Perhaps you'll be googling how to destroy a hard drive in the near future as you doubt what may come of the site history you've been hitting up in recent time. I'm sorry if I find this shit at PSU repulsive and you think it's a legal case. I should remind you to think about things in terms of reality, and not some law text you need to write a legal brief on. This is the kind of disgusting behavior that drove me from Catholicism (I consider myself a Christian), and I believe those that perpetrated as well as those that enable abuse of children are the lowest scum on earth. It's really kind of sad that some, including yourself, are finding excuses for those involved. Keep up with your Expert Legal Spin on this case, and someday, if you find a woman that accepts you, maybe you'll have kids of your own. When one of them is sexually abused, and you come on here crying bloody murder, I'll be sure to point out that certain people that knew about the abuse but never reported it are innocent, and deserve no criticism. After all, it wasn't a legal requirement for them to do so. As long as you're OK with that, then I'll admit that you've been correct all along.

Newsflash: when people get arrested and indicted, it's a legal case.

I think the incident is horrible and they should all burn in hell. Everyone pretty much agrees, so it isn't very interesting. What is interesting is the retarded people that can't think about it rationally and start talking about the law, and then get pissed when lawyers correct them. If you had stuck with "this is horrible, I hope Kirby Puckett gets JoePa as a roomie" I wouldn't have commented on your post. When you fly off the handle about hearsay and legal consequences of a failure to report, you have invited the commentary on the blatantly relevant legal aspects of the incidents.

I can separate the two - the horrible immorality and the legal consequences. It is evident that you cannot. My apologies.

by **twballgame9** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:27 pm

angrychicken {l Wrote}:I'm pretty sure that if I was told that a kid was getting buggered by an old man in the shower, I would at least call the cops. THAT'S JUST ME.

And if the report you received turned out to be incorrect you'd be in deep shit.

by **bignick33** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:42 pm

angrychicken {l Wrote}:I'm pretty sure that if I was told that a kid was getting buggered by an old man in the shower, I would at least call the cops. THAT'S JUST ME.

If you didn't, you'd be McQueer.

by **eagle9903** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:36 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
angrychicken {l Wrote}:I'm pretty sure that if I was told that a kid was getting buggered by an old man in the shower, I would at least call the cops. THAT'S JUST ME.

And if the report you received turned out to be incorrect you'd be in deep shit.

Libel? or is there something in the reporting stuff?

by **MilitantEagle** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 8:02 pm

Joe Paterno not knowing where the car is in the "PSU's Joe Paterno speaks" video...

http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/08/justice/p ... ?hpt=hp_t2

by **pick6pedro** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 8:04 pm

by **2001Eagle** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 8:23 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
BCFAN94 {l Wrote}:Here is what is somewhat confusing about the whole thing. If this missing DA was involved and decided not to prosecute, wouldn't that mean that it was reported to the authorities?

One of the kid's moms reported it back in 2002. Not PSU officials.

In 1998, bro. Keep your eye on domingo's helpful timeline.

by **Mosi** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 8:25 pm

speaking of the Feds, question for the lawyers and those who play them on TV

isn't transporting a minor across state lines for the purpose of buggering the minor a federal crime???

by **angrychicken** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 8:45 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
angrychicken {l Wrote}:I'm pretty sure that if I was told that a kid was getting buggered by an old man in the shower, I would at least call the cops. THAT'S JUST ME.

And if the report you received turned out to be incorrect you'd be in deep shit.

Not if I called from someone else's phone and disguised my voice.

by **pick6pedro** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 8:55 pm

Mosi {l Wrote}:speaking of the Feds, question for the lawyers and those who play them on TV

isn't transporting a minor across state lines for the purpose of buggering the minor a federal crime???

Ah, the principle of interstate cummerce.

by **DomingoOrtiz** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:10 pm

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
Mosi {l Wrote}:speaking of the Feds, question for the lawyers and those who play them on TV

isn't transporting a minor across state lines for the purpose of buggering the minor a federal crime???

Ah, the principle of interstate cummerce.

So, how many posters are damned to Hell from this thread?

by **ryrob** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:13 pm

RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:
ryrob {l Wrote}:I have better things to do than "neg" your karma. Of course, in your world, no one else could possibly find you as stupid as I do. You're either 15, or you're 30 and you write like you're 15. Not sure which is worse.

If by "better things to do" you mean defending the indefensible, then have at it. You certainly changed your tune about the "hearsay" aspect of things when the GJ Testimony was printed and showed that Sandusky was anal raping and fellating young boys. You're either a member of NAMBLA, or you write like you want to be. Not sure which is worse.

Hey clown, work on reading comprehension. My point at the time was that details were murky concerning what JoePa did / didn't know at the time of the McQueary report. I said I wasn't going to jump to conclusions until testimony proved what he was told by the GA and also what the admins above him told him regarding the investigation. While it's becoming more apparent now that he fucked up and looks pretty complicit in the assault by not following up, the point was that he didn't see it happen himself and was in a justifiably bad spot considering his role as an employee hearing a SECONDHAND report from a fellow employee, not as a school administrator. Hence the "hearsay" comment that you feel necessary to harp upon because you have the analytical abilities of Coach Chimp.

by **Shredder** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:13 pm

Mosi {l Wrote}:speaking of the Feds, question for the lawyers and those who play them on TV

isn't transporting a minor across state lines for the purpose of buggering the minor a federal crime???

Yes. That's the Mann Act. It's most notably been used to prosecute polygamist leaders but it applies to all other sex crimes with minors.

by **DomingoOrtiz** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:20 pm

ryrob {l Wrote}:
RegalBCeagle {l Wrote}:
ryrob {l Wrote}:I have better things to do than "neg" your karma. Of course, in your world, no one else could possibly find you as stupid as I do. You're either 15, or you're 30 and you write like you're 15. Not sure which is worse.

If by "better things to do" you mean defending the indefensible, then have at it. You certainly changed your tune about the "hearsay" aspect of things when the GJ Testimony was printed and showed that Sandusky was anal raping and fellating young boys. You're either a member of NAMBLA, or you write like you want to be. Not sure which is worse.

Hey clown, work on reading comprehension. My point at the time was that details were murky concerning what JoePa did / didn't know at the time of the McQueary report. I said I wasn't going to jump to conclusions until testimony proved what he was told by the GA and also what the admins above him told him regarding the investigation. While it's becoming more apparent now that he fucked up and looks pretty complicit in the assault by not following up, the point was that he didn't see it happen himself and was in a justifiably bad spot considering his role as an employee hearing a SECONDHAND report from a fellow employee, not as a school administrator. Hence the "hearsay" comment that you feel necessary to harp upon because you have the analytical abilities of Coach Chimp.

Can the Mods please move this :slapfight

to its own thread!!!!

by **Onyx Blackman** on Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:37 pm

ryrob {l Wrote}: Hence the "hearsay" comment that you feel necessary to harp upon because you have the analytical abilities of Coach Chimp.

I'm on your side in this slapfight, Lover of Dog Rapists But Not Child Rapists, but you're wrong on this. Coach Chimp's analytical abilities are second to none.

Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Re: Penn State

Who is online