Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Home of Football Tailgating, Intramural Football and the occasional baseball game
Forum rules
"The opinions expressed on this board are property of the poster and do not reflect the opinion of EagleOutsider, Boston College or Boston College Athletics"

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby EagleDave on Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:59 am

b0mberMan wrote:I don't think this Brazil team was as strong as the media said they were. I think they get the ND/Yankee/Cowboys treatment because of their rep.


They weren't...and they badly missed Ronaldhino who was mysteriously left off the roster for "attitude" problems despite his general awesomeness in the midfield. But...Brazil is still Brazil and they were still one of the 4 best teams in this tournament. The catch of course is that the Dutch are also one of the 4 best, making this game a sneaky toss up.
Is this the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
EagleDave
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Karma: 282

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby b0mberMan on Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:01 pm

EagleDave wrote:
b0mberMan wrote:I don't think this Brazil team was as strong as the media said they were. I think they get the ND/Yankee/Cowboys treatment because of their rep.


They weren't...and they badly missed Ronaldhino who was mysteriously left off the roster for "attitude" problems despite his general awesomeness in the midfield. But...Brazil is still Brazil and they were still one of the 4 best teams in this tournament. The catch of course is that the Dutch are also one of the 4 best, making this game a sneaky toss up.


... which is, of course, being billed as an upset because as you say Brazil is Brazil.
NorthEndEagle wrote:That donkey had character issues.
b0mberMan
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 6834
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:43 pm
Location: Uranus
Karma: 1632

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Jul 02, 2010 2:05 pm

If the Netherlands wins the Cup, I am buying one of those sweet jerseys. Klaas-Jan Huntelaar or Giovanni Van Bronckhorst are my top choices.

Woo hoo! Holland!
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 15288
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 1070

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby BCdee on Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:17 pm

Sucks to be Ghana. Wow.
Image
User avatar
BCdee
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:07 am
Location: SC
Karma: 325

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby branchinator on Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:25 pm

BCdee wrote:Sucks to be Ghana. Wow.


Has to be one of the most heartbreaking losses in the history of sports. Cheap ass hand ball leads to penalty kick, which is blown, and then the team chokes in 2 more penalty kicks. Gyan is the new Scot Norwood. Also, that idiot from Ghana who missed the first penalty kick screwed his team. Didn't even take a running start.
branchinator
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:09 pm
Karma: 200

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby EagleDave on Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:27 pm

Without question the most unbelievable ending to a soccer game I've ever seen...missing a PK at the buzzer in extra time after a brilliant handball by Uruguay to at least give themselves a chance...and then missing THREE PK's in the shootout! Unbelievable...
Is this the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
EagleDave
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Karma: 282

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby apbc12 on Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:49 pm

Gyan's going to have a hard time sleeping for a while. He had the keeper crossed up. The only near-equivalent I could think of would be missing a free throw in a tie game with no time on the clock. Sucks to lose on a handball like that, but credit to the Uruguayan for keeping the ball out. It may have been blatantly illegal, but not exactly cheating, either. And it kept his team alive.

The first Ghanaian guy to miss the PK must have been stoned.
Image
User avatar
apbc12
Higgins Hall
 
Posts: 4538
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:31 pm
Karma: 1741

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby branchinator on Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:29 pm

apbc12 wrote:Gyan's going to have a hard time sleeping for a while. He had the keeper crossed up. The only near-equivalent I could think of would be missing a free throw in a tie game with no time on the clock. Sucks to lose on a handball like that, but credit to the Uruguayan for keeping the ball out. It may have been blatantly illegal, but not exactly cheating, either. And it kept his team alive.

The first Ghanaian guy to miss the PK must have been stoned.


I'd like to know what the conversion rate is on penalty kicks. Gyan is going to see that ball going high for the rest of his life. Of course, his retarded teammate, Mensah (perfect name), hit the most limp-dicked penalty kick I've ever seen.

Suarez from Uruguay made an incredible heads-up play to keep that ball out of the goal. If Uruguay goes on to win it all, it'll be remembered similarly to Maradona's play.
branchinator
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:09 pm
Karma: 200

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby twballgame9 on Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:36 am

ESPN said the conversion rate in the World Cup is like 68%, which is down from the World-wide rate of just under 80%, probably because of the quality of the keepers.

On another note, as previously discussed, I am watching my first game since the World Cup ended in the US Ghana game, and as expected, there is no D in A-R-G-E-N-T-I-N-A
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 15288
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 1070

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby branchinator on Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:08 pm

twballgame9 wrote:ESPN said the conversion rate in the World Cup is like 68%, which is down from the World-wide rate of just under 80%, probably because of the quality of the keepers.

On another note, as previously discussed, I am watching my first game since the World Cup ended in the US Ghana game, and as expected, there is no D in A-R-G-E-N-T-I-N-A


It was quite refreshing watching another highly-touted South American team become unraveled when playing a calm and collected European squad. Brazil and Argentina might have more talent than Holland and Germany but they were too combustible.
branchinator
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:09 pm
Karma: 200

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby EagleDave on Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:08 am

branchinator wrote:
twballgame9 wrote:ESPN said the conversion rate in the World Cup is like 68%, which is down from the World-wide rate of just under 80%, probably because of the quality of the keepers.

On another note, as previously discussed, I am watching my first game since the World Cup ended in the US Ghana game, and as expected, there is no D in A-R-G-E-N-T-I-N-A


It was quite refreshing watching another highly-touted South American team become unraveled when playing a calm and collected European squad. Brazil and Argentina might have more talent than Holland and Germany but they were too combustible.


Ironically, it was the Germans who were perceived as the team most likely to lose it's composure and leave chances for Argentina. They're the youngest team in the tournament by a mile. Man do they look impressive though. Spain is going to have its hands full Wednesday. I still think the Spaniards are the best team, but I wouldn't be stunned to see Germany take that one...

Uruguay has no shot against the Dutch though. Don't be fooled by the high level in the Uruguay/Ghana game...those were 2 mediocre teams. Holland is legit.
Is this the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
EagleDave
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Karma: 282

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby flyingelvii on Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:49 pm

Looks like we have a new goal of the tournament. Sweet sassy molassy Gio.
flyingelvii
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3692
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:28 pm
Karma: 305

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby EagleDave on Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:39 pm

Respek to Uruguay who battled, but the Dutch were the better team. On to the main event tomorrow. Germany or Spain...who ya got? :woot
Is this the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
EagleDave
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Karma: 282

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby Endless Mike on Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:04 pm

I'm surprised the Dutch can play so well while clomping around in those silly wooden shoes.
NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!
User avatar
Endless Mike
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 7192
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:02 pm
Karma: 1328

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby cvilleagle on Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:45 am

EagleDave wrote:Respek to Uruguay who battled, but the Dutch were the better team. On to the main event tomorrow. Germany or Spain...who ya got? :woot


I really like Spain today. I think Germany's been in great form but Spain's the better squad and should come up bigger in the huge games, like today.
Image
User avatar
cvilleagle
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 6542
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:14 pm
Karma: 1152

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby shockdoct on Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:06 pm

Endless Mike wrote:I'm surprised the Dutch can play so well while clomping around in those silly wooden shoes.


clomping or clogging?
User avatar
shockdoct
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2750
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:40 pm
Karma: 295

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby Endless Mike on Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:22 pm

shockdoct wrote:
Endless Mike wrote:I'm surprised the Dutch can play so well while clomping around in those silly wooden shoes.


clomping or clogging?


Clogs make clompy noises like big clownshoes.
NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!
User avatar
Endless Mike
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 7192
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:02 pm
Karma: 1328

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby EagleDave on Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:46 pm

Spain wins again as another team refuses to play offense. It's laughable. Where does this innate fear of the Spanish team come from that causes normally potent offensive teams to back into a shell and await the inevitable? At some point you just have to play your game and let the chips fall where they may. You stand a better chance against this juggernaut by at least making attempts to score goals. Hopefully the Dutch will be play looser on Sunday and take the game at the Spanish.

All told, it was another typical game for the Spanish. The other team tried to bore them into a mistake, they wouldn't bite, and won ugly. Good for them. The potential impending blowjobs though, require me to root for the Dutch Sunday just out of principle as a guy.
Is this the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
EagleDave
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Karma: 282

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby 0J1969 on Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:51 pm

Image
0J1969
n00b
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:28 pm
Karma: 77

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby cvilleagle on Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:57 pm

EagleDave wrote:Spain wins again as another team refuses to play offense. It's laughable. Where does this innate fear of the Spanish team come from that causes normally potent offensive teams to back into a shell and await the inevitable? At some point you just have to play your game and let the chips fall where they may. You stand a better chance against this juggernaut by at least making attempts to score goals. Hopefully the Dutch will be play looser on Sunday and take the game at the Spanish.

All told, it was another typical game for the Spanish. The other team tried to bore them into a mistake, they wouldn't bite, and won ugly. Good for them. The potential impending blowjobs though, require me to root for the Dutch Sunday just out of principle as a guy.


Absolutely correct. Germany sat back, and sat back, and then got scored on. I can understand why a team like the U.S. refuses to play offense against Spain - our best bet is defend and counterattack. But at this level, you have to play some offense. No one wants games this important in PKs.
Image
User avatar
cvilleagle
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 6542
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:14 pm
Karma: 1152

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby twballgame9 on Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:05 pm

cvilleagle wrote:
EagleDave wrote:Spain wins again as another team refuses to play offense. It's laughable. Where does this innate fear of the Spanish team come from that causes normally potent offensive teams to back into a shell and await the inevitable? At some point you just have to play your game and let the chips fall where they may. You stand a better chance against this juggernaut by at least making attempts to score goals. Hopefully the Dutch will be play looser on Sunday and take the game at the Spanish.

All told, it was another typical game for the Spanish. The other team tried to bore them into a mistake, they wouldn't bite, and won ugly. Good for them. The potential impending blowjobs though, require me to root for the Dutch Sunday just out of principle as a guy.


Absolutely correct. Germany sat back, and sat back, and then got scored on. I can understand why a team like the U.S. refuses to play offense against Spain - our best bet is defend and counterattack. But at this level, you have to play some offense. No one wants games this important in PKs.


Germany's whole gameplan in this world cup was to sit back and then counter. It worked to perfection in their last two games. The England game in particular - 3 of their goals were the functional equivalent of cherry picking. The problem as I see it is that it is only an effective strategy if you get on the board first.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 15288
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 1070

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby flyingelvii on Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:30 pm

twballgame9 wrote:
cvilleagle wrote:
EagleDave wrote:Spain wins again as another team refuses to play offense. It's laughable. Where does this innate fear of the Spanish team come from that causes normally potent offensive teams to back into a shell and await the inevitable? At some point you just have to play your game and let the chips fall where they may. You stand a better chance against this juggernaut by at least making attempts to score goals. Hopefully the Dutch will be play looser on Sunday and take the game at the Spanish.

All told, it was another typical game for the Spanish. The other team tried to bore them into a mistake, they wouldn't bite, and won ugly. Good for them. The potential impending blowjobs though, require me to root for the Dutch Sunday just out of principle as a guy.


Absolutely correct. Germany sat back, and sat back, and then got scored on. I can understand why a team like the U.S. refuses to play offense against Spain - our best bet is defend and counterattack. But at this level, you have to play some offense. No one wants games this important in PKs.


Germany's whole gameplan in this world cup was to sit back and then counter. It worked to perfection in their last two games. The England game in particular - 3 of their goals were the functional equivalent of cherry picking. The problem as I see it is that it is only an effective strategy if you get on the board first.

And set pieces. Problem is that Barca's defenders are very good at defending them. The Dutch general play a pretty positive style but I could imagine them going into a shell somewhat so as not to give a ton of space to Xavi and Iniesta, who will kill you when you give them something.
flyingelvii
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3692
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:28 pm
Karma: 305

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby EagleDave on Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:26 pm

flyingelvii wrote:
twballgame9 wrote:
cvilleagle wrote:
EagleDave wrote:Spain wins again as another team refuses to play offense. It's laughable. Where does this innate fear of the Spanish team come from that causes normally potent offensive teams to back into a shell and await the inevitable? At some point you just have to play your game and let the chips fall where they may. You stand a better chance against this juggernaut by at least making attempts to score goals. Hopefully the Dutch will be play looser on Sunday and take the game at the Spanish.

All told, it was another typical game for the Spanish. The other team tried to bore them into a mistake, they wouldn't bite, and won ugly. Good for them. The potential impending blowjobs though, require me to root for the Dutch Sunday just out of principle as a guy.


Absolutely correct. Germany sat back, and sat back, and then got scored on. I can understand why a team like the U.S. refuses to play offense against Spain - our best bet is defend and counterattack. But at this level, you have to play some offense. No one wants games this important in PKs.


Germany's whole gameplan in this world cup was to sit back and then counter. It worked to perfection in their last two games. The England game in particular - 3 of their goals were the functional equivalent of cherry picking. The problem as I see it is that it is only an effective strategy if you get on the board first.

And set pieces. Problem is that Barca's defenders are very good at defending them. The Dutch general play a pretty positive style but I could imagine them going into a shell somewhat so as not to give a ton of space to Xavi and Iniesta, who will kill you when you give them something.


They're gonna get beat anyway if they come out in a shell. The difference is it will just be 1-0 again rather than 3-1 or 4-1. But again, your best bet is to get them into an up and down game and at least challenge them on the offensive end and take your chances. That defense has hardly had to do a thing besides sit back and enjoy the show the past 3 rounds. If you can get on the board against them first they'll have to chase the game a little bit and it would make it more interesting.

In conclusion...Dutch shell=1-0 Spain...Dutch attack=3-1 Spain but much more entertaining.
Is this the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
EagleDave
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Karma: 282

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby twballgame9 on Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:47 pm

Dutch win, 2-1
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 15288
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 1070

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby BC '00 on Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:01 am

campion wrote:I finally have something to root for in this foolish thing. Let us pray that Catholic Spain defeats the onetime Calvinist Netherlands and their culture of drugs and death. The Netherlands should belong to Spain anyway.


You don't believe in blow jobs?
Image
User avatar
BC '00
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Pikachu's Vagina
Karma: 192

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby twballgame9 on Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:29 pm

campion wrote: The Netherlands should belong to Spain anyway.


Yeah, how'd that work out the first time?
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 15288
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 1070

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby EagleDave on Thu Jul 08, 2010 5:57 pm

campion wrote:At the end of all of this isn't it really like if they held some sort of tournament that every school in the world competed in and after years of play and countless qualifiers and elimination matches you ended up with BC High and Walpole HS playing for all the marbles? Its too wierd that the two best soccer teams in the whole wide world are a couple hundred miles apart.


Considering that Asia and North America are pretty weak in soccer, it limits the actual distance that the 2 best teams could be from. So no, its not that weird. Without the benefit of the world rankings in front of me, if you scan the top 15 I think at least 9 of them would be European (Spain, Holland, Germany, Portugal, Italy, France, England, Greece, Serbia).
Is this the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
EagleDave
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Karma: 282

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby twballgame9 on Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:17 am

EagleDave wrote:
campion wrote:At the end of all of this isn't it really like if they held some sort of tournament that every school in the world competed in and after years of play and countless qualifiers and elimination matches you ended up with BC High and Walpole HS playing for all the marbles? Its too wierd that the two best soccer teams in the whole wide world are a couple hundred miles apart.


Considering that Asia and North America are pretty weak in soccer, it limits the actual distance that the 2 best teams could be from. So no, its not that weird. Without the benefit of the world rankings in front of me, if you scan the top 15 I think at least 9 of them would be European (Spain, Holland, Germany, Portugal, Italy, France, England, Greece, Serbia).


Croatia and Russia as well. Brazil, Argentina and US round out the top 15.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 15288
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 1070

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby twballgame9 on Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:06 pm

In a sport where sportsmanship takes a back seat to diving, fake injuries and weak ass delays, the concept of giving up possession to the other team as sportsmanship is retarded.

I was praying for that ball to go in. Screw the lame ass attempt at sportsmanship and screw this absolutely unwatchable Spanish style of play.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 15288
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 1070

Re: Official World Cup 2010 discussion thread

Postby RegalBCeagle on Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:47 pm

This WC Final blows to this point. Any time a player is touched the fucking pussy dives to the ground as if they've been shot in the leg. Spain especially. I hope those Euro-Pussies lose this match and then their bus gets apprehended and each and every one of them gets anally raped by angry locals.
User avatar
RegalBCeagle
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1820
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:55 pm
Karma: 109

PreviousNext

Return to Shea Field

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Untitled document