NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!























Endless Mike wrote:The Marlins just unveiled their new logo and uniforms. They look hideous. Even the name sounds a lot more awkward than Florida Marlins. I thought the teal and black with pinstripes really worked for them.
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111111&content_id=25960478&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb














cvilleagle wrote:Update - I'm sure there are others out there, but here's a picture from the new stadium.











cvilleagle wrote:Update - I'm sure there are others out there, but here's a picture from the new stadium.

NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!














cvilleagle wrote:This franchise is going to set world records for ugliness. Something like this is going to be in their outfield, apparently:










MilitantEagle wrote:Endless Mike wrote:The Marlins just unveiled their new logo and uniforms. They look hideous. Even the name sounds a lot more awkward than Florida Marlins. I thought the teal and black with pinstripes really worked for them.
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111111&content_id=25960478&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb
Those are bad. In terms of new franchises in the four major sports (last 20 years or so), I thought the Marlins were one of the few that actually designed a decent logo. I think the Houston Texans did the best job. There is a long list of relatively new franchises with horrible logos/uniforms:
Carolina Panthers
Jacksonville Jaguars
Baltimore Ravens
Tennessee Titans
Toronto Raptors
Phoenix Coyotes
Atlanta Thrashers
Arizona Diamondbacks
Tampa Bay Rays
Charlotte Bobcats
Charlotte/New Orleans Hornets
Vancouver/Memphis Grizzlies
Crap all over the place. And you can the add the rebranding of the Patriots and Broncos to that list. Other franchises like the Pistons and 76ers were smart to return to their roots.











claver2010 wrote:So about those Marlins huh?8-13, a couple of innings away from dropping their 8th of 9










DavidGordonsFoot wrote:claver2010 wrote:So about those Marlins huh?8-13, a couple of innings away from dropping their 8th of 9
Another team that can't hit. The rotation has held up their end of the bargain.
And this can't make their executives feel good - the ballpark is just a month old and they're averaging 77% capacity. Say what you will about Met fans this year, but at least Citi was a tough ticket when it opened.





























claver2010 wrote:No one saw this coming











vegasEagle wrote:The Marlins will have $20 million on their payroll for next year after this trade goes through. What a joke.










pick6pedro wrote:vegasEagle wrote:The Marlins will have $20 million on their payroll for next year after this trade goes through. What a joke.
At what point does MLB institute a salary min? Or does agreement to that open the door too much for a cap?

pick6pedro wrote:vegasEagle wrote:The Marlins will have $20 million on their payroll for next year after this trade goes through. What a joke.
At what point does MLB institute a salary min? Or does agreement to that open the door too much for a cap?










DavidGordonsFoot wrote:pick6pedro wrote:vegasEagle wrote:The Marlins will have $20 million on their payroll for next year after this trade goes through. What a joke.
At what point does MLB institute a salary min? Or does agreement to that open the door too much for a cap?
The owners wouldn't sign off on changing the CBA without getting something in return. The MLBPA wouldn't agree to a cap, but maybe they'd agree to a structured bonus schedule for draft picks like the NFLPA did last year. When teams are drafting on signability instead of need, the system is broken. A bonus schedule would help foster competitive balance and put more money in the pockets of veterans.










DavidGordonsFoot wrote:pick6pedro wrote:vegasEagle wrote:The Marlins will have $20 million on their payroll for next year after this trade goes through. What a joke.
At what point does MLB institute a salary min? Or does agreement to that open the door too much for a cap?
The owners wouldn't sign off on changing the CBA without getting something in return. The MLBPA wouldn't agree to a cap, but maybe they'd agree to a structured bonus schedule for draft picks like the NFLPA did last year. When teams are drafting on signability instead of need, the system is broken. A bonus schedule would help foster competitive balance and put more money in the pockets of veterans.















Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest