
Endless Mike wrote:BUMP
I knew I started a Red Sox Weirdos thread at some point.
Happy trails, Wakefield and Varitek. I'm relieved they finally stepped away.
pick6pedro wrote:Endless Mike wrote:BUMP
I knew I started a Red Sox Weirdos thread at some point.
Happy trails, Wakefield and Varitek. I'm relieved they finally stepped away.
More liked forced out. Only being offered minor league deals will make you step away right quick.
bignick33 wrote:This thread is way less weird than the bruins weirdo thread.
Endless Mike wrote:bignick33 wrote:This thread is way less weird than the bruins weirdo thread.
Give us a chance! I'll complain about spring training cuts soon enough.
bignick33 wrote:Endless Mike wrote:bignick33 wrote:This thread is way less weird than the bruins weirdo thread.
Give us a chance! I'll complain about spring training cuts soon enough.
No wonder he's so fat:
http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/sports/r ... a-20120323
DavidGordonsFoot wrote:bignick33 wrote:Endless Mike wrote:bignick33 wrote:This thread is way less weird than the bruins weirdo thread.
Give us a chance! I'll complain about spring training cuts soon enough.
No wonder he's so fat:
http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/sports/r ... a-20120323
I thought this was going to be about Joba Chamberlain's trampoline accident.
bignick33 wrote:Aceves named closer
bignick33 wrote:Aceves named closer
Endless Mike wrote:bignick33 wrote:Aceves named closer
I was surprised by that. I would have thought Melancon would get the call first since he closed last year. They still want to keep Bard in the rotation. I guess that means Vicente Padilla will fill Aceves' role from last year as the long reliever/emergency starter.
bignick33 wrote:Endless Mike wrote:bignick33 wrote:Aceves named closer
I was surprised by that. I would have thought Melancon would get the call first since he closed last year. They still want to keep Bard in the rotation. I guess that means Vicente Padilla will fill Aceves' role from last year as the long reliever/emergency starter.
Tony Mazz has been campaigning to try Padilla at closer, because it would keep everyone else's role the same. He must have been fucking with us.
Endless Mike wrote:Didn't Padilla briefly close for an NL team? I'm drawing a blank.
Endless Mike wrote:Endless Mike wrote:Didn't Padilla briefly close for an NL team? I'm drawing a blank.
Now I remember. He saved 3 games as part of the Dodgers' committee when Broxton lost the job.
bignick33 wrote:Endless Mike wrote:Endless Mike wrote:Didn't Padilla briefly close for an NL team? I'm drawing a blank.
Now I remember. He saved 3 games as part of the Dodgers' committee when Broxton lost the job.
Was this a self fag-tag?
Endless Mike wrote:Didn't Padilla briefly close for an NL team? I'm drawing a blank.
Endless Mike wrote:bignick33 wrote:Endless Mike wrote:Endless Mike wrote:Didn't Padilla briefly close for an NL team? I'm drawing a blank.
Now I remember. He saved 3 games as part of the Dodgers' committee when Broxton lost the job.
Was this a self fag-tag?
Not sure. I wanted to get the answer as soon as possible so if anyone else answered I could ask them to kindly check the timestamp.
DavidGordonsFoot wrote:Endless Mike wrote:Didn't Padilla briefly close for an NL team? I'm drawing a blank.
He saved 3 games as part of the Dodgers' committee when Broxton lost the job.
Endless Mike wrote:DavidGordonsFoot wrote:Endless Mike wrote:Didn't Padilla briefly close for an NL team? I'm drawing a blank.
He saved 3 games as part of the Dodgers' committee when Broxton lost the job.
CHECK THE TIMESTAMP!!
DavidGordonsFoot wrote:Endless Mike wrote:DavidGordonsFoot wrote:Endless Mike wrote:Didn't Padilla briefly close for an NL team? I'm drawing a blank.
He saved 3 games as part of the Dodgers' committee when Broxton lost the job.
CHECK THE TIMESTAMP!!
that wasn't so kind...
flyingelvii wrote:I'm sorry but in no universe is Andrew Bailey, or any reliever for that matter, worth 5-11 wins. Hell, there aren't even a ton of players who have that value.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest