can we talk sox here for a second?

Home of Football Tailgating, Intramural Football and the occasional baseball game
Forum rules
"The opinions expressed on this board are property of the poster and do not reflect the opinion of EagleOutsider, Boston College or Boston College Athletics"

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby flyingelvii on Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:39 pm

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}::slapfight


Not really a good one though. Summary: I believe that bad managing and epic choking, rather than statistics, are to blame for epically bad managing and choking, so I must read O'Shaughnessy and call into EEI.

I know you are baiting here but...

You claim A-Gon underperformed when he hit .318 with a .977 Ops, 4 HR and 17 RBI in September. Projecting that out to 162 games, that's 25 HR and 106 RBI. In reality, he hit .338 with a .958 OPS, 27 HR and 117 RBI for the year. Please, please explain to me why that is well below his performance levels.

With regards to the clutch hits point, imperfect data and all, but he hit .337 with a .924 OPS, 4 HR and 83 RBI with RISP and .303 with an .861 OPS, 2 HR and 29 RBI in 66 AB with RSIP and 2-outs. He's also at his best when in a one-run game. Go figure. Trying to find inning-by-inning splits but, yeah, you're wrong.

And I've read that sentence about 10 times and I still have no idea what it means. You presented an argument based of feeling. I called it out based on what actually happened. You wrote an incoherent sentence about...something.

Edit: Hooray! Found more split numbers and they all confirm basically the same thing I was pointing out above. Sorry I couldn't watch every game. When that happens you have to rely on what you have on hand. What we have on hand is a bunch of info that says Adrian Gonzalez is a pretty consistent hitter in nearly every situation. In case you want to look, here ya go: http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?id=gonzaad01&year=&t=b#clutc


Jeez, elvii, I'm surprised you're able to keep up these stat projections between all the japanese zimas.

The radiation keeps me alert.
flyingelvii
Higgins Hall
 
Posts: 5871
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:28 pm
Karma: -50

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby twballgame9 on Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:57 pm

flyingelvii {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:As far as the IP goes, if a guy throws 35 pitches in one inning, and another throws 12 pitches over 2 innings, did the guy with 2 IP get more or less work?

No shit. We don't have those numbers to my knowledge. So I move to the next best thing. And theoretically, if a guy is taking 20 pitches to get out of an inning he's not going to be a 7th, 8th or 9th guy. Gotta make some assumptions when working with incomplete data here big guy.


I don't have incomplete data. I watched almost every game through July. Bard throws a ton of pitches in his innings, and he gets up almost every game.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34378
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby twballgame9 on Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:59 pm

flyingelvii {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}::slapfight


Not really a good one though. Summary: I believe that bad managing and epic choking, rather than statistics, are to blame for epically bad managing and choking, so I must read O'Shaughnessy and call into EEI.

I know you are baiting here but...

You claim A-Gon underperformed when he hit .318 with a .977 Ops, 4 HR and 17 RBI in September. Projecting that out to 162 games, that's 25 HR and 106 RBI. In reality, he hit .338 with a .958 OPS, 27 HR and 117 RBI for the year. Please, please explain to me why that is well below his performance levels.

With regards to the clutch hits point, imperfect data and all, but he hit .337 with a .924 OPS, 4 HR and 83 RBI with RISP and .303 with an .861 OPS, 2 HR and 29 RBI in 66 AB with RSIP and 2-outs. He's also at his best when in a one-run game. Go figure. Trying to find inning-by-inning splits but, yeah, you're wrong.

And I've read that sentence about 10 times and I still have no idea what it means. You presented an argument based of feeling. I called it out based on what actually happened. You wrote an incoherent sentence about...something.

Edit: Hooray! Found more split numbers and they all confirm basically the same thing I was pointing out above. Sorry I couldn't watch every game. When that happens you have to rely on what you have on hand. What we have on hand is a bunch of info that says Adrian Gonzalez is a pretty consistent hitter in nearly every situation. In case you want to look, here ya go: http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?id=gonzaad01&year=&t=b#clutc


I can't remember an important hit by Adrian Gonzalez in the past 2-3 months. And he got 5 of his 9 HRs in August and September in like 8 ABs. He was on fire for about 3 games there.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34378
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby EagleNYC on Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:00 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}::slapfight


Not really a good one though. Summary: I believe that bad managing and epic choking, rather than statistics, are to blame for epically bad managing and choking, so I must read O'Shaughnessy and call into EEI.

I know you are baiting here but...

You claim A-Gon underperformed when he hit .318 with a .977 Ops, 4 HR and 17 RBI in September. Projecting that out to 162 games, that's 25 HR and 106 RBI. In reality, he hit .338 with a .958 OPS, 27 HR and 117 RBI for the year. Please, please explain to me why that is well below his performance levels.

With regards to the clutch hits point, imperfect data and all, but he hit .337 with a .924 OPS, 4 HR and 83 RBI with RISP and .303 with an .861 OPS, 2 HR and 29 RBI in 66 AB with RSIP and 2-outs. He's also at his best when in a one-run game. Go figure. Trying to find inning-by-inning splits but, yeah, you're wrong.

And I've read that sentence about 10 times and I still have no idea what it means. You presented an argument based of feeling. I called it out based on what actually happened. You wrote an incoherent sentence about...something.

Edit: Hooray! Found more split numbers and they all confirm basically the same thing I was pointing out above. Sorry I couldn't watch every game. When that happens you have to rely on what you have on hand. What we have on hand is a bunch of info that says Adrian Gonzalez is a pretty consistent hitter in nearly every situation. In case you want to look, here ya go: http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?id=gonzaad01&year=&t=b#clutc


I can't remember an important hit by Adrian Gonzalez in the past 2-3 months. And he got 5 of his 9 HRs in August and September in like 8 ABs. He was on fire for about 3 games there.


:kudos Good memory. Check our from August 1 on, noting an explosion from 8/23 to 8/25, then 8/26 on.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.cgi?id=gonzaad01&t=b&year=
EagleNYC
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:11 am
Karma: 167

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby ryrob on Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:50 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}: so I must read O'Shaughnessy



I had to read it this morning. It was vintage Shaughnessy, like stepping back in time ten years. Midway through I was praying for a "Big Lug" reference just to wrap it all up, but he left us hanging.

Did you catch him in the booth with Heidi Watney during the rain delay? Talk about Beauty and the Beast...


No, but I heard that he said the TB game was ovah at 7-0. Pretty funny stuff. I pretty much watched the Braves game, because the Phillies were actually trying to win. 14th inning, and the starters were still in the game.


With AA and AAA players and Joe Blanton starting, but yes, still trying to win. It cannot be understated just how gutless the Braves are as well.
Image
User avatar
ryrob
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:43 pm
Karma: 406

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby ryrob on Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:51 pm

PhillyandBCEagles {l Wrote}:
I'm not a Sox-hater and actually root for them in the AL, but I have to say I'm looking forward to reading Tawmmy from Quincee's reaction on Kissing Suzy Kolber


Same. If you read the comments under the Tom Brady haircut article last night, there was some pretty solid hating going on.
Image
User avatar
ryrob
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:43 pm
Karma: 406

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby flyingelvii on Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:00 am

Looks like Teddy may get his wish. A bunch of reports hinting that Tito's leaving today, possibly to Chicago. Because anytime you can get rid of a two-time World Series manager, you just have to make the move.
flyingelvii
Higgins Hall
 
Posts: 5871
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:28 pm
Karma: -50

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby bignick33 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:05 am

flyingelvii {l Wrote}:Looks like Teddy may get his wish. A bunch of reports hinting that Tito's leaving today, possibly to Chicago. Because anytime you can get rid of a two-time World Series manager, you just have to make the move.


Replacement candidates?
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 909

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby pick6pedro on Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:49 am

bignick33 {l Wrote}:
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:Looks like Teddy may get his wish. A bunch of reports hinting that Tito's leaving today, possibly to Chicago. Because anytime you can get rid of a two-time World Series manager, you just have to make the move.


Replacement candidates?


Image
User avatar
pick6pedro
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 11582
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:25 pm
Location: A Chalupa Stand
Karma: 2633

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby claver2010 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:00 am

bignick33 {l Wrote}:
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:Looks like Teddy may get his wish. A bunch of reports hinting that Tito's leaving today, possibly to Chicago. Because anytime you can get rid of a two-time World Series manager, you just have to make the move.


Replacement candidates?


