Page 1 of 2

OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:19 pm
by HJS

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:26 pm
by b0mberMan
campion {l Wrote}:Does anyone remember Anna Schleelein?


ugh

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:33 pm
by b0mberMan
campion {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
campion {l Wrote}:Does anyone remember Anna Schleelein?


ugh

Do tell, young fella...


I never did anything to end up in her columns. But she would hang around where I worked and seem like she was expecting to be noticed. My coworker ended up taking advantage of her low self-esteem and was written about not too fondly.

She wasn't that attractive and she always managed to put me in a bad mood after I interacted with her.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:39 pm
by branchinator
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
campion {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
campion {l Wrote}:Does anyone remember Anna Schleelein?


ugh

Do tell, young fella...


I never did anything to end up in her columns. But she would hang around where I worked and seem like she was expecting to be noticed. My coworker ended up taking advantage of her low self-esteem and was written about not too fondly.

She wasn't that attractive and she always managed to put me in a bad mood after I interacted with her.


I remember her. You must be a grad in the 2002-2004 range then.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:40 pm
by b0mberMan
branchinator {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
campion {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
campion {l Wrote}:Does anyone remember Anna Schleelein?


ugh

Do tell, young fella...


I never did anything to end up in her columns. But she would hang around where I worked and seem like she was expecting to be noticed. My coworker ended up taking advantage of her low self-esteem and was written about not too fondly.

She wasn't that attractive and she always managed to put me in a bad mood after I interacted with her.


I remember her. You must be a grad in the 2002-2004 range then.


I have always been quite vocal that the class of 04 rulz and moderators from class of 94 drulz.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:50 pm
by b0mberMan
I stand by my original statement

:elephant

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:51 pm
by angrychicken
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
branchinator {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
campion {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
campion {l Wrote}:Does anyone remember Anna Schleelein?


ugh

Do tell, young fella...


I never did anything to end up in her columns. But she would hang around where I worked and seem like she was expecting to be noticed. My coworker ended up taking advantage of her low self-esteem and was written about not too fondly.

She wasn't that attractive and she always managed to put me in a bad mood after I interacted with her.


I remember her. You must be a grad in the 2002-2004 range then.


I have always been quite vocal that the class of 04 rulz and moderators from class of 94 drulz.


i think you meant administrators from the class of 94. your oversight is forgiven

No. He CLEARLY said moderators.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:52 pm
by b0mberMan
angrychicken {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
branchinator {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
campion {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
campion {l Wrote}:Does anyone remember Anna Schleelein?


ugh

Do tell, young fella...


I never did anything to end up in her columns. But she would hang around where I worked and seem like she was expecting to be noticed. My coworker ended up taking advantage of her low self-esteem and was written about not too fondly.

She wasn't that attractive and she always managed to put me in a bad mood after I interacted with her.


I remember her. You must be a grad in the 2002-2004 range then.


I have always been quite vocal that the class of 04 rulz and moderators from class of 94 drulz.


i think you meant administrators from the class of 94. your oversight is forgiven

No. He CLEARLY said moderators.


I hate it when you two fight. You both drulz equally. How's that?

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:55 pm
by b0mberMan
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:hasn't it been scientifically proven that the y2k bug may not have caused problems with computers around the world, but is directly responsible for the nerdification of boston college.


I attended BC on a full scholarship for Awesomeness

:band

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:00 pm
by angrychicken
“As a Catholic university, we do not allow cohabitation in our residence halls,” Boston College spokesman Jack Dunn said.

Rumor has it that this rule was implemented to combat teh y2k.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:19 pm
by 49dueagle
Rules for dorm "relationships":

1)Only use her room
2)Do not practice in coed dorms.
3) If the roommate is upset, invite her to join.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:23 pm
by b0mberMan
campion {l Wrote}:She's still in the area, b0mber. And surprise, surprise, she's a lawyer. But not chasing many billable rabbits, apparently. Looks like she's having a "meet and greet" soon, too.
From the BU Law School website:

Shelter Legal Services
Law students will interview clients and manage civil legal cases, under the supervision of an attorney, at one of four weekly legal clinics. Clients need help on a variety of issues, including family law, housing, disability, unemployment and immigration. Students must attend training in Fall or Spring. Clinic times and locations: (1) Mondays at 5 pm: Rosie's Place, 889 Harrison Avenue, Roxbury; (2) Tuesdays at 8:30 am: Cambridge Multi-Service Center for the Homeless, 19 Brookline Street, Central Square; (3) Wednesdays at 10:00 am: Chelsea Soldiers' Home, Chelsea; (4) Wednesdays at 6:00 pm: New England Shelter for Homeless Veterans, 17 Court Street, Government Center. Contact the organization for the most up to date training session information.

Office locations: Boston College Law School, 885 Centre Street; Suffolk Law School, 120 Tremont Street

For more information contact:
Anna M. Schleelein (BU Law ’08)
Veterans Program Director
Shelter Legal Services
885 Centre Street
schleelein@shelterlegalservices.org
617-935-2989

Shelter Legal Services Volunteer Training - Saturday, October 3, 2009 from 10:00am - 12:30pm. Location: Room Barristers Hall at BU Law

Please check out our website at http://www.shelterlegalservices.org for more information about clinics and student volunteer opportunities. If you are interested in volunteering and would like to attend an upcoming training please RSVP to Anna Schleelein at schleelein@gmail.com. If you are a 3L or a military veteran please let her know in your RSVP.


She tightened your pants, didn't she, you frisky old man?

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:27 pm
by b0mberMan
campion {l Wrote}:Someone pointed her out to me at a football game once. As I recall she was short, brown hair, big boobs and a pooch belly, big arse-- right?


Yus. So she reminded you of HK? I thought maybe it was her writings that did it for you.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:33 pm
by hansen
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:hasn't it been scientifically proven that the y2k bug may not have caused problems with computers around the world, but is directly responsible for the nerdification of boston college.


so first the nerdification was around 96, now you are implying around 2000. what is it? this is important i need to know.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:35 pm
by WilpertsRevenge
i remember he although not proudly

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:36 pm
by hansen
here's her pic to anyone that cares...

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:37 pm
by hansen
hansen {l Wrote}:here's her pic to anyone that cares...


it's never a good sign when you can't take a good B/W photo. that doesn't say much for what you actually look like in person.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:39 pm
by WilpertsRevenge
campion {l Wrote}:
WilpertsRevenge {l Wrote}:i remember he although not proudly

This is what the MTBSC refers to as a "cocktease post".



Nope, not a good story in the least and i was drunk enough to make it one. She was more talk than anything else. Nice cans though.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:52 pm
by HustlinOwl

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:56 pm
by eagle9903



that made my brain hurt

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:20 pm
by DavidGordonsFoot
hansen {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:hasn't it been scientifically proven that the y2k bug may not have caused problems with computers around the world, but is directly responsible for the nerdification of boston college.


so first the nerdification was around 96, now you are implying around 2000. what is it? this is important i need to know.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
hansen {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:hasn't it been scientifically proven that the y2k bug may not have caused problems with computers around the world, but is directly responsible for the nerdification of boston college.


so first the nerdification was around 96, now you are implying around 2000. what is it? this is important i need to know.


full nerdification was the result of the y2k bug. nerdification was well underway, however, with the class of 2000. therefore, nerdification began in 1996 (with the start of the class of 2000 in september) and reached its peak in 2000 with the y2k bug... those spared prior to 12/31/1999 were thrown under the book mobile shortly thereafter


I hate you all.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:19 pm
by angrychicken
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:
hansen {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:hasn't it been scientifically proven that the y2k bug may not have caused problems with computers around the world, but is directly responsible for the nerdification of boston college.


so first the nerdification was around 96, now you are implying around 2000. what is it? this is important i need to know.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
hansen {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:hasn't it been scientifically proven that the y2k bug may not have caused problems with computers around the world, but is directly responsible for the nerdification of boston college.


so first the nerdification was around 96, now you are implying around 2000. what is it? this is important i need to know.


full nerdification was the result of the y2k bug. nerdification was well underway, however, with the class of 2000. therefore, nerdification began in 1996 (with the start of the class of 2000 in september) and reached its peak in 2000 with the y2k bug... those spared prior to 12/31/1999 were thrown under the book mobile shortly thereafter


I hate you all.