Moneyball

Image
Bush, George H W
Cosby, Bill
Disick, Scott
Flair, Ric
Griffin, Kathy
Khamenei, Ali
McCain, John
Pele
Soros, George
User avatar
claver2010
BC Guy
 
Posts: 20319
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 3381

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby Endless Mike on Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:10 am

Terry Francona must read these boards.
User avatar
Endless Mike
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 8489
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:02 pm
Karma: 1613

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby claver2010 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:22 am

Something I didn't realize until now, 2 out of 3 season ending blown saves for Papeldouche :kudos
Bush, George H W
Cosby, Bill
Disick, Scott
Flair, Ric
Griffin, Kathy
Khamenei, Ali
McCain, John
Pele
Soros, George
User avatar
claver2010
BC Guy
 
Posts: 20319
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 3381

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby eepstein0 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:31 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:As far as the IP goes, if a guy throws 35 pitches in one inning, and another throws 12 pitches over 2 innings, did the guy with 2 IP get more or less work?

No shit. We don't have those numbers to my knowledge. So I move to the next best thing. And theoretically, if a guy is taking 20 pitches to get out of an inning he's not going to be a 7th, 8th or 9th guy. Gotta make some assumptions when working with incomplete data here big guy.


I don't have incomplete data. I watched almost every game through July. Bard throws a ton of pitches in his innings, and he gets up almost every game.


You do realize the other options in the bullpen are Matt Albers, Franklin Moracles and a bunch of other shitty pitchers. Francona had absolutely no one else to turn to in that bullpen.
User avatar
eepstein0
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 17681
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:35 pm
Karma: -289

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby EagleNYC on Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:40 pm

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:As far as the IP goes, if a guy throws 35 pitches in one inning, and another throws 12 pitches over 2 innings, did the guy with 2 IP get more or less work?

No shit. We don't have those numbers to my knowledge. So I move to the next best thing. And theoretically, if a guy is taking 20 pitches to get out of an inning he's not going to be a 7th, 8th or 9th guy. Gotta make some assumptions when working with incomplete data here big guy.


I don't have incomplete data. I watched almost every game through July. Bard throws a ton of pitches in his innings, and he gets up almost every game.


You do realize the other options in the bullpen are Matt Albers, Franklin Moracles and a bunch of other shitty pitchers. Francona had absolutely no one else to turn to in that bullpen.


I think his point still stands. While it's true that the pen was flamable outside of Papelbon, Bard and Aceves, if you ride Bard all year he's more likely to flame out. Torre did this consistently with Proctor, Tanyan Sturtze and others, and it was short sighted. You end up trading possible wins in May-July for likely losses thereafter, including the post season.

*Edit: I still think they should keep Tito because I don't think there is someone better for this team next year. It appears this will not happen, however.
EagleNYC
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:11 am
Karma: 167

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:55 pm

flyingelvii {l Wrote}:Looks like Teddy may get his wish. A bunch of reports hinting that Tito's leaving today, possibly to Chicago. Because anytime you can get rid of a two-time World Series manager, you just have to make the move.


So you keep a manager because he won the world series in the past? Doesn't matter whether he is doing a good job? Or is your premise that winning the world series with the second highest payroll in baseball means that you are de facto a good manager?
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34378
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby bignick33 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:57 pm

T, what replacement candidates do you favor?
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 909

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby pick6pedro on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:01 pm

Whoever signed Renteria, Clement, Lackey, Drew, Lugo, Dice-K, Crawford, Gagne is definitely the guy who deserves to stay.
User avatar
pick6pedro
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 11582
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:25 pm
Location: A Chalupa Stand
Karma: 2633

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:12 pm

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:Whoever signed Renteria, Clement, Lackey, Drew, Lugo, Dice-K, Crawford, Gagne is definitely the guy who deserves to stay.


Very true. Overlooked in all of this is that Henry's cash covers up a ton of GM mistakes and the fact that despite unlimited resources, Theo can't assemble a mediocre bullpen.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34378
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby bignick33 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:15 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:Whoever signed Renteria, Clement, Lackey, Drew, Lugo, Dice-K, Crawford, Gagne is definitely the guy who deserves to stay.


Very true. Overlooked in all of this is that Henry's cash covers up a ton of GM mistakes and the fact that despite unlimited resources, Theo can't assemble a mediocre bullpen.


And, it's not even for lack of trying, which makes the weakness even more glaring.
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 909

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:20 pm

bignick33 {l Wrote}:T, what replacement candidates do you favor?


My number one of reasonable candidates would be Farrell, but I would be surprised if they call him. I'd also make a call to Tony Pena, if the Yankees will let him talk.

B-list guys include DeMarlo Hale, Pete Mackanin. And I am not adverse to the Schilling rumors.

My #1 guy from the pipedream list would be Gardenhire.

Not a huge fan of Valentine, and if they hire Torre, I am rooting for the Orioles.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34378
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:24 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}:T, what replacement candidates do you favor?


My number one of reasonable candidates would be Farrell, but I would be surprised if they call him. I'd also make a call to Tony Pena, if the Yankees will let him talk.

B-list guys include DeMarlo Hale, Pete Mackanin. And I am not adverse to the Schilling rumors.

My #1 guy from the pipedream list would be Gardenhire.

Not a huge fan of Valentine, and if they hire Torre, I am rooting for the Orioles.


Also like Dave Martinez of the names I have heard.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34378
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby bignick33 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:30 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:My number one of reasonable candidates would be Farrell, but I would be surprised if they call him. I'd also make a call to Tony Pena, if the Yankees will let him talk.


You nailed my top two hopefuls. I've always liked Pena.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:B-list guys include DeMarlo Hale, Pete Mackanin.


Both are impressive, but neither has extensive Big League managing experience (I'm not counting the < 1/2 season that Mackanin interim-managed in Cinci). Both have extensive minor-league coaching experience, but it's not the same. That being said, Hale should get an interview at the very least, because he has been an effective and loyal member of the organization for years.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:And I am not adverse to the Schilling rumors.


I am. He's sharp, but he's an egomanical prick. He's also a loud-mouth. Even though he fashions himself an old-school baseball guy, I have a hard time seeing him biting his tongue when it needs to be bit (something that Tito was exceptionally good during the Manny-era) both internally and externally.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:My #1 guy from the pipedream list would be Gardenhire.


Sign me up. Worth putting in a call to Gardy.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Not a huge fan of Valentine, and if they hire Torre, I am rooting for the Orioles.


Valentine is hilarious in the same way that a clown is hilarious. Torre obviously isn't as bad as you say he is, but I doubt he would ever come, so it's a moot point.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Also like Dave Martinez of the names I have heard.


I'm obviously familiar with him as a long-time player, but I know very little of him as a coach. I can't imagine he has much experience.
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 909

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby pick6pedro on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:36 pm

bignick33 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:Whoever signed Renteria, Clement, Lackey, Drew, Lugo, Dice-K, Crawford, Gagne is definitely the guy who deserves to stay.


Very true. Overlooked in all of this is that Henry's cash covers up a ton of GM mistakes and the fact that despite unlimited resources, Theo can't assemble a mediocre bullpen.


And, it's not even for lack of trying, which makes the weakness even more glaring.


He shoulda stuck with the Costanza move and stayed resigned.
User avatar
pick6pedro
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 11582
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:25 pm
Location: A Chalupa Stand
Karma: 2633

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby bignick33 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:39 pm

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:Whoever signed Renteria, Clement, Lackey, Drew, Lugo, Dice-K, Crawford, Gagne is definitely the guy who deserves to stay.


Very true. Overlooked in all of this is that Henry's cash covers up a ton of GM mistakes and the fact that despite unlimited resources, Theo can't assemble a mediocre bullpen.


And, it's not even for lack of trying, which makes the weakness even more glaring.


He shoulda stuck with the Costanza move and stayed resigned.


He won another World Series after the slapfight with Lucky.
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 909

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:46 pm

bignick33 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:My number one of reasonable candidates would be Farrell, but I would be surprised if they call him. I'd also make a call to Tony Pena, if the Yankees will let him talk.


You nailed my top two hopefuls. I've always liked Pena.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:B-list guys include DeMarlo Hale, Pete Mackanin.


Both are impressive, but neither has extensive Big League managing experience (I'm not counting the < 1/2 season that Mackanin interim-managed in Cinci). Both have extensive minor-league coaching experience, but it's not the same. That being said, Hale should get an interview at the very least, because he has been an effective and loyal member of the organization for years.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:And I am not adverse to the Schilling rumors.


I am. He's sharp, but he's an egomanical prick. He's also a loud-mouth. Even though he fashions himself an old-school baseball guy, I have a hard time seeing him biting his tongue when it needs to be bit (something that Tito was exceptionally good during the Manny-era) both internally and externally.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:My #1 guy from the pipedream list would be Gardenhire.


Sign me up. Worth putting in a call to Gardy.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Not a huge fan of Valentine, and if they hire Torre, I am rooting for the Orioles.


Valentine is hilarious in the same way that a clown is hilarious. Torre obviously isn't as bad as you say he is, but I doubt he would ever come, so it's a moot point.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Also like Dave Martinez of the names I have heard.


I'm obviously familiar with him as a long-time player, but I know very little of him as a coach. I can't imagine he has much experience.


I hear you on Schilling, but I think he would tone it down with the players. I don't think he is a candidate, but if he were named manager I would worry more about him being buddies with the guys he played with.

Martinez falls in the same category with Hale. He's been a bench coach in Tampa for a while now.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34378
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby bignick33 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:49 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
I hear you on Schilling, but I think he would tone it down with the players. I don't think he is a candidate, but if he were named manager I would worry more about him being buddies with the guys he played with.

Martinez falls in the same category with Hale. He's been a bench coach in Tampa for a while now.


Re Schilling, you couldn't possibly have Wakefield in mind, could you? That would be a disaster. Speaking of which, I wonder if him and/or Varitek will be back. I'll put it at 25% for Wake and 50% for the Cap'n.

The difference between Hale and Martinez is that I believe Hale had extensive minor league managing experience before he was hired as 3B coach with the Sox.
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 909

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:53 pm

bignick33 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
I hear you on Schilling, but I think he would tone it down with the players. I don't think he is a candidate, but if he were named manager I would worry more about him being buddies with the guys he played with.

Martinez falls in the same category with Hale. He's been a bench coach in Tampa for a while now.


Re Schilling, you couldn't possibly have Wakefield in mind, could you? That would be a disaster. Speaking of which, I wonder if him and/or Varitek will be back. I'll put it at 25% for Wake and 50% for the Cap'n.

The difference between Hale and Martinez is that I believe Hale had extensive minor league managing experience before he was hired as 3B coach with the Sox.


I wasn't considering Wake as a manager, and no, I was talking about Schilling's professed man love for "Petey" and "Josh" and "Youk" and "Papi".

I don't see Wake coming back. They shouldn't bring back Varitek, the giant fork in his back slows down his bat.

The other difference between Martinez and Hale is that there is no chance that they don't completely clean house.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34378
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby bignick33 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:56 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
I hear you on Schilling, but I think he would tone it down with the players. I don't think he is a candidate, but if he were named manager I would worry more about him being buddies with the guys he played with.

Martinez falls in the same category with Hale. He's been a bench coach in Tampa for a while now.


Re Schilling, you couldn't possibly have Wakefield in mind, could you? That would be a disaster. Speaking of which, I wonder if him and/or Varitek will be back. I'll put it at 25% for Wake and 50% for the Cap'n.

The difference between Hale and Martinez is that I believe Hale had extensive minor league managing experience before he was hired as 3B coach with the Sox.


I wasn't considering Wake as a manager, and no, I was talking about Schilling's professed man love for "Petey" and "Josh" and "Youk" and "Papi".

I don't see Wake coming back. They shouldn't bring back Varitek, the giant fork in his back slows down his bat.

The other difference between Martinez and Hale is that there is no chance that they don't completely clean house.


It's over for Wake, or at least it should be. The thing about Tek is that, while he is broken down physically, he is still not worse than your average MLB backup catcher. In fact, he's probably a bit better. Unless you project Lavarnaway as a Big League catching prospect, Tek probably should be back (particularly if you buy into the whole intangibles with the pitching staff and leadership stuff).
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 909

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:10 pm

Tek is an automatic out against anyone with a fastball over 88. He needs to start that slow ass swing before he gets to the batter's box.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34378
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: can we talk sox here for a second?

Postby bignick33 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:56 pm

Tito is officially out. What do you guys make of the fact that ownership (and not Theo) are the voice behind the dismissal? Sorry that this the mobile link.

http://mobile.boston.com/art/35/sports/ ... fficial_fr
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 909

PreviousNext

Return to Shea Field

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests

Untitled document