Not all people from this timeframe fall into this category. It's just that a greater number fall into it.

p.s. - TRE fellinto it back in our day

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:28 pm
by apbc12
I'm an '04 grad, and by the time I graduated I already thought the classes behind me were progressively nerdier. Maybe people get less nerdy during college, I don't know.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:35 pm
by hansen
apbc12 {l Wrote}:I'm an '04 grad, and by the time I graduated I already thought the classes behind me were progressively nerdier. Maybe people get less nerdy during college, I don't know.


no i noticed a HUGE difference from the time i entered in fall 96 and the time i left in spring 2000.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:51 pm
by b0mberMan
apbc12 {l Wrote}:I'm an '04 grad, and by the time I graduated I already thought the classes behind me were progressively nerdier. Maybe people get less nerdy during college, I don't know.


I think the class of 05 almost put Mary Ann's out of business because they stopped going so much on weekdays. True story. Or at least I heard some facsimile from Chris the doorman drunk downtown one night.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:05 pm
by DavidGordonsFoot
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
apbc12 {l Wrote}:I'm an '04 grad, and by the time I graduated I already thought the classes behind me were progressively nerdier. Maybe people get less nerdy during college, I don't know.


I think the class of 05 almost put Mary Ann's out of business because they stopped going so much on weekdays. True story. Or at least I heard some facsimile from Chris the doorman drunk downtown one night.


Was that the same year MA's got in trouble and could no longer accept out-of-state ID? The kids essentially boycotted after that because not all of their friends could get in.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:40 pm
by apbc12
All I know is, when I was in Boston sometime last year, I got together with several friends to take a trip to MA's at about 4 on a Friday afternoon, and there was one other person there. :lame Congrats new nerds, you ruined an institution.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:47 pm
by DavidGordonsFoot
apbc12 {l Wrote}:All I know is, when I was in Boston sometime last year, I got together with several friends to take a trip to MA's at about 4 on a Friday afternoon, and there was one other person there. :lame Congrats new nerds, you ruined an institution.


Had a similar experience when I finished my master's. It was 7:30 PM on a Wednesday night during Finals Week. People still drank during finals when I was at BC.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:48 pm
by shockdoct
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
apbc12 {l Wrote}:I'm an '04 grad, and by the time I graduated I already thought the classes behind me were progressively nerdier. Maybe people get less nerdy during college, I don't know.


I think the class of 05 almost put Mary Ann's out of business because they stopped going so much on weekdays. True story. Or at least I heard some facsimile from Chris the doorman drunk downtown one night.


Was that the same year MA's got in trouble and could no longer accept out-of-state ID? The kids essentially boycotted after that because not all of their friends could get in.


MAs priced themselves out of business. You're a dive, price your beer like one. They just started to live off their reputation while the other bars did midweek dollar drafts.

Re: OT: Tufts revisiting Bowers v. Hartwick

PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:20 pm
by AdamBC
shockdoct {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:
b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
apbc12 {l Wrote}:I'm an '04 grad, and by the time I graduated I already thought the classes behind me were progressively nerdier. Maybe people get less nerdy during college, I don't know.


I think the class of 05 almost put Mary Ann's out of business because they stopped going so much on weekdays. True story. Or at least I heard some facsimile from Chris the doorman drunk downtown one night.


Was that the same year MA's got in trouble and could no longer accept out-of-state ID? The kids essentially boycotted after that because not all of their friends could get in.


MAs priced themselves out of business. You're a dive, price your beer like one. They just started to live off their reputation while the other bars did midweek dollar drafts.


And their 'Passport Era' scared away many from future classes. They screwed themselves on prices and scaring away underage people who would otherwise go there when legal.